Skip to main content

By Jeff Madrick, originally published on Next New Deal

President Obama can't negotiate with Republicans if they won't drop their threats against the government and the economy.

It’s very important that President Obama and his aides make clear to the American public that the Republican Party’s right wing, supported by moderates, offered no serious deal to him by proposing a postponement of their threat to let the U.S. default. They pointed a gun at his head and then said they may not pull the trigger for another six weeks. That is still extortion of the worst kind. Obama is simply saying, “Put the gun down and I will negotiate.”   

I notice a bias in the media. For example, The Wall Street Journal’s front page today said point blank that Obama turned down the Republicans’ offer to negotiate without mentioning that they did not withdraw their threat to do this all over again, which is the obstacle in the first place.

Meanwhile, I was asked by Sky News yesterday why I am only picking on Republicans. I answered that any make-believe that there is even partial blame to go around is nonsense. Sky wasn’t taking sides so much as doing that “even-handed’ thing that mainstream media thinks passes for objectivity.    

The public can be easily seduced by the Republicans’ non-offer, so Obama constantly has to make clear they made no real offer.

The substance of all this is often lost, too. First of all, why is this small group of Republicans so profoundly disturbed by Obamacare? Here’s where a bit of history hurts. We remember that universal health care failed to get passed under FDR, who wanted such a system. It made perfectly good sense to him. The American Medical Association, the doctors’ organization, pushed hard against it, and the phrase “socialized medicine” in a time of rising anti-communism struck a chord among the people. FDR lost the battle.

We assume those same sentiments are still at work. Now, of course, big pharma and insurance companies are often the opposition to single-payer. And no doubt there is still a lot of nonsense about not letting Uncle Sam into our medical offices or creating requirements to buy insurance.

But in the case of Obamacare, we may be fooling ourselves. The source of opposition to it could be as simple as intense racial prejudice and anti-abortion attitudes. Obamacare would radically expand Medicaid, a service for the poor. In the South, that mostly means black people. And many southern governors, even though it would cost them almost nothing because the federal government would pick up 90 percent of the cost, are not implementing the plan.   

The Republicans also want a “conscience” clause to allow individual corporations to refuse abortion financing. The Washington Post reported that in a closed-door session, Paul Ryan said Republicans can’t accept an extension of the deadline because they need it as “leverage” for demanding the conscience clause. Undermining Obamacare is still high on the agenda.   

The Republican counter, of course, made it seem that Obamacare wasn’t their current concern anymore, and that a broad negotiation to reduce the deficit was now the issue. On this, Larry Summers has an important piece in the Financial Times today showing that the 10-year deficit is now a non-issue. More important, he is claiming the long-term deficit is also a non-issue. By his calculation, we only have to grow by 0.2 percent more a year to keep it manageable, even as Medicare and Medicaid costs rise rapidly.  

Coming from the man who seemed to support a budget deficit-cutting commission early in Obama’s term, when he should have known better, this seems to be a helpful shift back to reality.

Growth is what matters, to which the Republican respond that they want more government cuts. The Senate Democrats won’t agree to retain the sequester and thereby do a deal with the Senate Republicans, but Mitch McConnell boasts how much it has cut government spending. He left out the part about how it is seriously impeding America’s economic growth at the same time. 

Without the sequester, the U.S. would very likely be growing at a healthy pace now, reducing unemployment and probably the deficit compared to GDP as well.

It would be nice to get serious talk about the economy back on track. The media could help. Wishful thinking.

Jeff Madrick is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute and Director of the Bernard L. Schwartz Rediscovering Government Initiative.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I now truly believe the GOP wants to keep the (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    1BQ, Redfire

    government shut down and defaulted for as long as possible. They think they can ruin Obama's legacy and also inflict maximum pain on all the groups they hate: government workers, women, children, minorities and seniors. Pundits have been wrongly assuming they'd eventually cave under pressure from Wall Street, the Chamber and business lobbies but this current group is way more concerned with breaking Obama than with getting reelected next year. Unless a decent size group of "moderates" break away from leadership and the Tea Party, we are in for a rocky ride. I doubt that even throwing the Republicans something they say they want (short of repealing or defunding the ACA) would end it, the House GOP would simply move the goalposts again...

    Let's not let 2014 be anything like 2010. Republicans only win when we stay home!

    by Tim D M on Mon Oct 14, 2013 at 04:31:53 PM PDT

    •  I reluctantly agree with this. I'm starting to (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      believe that even their precious ideology is trumped by Obama Derangement Syndrome and their unrelenting need to deny the scary Black man in the White House any semblance of success.

      preborner: (n.) one who believes that the right to life begins at conception and ends at birth.

      by 1BQ on Mon Oct 14, 2013 at 05:03:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  They want to create a capital-D Depression... (0+ / 0-)

      ... they can hang on Obama, as a preemptive first strike in the 'We Elected One, That's Enough' campaign they will wage for the next 50 years.

      If you hang around Baggers for more than about 3 minutes, they turn the conversation to, 'we'll make sure another minority candidate never gets elected in our lifetimes.'

  •  Yes, the objection to ACA is about race, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    in their minds Obamacare takes money from hardworking Americans (read: White), and gives it to the lazy poor (read: Black) in the form of subsidies to buy insurance.  They had no such objections to Bush's drug insurance debacle, simply because of the difference in life expectancies between White and Black Americans.  

    190 milliseconds....

    by Kingsmeg on Mon Oct 14, 2013 at 04:59:33 PM PDT

  •  Sky News is Murdoch-affiliated so you can assume (0+ / 0-)

    ... a Faux Fascist Noise wingnut agenda.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site