Skip to main content

Originally posted at

If the business of America is business, which is better for America? A vibrant technology industry that is highly competitive in the global marketplace? Or a highly intrusive police state whose reach into our digital lives puts East Germany's Stasi to shame?

The question of privacy versus police state cost-benefit analysts occurred to me earlier this week when NPR aired a story about the National Security Agency's spying on Americans. "If cybersecurity is, in fact, a big threat, then our government should be doing everything in its power to make sure that [U.S. companies'] systems are as safe and secure as possible against all adversaries," ACLU technologist Christopher Soghoian told NPR.  Protecting American business is one of the NSA's self-stated core missions.

Instead, as Edward Snowden has revealed, the NSA is a threat to American businesses online. The agency's operatives don't view the security weaknesses of U.S. companies as problems to be fixed. To the contrary: NSA spooks see holes as opportunities to scoop up data. "When they learn about those vulnerabilities, they have to sit on them and exploit them rather than telling Microsoft or Google or Apple or Facebook," Soghoian said.

As a result, U.S. companies are more vulnerable to industrial espionage than their foreign competitors. Also, because the NSA makes copies of data and moves it through the Internet, it gives hackers more places to intercept and sneak into American corporate secrets.

"This bodes ill for the U.S. economy, as the rest of the world will turn its back on U.S. Internet companies," predicts Phil Zimmermann, creator of the encryption tool PGP (Pretty Good Privacy). "The NSA policies will cause enormous collateral damage to our economy."

Shut Down the NSA?

To someone like me, who is appalled that the U.S. government is listening to my phone calls and reading my emails for no other reason than the fact that they can, one solution keeps rising to the forefront: shut down the NSA. Of course, those are my politics. I don't trust government.

Most Americans agree with me. Cashiering the spooks of Fort Meade would appeal to many of the 74% of Americans who oppose NSA surveillance on them.

But then I began thinking about the vast scale of the post-9/11 police state. Tens of thousands of employees. Hundreds of thousands of private contractors. Many of them, like former CIA contractor Snowden, paid six-figure salaries. That huge data farm in Utah.

That's a lot of economic activity.

For the moment, let's set aside the moral and political ramifications of law-breaking citizens (the NSA's charter prohibits both intentional and accidental data collection in the United States) who spy on law-abiding citizens.

As a simple matter of short-term cost-benefit analysis, what's better for the American economy: privacy or police state?

The Price of NSA Spying

Companies and individuals value their privacy. Which is why, given a choice between trusting their data to American tech outfits like Google and competitors in, say, Europe, a lot of customers are taking their business elsewhere.

Sure, security might be compromised at European Internet corporations. France, Germany and other Europowers have their own NSA-like signals intelligence services. But there's no Edouard Snowden for France. People know the U.S. is completely infested by the NSA (and as we learned recently, the CIA). U.S. companies have lost billions of dollars in contracts and merger opportunities since Edward Snowden revealed the incomprehensibly comprehensive nature of the NSA's interception and storage of digital communications and, more damningly, the willingness of firms like AT&T, Verizon and Apple to cooperate with these illegal violations of privacy (and, in AT&T's case, to sell out their customers' data for cash).

Not that U.S. companies that try to protect their customers are allowed to do so. The USA-Patriot Act specifically prohibits recipients of NSA surveillance demands from disclosing them publicly. The owner of one business shut down his company rather than turn over his encryption keys to the federal government; he is still being pursued and harassed as retribution for his defiance.

The word is out: your data isn't safe in the United States.

The NSA leak stories have been hitting U.S. companies in their balance sheets.

"Cisco Systems warned that its revenues could fall by as much as 10% because of the level of uncertainty or concerns engendered by NSA operations. Cisco saw its new orders fall by 12% in the developing world, 25% in Brazil and 30% in Russia. This is in contrast to the 8% growth Cisco saw in the previous quarter," Republican Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner wrote in The Guardian. He quotes analysis by the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation that says the U.S. cloud computing industry stands to lose between $22 and $35 billion over the next three years.

Forrester Research says ITIF's "estimate is too low" and "could be as high as $180 billion or a 25% hit to overall IT service provider revenues in that same timeframe."

Wall Street is so concerned about the NSA and CIA as an albatross on the American tech sector's future earnings that institutional investors are pressuring companies like AT&T and Verizon to stop cooperating with the feds. IBM blames its 22% drop in business in China on concerns about NSA spying. (Considering China's sophisticated cyberhacking operations, the irony is thick — but there's a big difference between suspecting you're being spied upon and knowing it.)

The European Union is considering building its own no-Google/no-Apple/no-Verizon cloud to keep the NSA at bay.

There's no way to know for sure whether these fears will be realized. Google claims its bottom line has been unaffected. Some technorati say U.S. dominance of the cloud, coupled with the awkwardness of encryption protocols, will make it impractical for other countries to build a non-U.S. alternacloud. They'll know the cloud is compromised but they'll use it anyway.

