Skip to main content

From Reuters:

Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson, two former editors of Rupert Murdoch's now defunct News of the World tabloid, were having an affair at the time their reporters are accused of hacking into phones, a court heard on Thursday.

Prosecutor Andrew Edis said the closeness of their relationship showed that both knew as much as each other how staff at the tabloid were operating. Both have denied conspiring to hack into phones or making illegal payments to public officials.

...

The relationship had been discovered after police found a word document containing a 2004 letter on a computer stored at Brooks's home.

"You are my best friend ... I tell you everything, I confide in you ... I love you, I care about you," the letter from Brooks to Coulson said, according to Edis who read it out to the jury of nine women and three men.

http://www.reuters.com/...

The hypocrisy of these two monster minions is appalling. Here they are alleged to be trolling illegally for others' infidelity, all the while engaging in it themselves. Coulson married Eloise Patrick in 2000, and has two children with her. Brooks was at the time married to Ross Kemp (2002 - 2009).

As BBC Home Affairs (no pun intended) Correspondent Dominic Casciani just tweeted (@BBCDomC) from the trial:

Tape near inaudible. Andy Coulson refers to newsworthiness of Home Secretary having a relationship with a married woman.
And another tweet from Brit during the trial today, implying similar double standards from Brooks:
Edis says story published on 15th - Blunketts Unknown Lover - the next day contacts with Brooks. On the Monday 16th Sun names the woman
This might be kind of funny if Brooks and Coulson hadn't likely ruined so many peoples' lives with their alleged snooping.

Update 1:

From the comments, Lib Dem FoP found this clarifying excerpt from the BBC:

Former News of the World editors Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson were having an affair for at least six years from the late 1990s, the phone-hacking trial has heard. Prosecutor Andrew Edis QC said he was disclosing the affair because it showed how much the pair trusted each other.

"What Mr Coulson knew, Mrs Brooks knew too. What Mrs Brooks knew, Mr Coulson knew too," he said. "That's the point." Mrs Brooks and Mr Coulson deny charges, including conspiracy to phone hack.

Jurors heard their affair, which began around 1998, was discovered by police through a letter saved on a computer belonging to Mrs Brooks. The letter was written by Mrs Brooks in February 2004, when Mr Coulson was trying to end the affair, Mr Edis said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...

Updated 2:

4:00pm ET - Brit's piece is now up on The Daily Beast:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/...

He is smart to keep the details 'alleged' in his reporting, because who knows, really - this could be a concocted or exaggerated story to somehow keep Rupert out of the mud.

Popcorn time, regardless.

Update 3:

From the comments, Brit has MORE!:

Apart from the staggering hypocrisy revealed by Brooks and Coulson exposing other people's affairs including senior ministers (note I don't say they exposed them by criminal means - unproven till the trial ends) there was another staggering bit of information buried in the opening.

The prosecution didn't need to refer to Glenn Mulcaire (the acknowledged hacking private investigtor) to prove Blunkett's voice mails were hacked.

All the voice mails from Blunkett about the affair were safely stored in the safe of NI's top flight lawyer - Tom Crone.

Gobsmacking

(my bold)

Update 4:

Still more from Brit in the comments:

I ought to add something now today's evidence has sunk in.

The really shocking stuff was about Milly Dowler, the way NOTW harassed and bullied the police, the way (according to the crown) Brooks harried the parents of Milly to give an exclusive interview, offering rewards, all the time senior editors were instructing Mulcaire to hack her phone, and sending out dozens of reporters on a wild goose chase because of a wrong number, and then withholding what they knew from the police so they could get a scoop.

So if Eric wants to update, please add this thought

Lest we forget. Today it was revealed at the Old Bailey that  Mulcaire's invoice to NOTW was marked "Milly Dowler Messages"

And it was paid in full.

-Brit

(my bold)

I suddenly feel less cuckoo for wondering if this Brooks-Coulson affair might be a bit of a diversion.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site