Skip to main content

Cross-posted at Attytood:

For the majority of us who care about stuff -- whether it's politics, or the direction of the country...or the media that write about those things -- there is nothing more frustrating than the lack of recourse for a legitimate grievance. In the political realm, there are elections -- yes, it's ridiculously hard to vote out incumbents, but there's always hope -- and we've also seen protest movements (the Tea Party on the right, Occupy Wall Street on the left) to fill some of the gaps.

But when the major mainstream media betrays the public trust, the options are more limited. Some news outlets have ombudsmen to represent the audience and some of them -- like The New York Times' Margaret Sullivan -- are very, very good at it. But what happens when a news outlet makes a major mistake, and refuses to respond responsibly? What recourse is left?

The recent bogus report -- not just a mistake, but an entirely bogus report -- by CBS' "60 Minutes" on the 2012 Benghazi attack is one of the more egregious cases of a major news outlet misleading the American people that I've seen in more than 30 years in journalism. The report by correspondent Lara Logan was based upon a supposed year-long investigation. Its centerpiece was a dramatic interview with a security contractor who it turns out was not even there -- a fact that the Washington Post and other outlets were able to confirm not in a year, but in a day or two. The result was a brief 90-second apology by Logan that a) sounded insincere, even smarmy, in my opinion, and b) didn't explain how such a shoddy piece ever made it onto national television.

I have the same questions that many others have asked. What was the reporting process that caused Logan and "60 Minutes" to believe the contractor Dylan Davies for a year, when his story was disproved, including by CBS' own journalists and FBI sources, almost immediately? How much was the judgment of "60 Minutes" blinded by the fact that its sister publishing company was publishing Davies' book? Did Logan's fiery belief that the U.S. needed to exact revenge for Benghazi cloud her own news judgment? (Because while I have no problem with journalists having a strong opinion -- you may have noticed this -- it is a problem when someone's views cause them to go to false or misleading places.)

CBS has shown in the past it knows how to do the right thing -- because it did exactly that in 2004, when it based  a report on then-President Bush's National Guard record upon phony memos. That time, the network allowed an extensive independent investigation and the responsible parties were fired or suffered career consequences. Nine years later, viewers should expect nothing less with this Benghazi hoax that's been perpetrated on the public. Instead, the network's dismissive and half-assed response has been an insult to all of us. So now what?

The "B"-word is not a word I would use lightly. I rarely get excited about boycotts because -- while I consider them a responsible, free-speech response to a significant wrong -- they are so often ineffective. In recent years, however, I've watched boycotts organized by liberal groups against clear hate speech by Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh to have surprising impact and staying power, and diminish the radio hosts' toxic effect on our political discourse. I know that "'60 Minutes" and especially CBS have a lot of accumulated good will, stemming back to Vietnam and Watergate, but those days were a long, long ago. In 2013, their bogus reporting has damaged the public debate on foreign policy, and their failure to investigate their mistakes is an intolerable breach of journalistic ethics.

I'm a journalist, not an activist, and I speak only for myself. I will not watch "60 Minutes," nor buy any product that advertises on the show, until a thorough independent investigation is launched. I may be alone on this (in which case it would be the most ineffective boycott in history!) but I hope that either a) others who are activists pick up the torch or b) CBS quickly reverses course, does the right thing and renders this all moot. There is one quality above all others that defines good journalism, and that is utter fearlessness when it comes to going after the truth.

What is CBS so afraid of?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

skybluewater, SME in Seattle, Mark Sumner, fly, paradox, Sylv, i dunno, RF, Chi, True North, Gooserock, NYmom, karlpk, Eman, LynChi, Troutfishing, Sandy on Signal, Richard Cranium, niemann, astro, Addison, workersuntie, Einsteinia, whenwego, ask, boadicea, roses, Alna Dem, aitchdee, kharma, tidalwave1, Farugia, pat bunny, Eyesbright, zerelda, Sembtex, Curt Matlock, tomjones, ScienceMom, vivadissent, Longwing, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, rapala, davidincleveland, sap, elkhunter, citizenx, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, where4art, blue jersey mom, RichterScale, Tunk, mightymouse, bently, xaxnar, Montco PA Dem, skywriter, tommymet, Themistoclea, profundo, cookseytalbott, dougymi, Lefty Coaster, blueoasis, aloevera, sceptical observer, bumbi, Dyana, thenekkidtruth, IL clb, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, suspiciousmind, kurt, lynneinfla, AllanTBG, OHdog, Polacolor, Cronesense, Haningchadus14, LiberalLady, gloriana, Trial Lawyer Richard, Matt Z, Dave in Northridge, Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle, dclawyer06, davehouck, Bridge Master, carpunder, skod, TomP, Empower Ink, MKinTN, mconvente, OleHippieChick, Youffraita, smrichmond, elwior, rssrai, hwmnbn, Jeff Y, glendaw271, petulans, Fiddlegirl, maggiejean, CanyonWren, Don Enrique, aunt blabby, kevinpdx, Shelley99, Tortmaster, LookingUp, collardgreens, Railfan, flitedocnm, NJpeach, gramofsam1, mookins, Things Come Undone, 2questions, pixxer, DiegoUK, nawlinscate, addisnana, Texnance, DrTerwilliker, ericlewis0, Loose Fur, stevenaxelrod, newusername, Joe Hills Ghost, Bluefin, Catherine R, lady blair, henrythefifth, lexalou, mikejay611, lupinella, jbigss, PorridgeGun, BarackStarObama, docterry, worldlotus, whoknu, old mark, waiting for lefty, Hayate Yagami, stlsophos, Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom, CharlesII, stills999, Horace Boothroyd III, stellaluna, reginahny, MartyM, lunachickie, flume, CalBearMom, Ray Pensador, nomandates, Late Again, CharlesInCharge, SixSixSix, HedwigKos, leeleedee, ORswede, solarbay, blue91, starduster, Rich452, Capt Crunch, joegoldstein

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site