Security analyst Richard Stiennon goes so far as to predict a virtuous cycle that would help the U.S.: as more companies will invest in encryption to stymie the NSA, the NSA will invest more to break it. Private industry and the NSA will hire more people. Go, economy, go!

But let's assume the worst-case scenario — Forrester's $180 billion downturn in revenue during the next three years. Would that loss be so disastrous that it would be worth shutting down the NSA?

The Profits of NSA Spying

As in the former Soviet Union, a vast array of government agencies spy on citizens in the United States. In addition to the FBI, CIA and NSA, there's Homeland Security and the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency). Each of the four branches of the U.S. military has its intelligence unit. There are at least 16 federal intelligence agencies in the U.S., including obscure organizations like the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which makes maps. The warm-and-fuzzy State Department has its innocuous-sounding Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Major police departments like the NYPD have their own intelligence gathering operations.

However, the NSA alone would be the target of our theoretical shutdown. Were President Obama to announce tomorrow that the NSA were going away, the CEOs of American tech firms could call their overseas counterparts and say: "Let's do business! The evildoers are gone!"

$60 billion a year, back in America where they belong.

So let's try to get a handle on how much economic activity the NSA generates.

Recently leaked documents show that the agency receives $1 billion a year off the books, as part of Congress' secret "black budget."

Steve Aftergood, director of the government secrecy program at the Federation of American Scientists guesstimates to CNN that the NSA's share of the annual intelligence budget runs about $10 billion a year. Total, then, let's say $11 billion. Reliable leaks split the difference: $10.5 billion.

The NSA directly employs between 35,000 and 55,000 employees. But that's only a start.

In his book The Shadow Factory, James Bamford says the NSA outsources a lot of spying to private contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton, where Snowden worked. "At the same time [then NSA director] Hayden was building his empire within Fort Meade, he was also creating a shadow NSA: of the $60 billion going to the intelligence community, most of it — about $42 billion, an enormous 70 percent — was going to outside contractors," writes Bamford.

OK, so make that total NSA budget $50.3 billion a year.

But that's not all.

"Of the 4.9 million people with clearance to access 'confidential and secret” government information, 1.1 million, or 21%, work for outside contractors, according to a report from [current NSA chief] Clapper's office," the Associated Press reported in January 2013. "Of the 1.4 million who have the higher 'top secret' access, 483,000, or 34%, work for contractors."

Snowden was one of 500,000 private contractors with access to the NSA's PRISM and other classified domestic surveillance databases.

Slicing the Data: Budgets vs. Employees            

Two back-of-the-envelope ways to compare the relative benefits of forms of economic activity are raw business — the total amount of money that goes into it — and total salaries.

The sum of the National Security Agency's native and outsourced/private contractor annual budget is, as we've seen, about $50 billion per annum. Since Forrester Research — the glummest prognosticator — worries that the U.S. tech sector will lose $60 billion over each of the next three years — the raw numbers are roughly a wash. At most, the U.S. economy would be up $10 billion annually by shutting the NSA — a drop in the bucket compared to, say, the three-quarters of a trillion bucks the United States spends on "defense"/war every year.

A more useful measure of economic activity is employment times average salary. Total salaries paid to actual individuals powers spending — and spending is what powers a consumer-based economy.  As I wrote in 2012: "General Motors, a company with $39 billion in equity value, directly employs 207,000 people, plus many more indirectly through its suppliers. Facebook has nearly twice the market capitalization ($67 billion) but employs a miserly 1,400 workers. On Wall Street, Facebook is worth more than GM. On Main Street, GM is worth 250 Facebooks."

So which affects more payroll: the post-9/11 security state, or a potential 25% loss of future revenues in the tech sector?

If you're wondering why the recovery doesn't seem too recovery-y, here's why: For a sector that represents the hopes and dreams of the postindustrial economy, America's technology industry doesn't employ that many people. According to TechAmerica Foundation, "the U.S. tech industry added 67,400 net jobs in 2012, for bringing the total number of tech workers to 5.95 million." This is a 1.1% increase. Average salary: $93,800.


Let's assume similar growth in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Subtract Forrester's 25% growth cut due to the NSA. That's about 210,000 fewer jobs over the next three years. Total lost salaries: roughly $10 billion.

Lay off those 500,000 Snowden-level NSA employees and contractors, lowballing their average salaries at $80,000 each, and you've got $40 billion in lost wages.

It's not even close. From an economic standpoint, the United States can't afford privacy.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Ah, but the money goes to the "Right" place... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PhilJD, happymisanthropy, poligirl, koNko

    You forget that all of those lovely little security contracts will be going to the good old traditional allies.  Big private contractors connected to politicians...

    Which will ensure they give nice big contributions and jobs to the politicians that voted for them...

    And private prisons need inmates, after all, so of course we need to find the criminals...

    Who of course will repay those that gave them the contracts to build those prisons...


