Skip to main content

Banner from poster for Idle No More Global Day of Action on Oct 7
Idle No More - Global Day of Action, Oct 7, 2013  
Tomorrow, Oct. 7, the Idle No More movement—a broad coalition of indigenous First Nations people, Métis and Inuit, their allies in Canada, the United States, and around the world—has called for a day of action.  

This movement embodies a vision for indigenous people's rights and the environment: "Idle No More calls on all people to join in a peaceful revolution, to honour Indigenous sovereignty, and to protect the land and water."

Events are being held in Canada, the U.S., and around the world tomorrow, and will be ongoing.

“Our people and our mother earth can no longer afford to be economic hostages in the race to industrialize our homelands. It’s time for our people to rise up and take back our role as caretakers and stewards of the land.” This is a quote from the communication coordinator for the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Eriel Deranger, noted warrior in the tar sands battle.

Arm in arm with Defenders of the Land, a network of indigenous communities and activists in land struggle across Canada, environmentalists and climate-change activists like Bill McKibben and other supporters are on board. There are many ways you can get involved.

Follow me below the Daily Kos border for more.

Founders of Idle No More, Nina Wilson, Sylvia McAdam, Jessica Gordon & Sheelah McLean
Founders of Idle No More, Nina Wilson, Sylvia McAdam, Jessica Gordon and Sheelah McLean
The Idle No More movement was founded by four women (indigenous and non-indigenous) from Saskatchewan in 2012—Nina Wilson, Sylvia McAdam, Jessica Gordon and Sheelah McLean.

The background:

After the May 2, 2011 Canadian Federal election, the federal government led by Stephen Harper proposed a number of omnibus bills introducing numerous legislative changes. While omnibus bills had been presented to parliament by previous governments, the perceived ideological nature of the changes proposed in Bill C-45 played to fears of a right-wing agenda held by the Conservatives, particularly concerning the removal of the term "absolute surrender" in Section 208, among others.

A number of these measures drew fire from environmental and First Nations groups. In particular, Bill C-45 overhauled the Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) of 1882, renaming it the Navigation Protection Act (NPA). The NWPA had mandated an extensive approval and consultation process before construction of any kind could take place in or around any water which could in principle be navigated by any kind of floating craft. Under the new NPA, the approval process would only be required for development around one of a vastly circumscribed list of waterways set by the Minister of Transportation. Many of the newly deregulated waterways passed through traditional First Nations land.

While the NWPA had originally been intended to facilitate actual navigation, the ubiquity of waterways in the Canadian wilderness has given it the effect of strong environmental legislation by presenting a significant barrier to industrial development, especially to projects such as pipelines which crossed many rivers. The government had by this time been engaged for some years in a campaign for approval of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines Project, a proposal to build a pipeline for bitumen condensate connecting the Athabasca tar sands with the Pacific Ocean, facilitating unprocessed bitumen exports to China. Many bills affecting First Nations people have failed to be passed. Numerous attempts to introduce bills have failed due to their low priority for past federal governments, eventually dying on the order paper without being debated or passed...Further background to this is the feeling that the federal government has repeatedly acted in bad faith with Aboriginal people's interests, and have violated treaties when it suited them. The feeling that the traditional tactics of negotiating with the federal government have become meaningless has caused support for new tactics.

The movement achieved greater visibility when it was fueled by a 44-day liquid diet hunger strike, undertaken by Chief of the Attawapiskat First Nation in Canada Theresa Spence, which ended on Jan. 24, 2013.

When we approach or highlight issues being raised and confronted by native peoples, too often we see things in terms of "borders" like those between Canada and the U.S. or the U.S. and Mexico. The use of the term "American Indians" in the U.S. tends to obfuscate the relationships that pre-date the drawing of national lines, and often has dire consequences for those peoples divided by these boundaries.

Book cover, Native Nations and U.S. Borders:  Challenges to Indigenous Culture, Citizenship, and Security   authors: Rachel Rose Starks, Jen McCormack, and Stephen Cornell  
Native Nations and U.S. Borders: Challenges to Indigenous Culture, Citizenship, and Security.  
Rachel Rose Starks, Jen McCormack, and Stephen Cornell
We cannot ignore how differing national government policies affect the daily lives and futures of indigenous peoples.

These issues are explored in a book from The University of Arizona's Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management and Policy: Native Nations and U.S. Borders: Challenges to Indigenous Culture, Citizenship, and Security

While they mark separations (political, cultural, and economic) they also are sites of convergence, places where nations, peoples, and environments meet and connect. Along borders are continuities as well: ecosystems, relationships, and human communities. What borders often fail to be, ironically, is definitive.

For Indigenous peoples living near international borders that separate the United States from Canada, Mexico, and Russia, the two sides of the boundary may compose a single contiguous space: a homeland, or a network of relationships reaching far back to a distant past. In these regions, Indigenous ideas and practices -- many of them multiple centuries old -- meet U.S. border policies head-on, raising challenges both for the governments of the countries involved and for Native nations themselves.

But policy discussions about U.S. borders seldom include Native voices and seldom take Native views into account. And they rarely address how policies designed to protect international borders drastically affect Native nations that live near those borders or are divided by them.  

While many progressives and activists in the United States are focused on the impact of the shutdown of the government by Republicans, and news stories focus on federal workers, overlooked are the dire consequences for Native Americans on this side of the Canadian-U.S. border, where Indian county is hard hit, and "federal funding has been cut off for crucial services including foster care payments, nutrition programs and financial assistance for the needy."

Indigenous peoples need your support as allies. More importantly, the world they are seeking to preserve and sustain is one in which we all live—our water, land, air and natural resources see no skin color or ethnicity.  

Take a stand, join hands and raise your voices for all of us and for future generations. You can join Native American Netroots right here at Daily Kos.  

Tomorrow you can become a part of living history, and proclaim that you will be Idle No More.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Sun Oct 06, 2013 at 06:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Barriers and Bridges, Climate Change SOS, Canadian Kossacks, Gulf Watchers Group, White Privilege Working Group, Native American Netroots, and Hellraisers Journal.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site