The headline barely begins (it doesn't do it justice) to reflect the truly stunning content of this breaking story, as you'll realize once you read it, in its entirety.
Essentially, this is "the real National Security Agency story," IMHO--four month's late, but better late than never. The government really does "collect it all," on virtually all of its citizens. (Please read the entire article, since some of the most salient facts are buried deep within it. As Marcy Wheeler points out, in the update, below: This is about much more than "social networks." It's about the government maintaining virtual dossiers on most of its citizens.)
N.S.A. Examines Social Networks of U.S. Citizens
By JAMES RISEN and LAURA POITRAS
New York Times
September 28, 2013 12:10PM (EDT)
WASHINGTON — Since 2010, the National Security Agency has been exploiting its huge collections of data to create sophisticated graphs of some Americans’ social connections that can identify their associates, their locations at certain times, their traveling companions and other personal information, according to newly disclosed documents and interviews with officials.
This slide from an N.S.A. PowerPoint presentation shows one of the ways the agency uses e-mail and phone data to analyze the relationships of foreign intelligence targets.
The spy agency began allowing the analysis of phone call and e-mail logs in November 2010 to examine Americans’ networks of associations for foreign intelligence purposes after N.S.A. officials lifted restrictions on the practice, according to documents provided by Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor.
The policy shift was intended to help the agency “discover and track” connections between intelligence targets overseas and people in the United States, according to an N.S.A. memorandum from January 2011. The agency was authorized to conduct “large-scale graph analysis on very large sets of communications metadata without having to check foreignness” of every e-mail address, phone number or other identifier, the document said. Because of concerns about infringing on the privacy of American citizens, the computer analysis of such data had previously been permitted only for foreigners.
The agency can augment the communications data with material from public, commercial and other sources, including bank codes, insurance information, Facebook profiles, passenger manifests, voter registration rolls and GPS location information, as well as property records and unspecified tax data, according to the documents. They do not indicate any restrictions on the use of such “enrichment” data, and several former senior Obama administration officials said the agency drew on it for both Americans and foreigners.
N.S.A. officials declined to say how many Americans have been caught up in the effort, including people involved in no wrongdoing….
# # #
NOTE: Kossack Horace Boothroyd III published a post on this breaking NYT article (SEE HERE: "All your meta data belongs to the NSA") about six minutes prior to yours truly.
NY Times Caption: "This slide from an N.S.A. PowerPoint presentation shows one of the ways the agency uses e-mail and phone data to analyze the relationships of foreign intelligence targets."
(Meanwhile, the article tells us this information is available to--and sometimes accessed by--the NSA on all US citizens.)
# # #
Bill Binney Told You SoAfter quoting from Wired Magazine, Marcy refers to today's NY Times article, and the portion I excerpted, farther up, above.
By: emptywheel Saturday September 28, 2013 2:37 pm
Remember when Bill Binney said NSA was compiling dossiers of Americans, but Keith Alexander said that wasn’t true?A former NSA official has accused the NSA’s director of deception during a speech he gave at the DefCon hacker conference on Friday when he asserted that the agency does not collect files on Americans.
William Binney, a former technical director at the NSA, said during a panel discussion that NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander was playing a “word game” and that the NSA was indeed collecting e-mails, Twitter writings, internet searches and other data belonging to Americans and indexing it.
“Unfortunately, once the software takes in data, it will build profiles on everyone in that data,” he said. “You can simply call it up by the attributes of anyone you want and it’s in place for people to look at.”
Binney was contradicting statements made on Friday by Alexander, who told the crowd of hackers and security professionals that his agency “absolutely” does not maintain files on Americans.
“And anybody who would tell you that we’re keeping files or dossiers on the American people,” Alexander continued, “knows that’s not true.”
...It sure sounds like a dossier to me.
But then, the safe bet was always to assume Keith Alexander (and James Clapper, who also denied this) was lying.
# # #