    I don't blame Christians. I blame Stupid. Which sadly is a much more popular religion these days.

    by detroitmechworks on Mon Nov 25, 2013 at 08:23:06 AM PST

  •  Just want to get in a comment... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Don midwest, poligirl, koNko

    to push the inevitable onslaught from the "admirers" of Ted Rall and the NSA down a bit.

    Not all "admirers" are created equal.

    When you triangulate everything, you can't even roll downhill...

    by PhilJD on Mon Nov 25, 2013 at 08:25:53 AM PST

  •  Columbia Law Prof on Snowden & Privacy (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PhilJD, poligirl, whenwego, koNko, Jim P

    He is giving a series of talks that include the best discussion of privacy that I have heard.

    For example, the authors of the basis of our constitution, The Federalist Papers, were written by anonymous authors. They probably would have been prosecuted by the British for sedition.

    World wide privacy is in the balance with the spying.

    The title of his series is:

    Snowden and the Future

    He has given 3 of the talks and the fourth and final talk is on Dec 4.

    here is a link to the first three talks along with a video and pdf of the talks. They are great to listen to - excellent speaker.

    Some text from the first talk

    The power of that Roman Empire rested in its control of communications. The Mediterranean Sea, which was the transit hub of every western civilization, was their lake. And across their European empire, from Scotland to Syria, they pushed the roads—roads that fifteen centuries later were still primary arteries of European transportation. Down those roads which, as Gibbon says, rendered every corner of the Empire pervious to Roman power, the Emperor marched his armies. But up those roads he gathered his intelligence. Augustus invented the posts: first for signals intelligence, to move couriers and messages at the fastest possible speeds; and then for human intelligence. He created the post-chaises, so that, as Gibbon says, those who were present when dispatches were written could be questioned by the Emperor. Using that infrastructure for control of communications, with respect to everything that involved the administration of power, the Emperor of the Romans made himself the best informed human being in the history of the world.

    That power eradicated human freedom. "Remember," says Cicero to Marcellus in exile, "wherever you are, you are equally within of the power of conqueror."

    The empire of the United States, the global empire that followed from victory in the Second World War, also depended upon control of communications. Possibly the greatest military lesson of the Second World War was that he who has access to his adversaries' military communications prevails. At every level, from the tactical artillery duel to the greatest strategic naval confrontations in the Pacific, the new pace of warfare gave victory to the one who knew the other side's plans first.

  •  50,000 networks hacked by the NSA (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    poligirl, whenwego, koNko, Jim P, emal

    that's right boy scouts

    our national security structure is out there making sure that we are safe at night

    300,000 killed by guns since 9/11 in the USA

    30 killed by terrorists in the USA including 12 at TX military base

    need a reason to sacrifice our civil liberties to fight the terrorists menace!

    not only here at home, but around the world

    I did a google search this morning "NSA hacked 50,000 computers and got articles from the first page response from the following sources

    indiatimes  (guess also India)

    Shows that the MSM is not at the head of the pack on breaking stories these days. What do we care if NSA inserts malware into 50,000 networks in the world?
  •  Re (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    koNko, poligirl, stevemb
    Two back-of-the-envelope ways to compare the relative benefits of forms of economic activity are raw business — the total amount of money that goes into it — and total salaries.
    What matters is what it produces of value.

    The fact that the NSA dumps a lot of money into salaries isn't relevant. If they don't do anything of value to the average person, every one of those people should be fired.

    (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
    Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

    by Sparhawk on Mon Nov 25, 2013 at 09:43:21 AM PST

  •  Thanks for this round-up (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FG, poligirl

    I had previously quoted the ITIF and Forrester papers in several comments here on the subject and while I think, to some degree, IBM and Cisco are using the downturn in business with China as a convenient excuse to cover some emerging structural weaknesses in their core business as large cloud operations continue the trend to build their own (cheaper) servers and switches than buy the OEM systems, there should be no doubt the NSA debacle has seriously impacted the US IT sector and will continue to do so to some degree going forward.

    Most certainly the consensus amongst my colleagues and peers is could operations will become more national or regional (EU) and laws are likely to force some degree of data center localization.

    All that said, all the bad things the US Senate and Executive Branch accused Huawei of doing (but never proven) seem to have been projection of what the US government forced American OEMs to do in terms of backdoors, etc., so there should be no surprise if there is something of a backlash.

    I can state emphatically that cloud purveyors in the EU are doing some aggressive F.U.D. marketing against IBM et al these days. Ironic.

  •  The business of the US is finance (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    and they need a police state to keep the scams running.

    Obama: self-described Republican; backed up by right-wing policies

    by The Dead Man on Mon Nov 25, 2013 at 11:15:47 AM PST

  •  Ted's Math Is As Realistic As His Art (0+ / 0-)
    Lay off those 500,000 Snowden-level NSA employees and contractors, lowballing their average salaries at $80,000 each
    The janitors, cafeteria staffers, etc required to pad the figure to 500,000 are much closer to $8000 than $80,000.

    On the Internet, nobody knows if you're a dog... but everybody knows if you're a jackass.

    by stevemb on Tue Nov 26, 2013 at 09:47:36 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site