Skip to main content

Rep. Steve Stockman at the 2013 Liberty Political Action Conference (Gage Skidmore/cc)
Rep. Steve Stockman at the 2013 Liberty Political Action Conference
With the Texas filing deadline fast approaching, it looked like Republican Sen. John Cornyn would coast to re-election, escaping unscathed from tea party groups' drive to take out establishment-friendly incumbents.

Enter Rep. Steve Stockman. Seemingly out of thin air—and at the very last minute—Stockman filed to challenge Cornyn in the Republican primary instead of running for re-election.

While he's no Ted Cruz (who is?), Cornyn has committed no obvious apostasies like former Indiana Sen. Dick Lugar, famously turfed out in last year's primary by Richard Mourdock. Nor is he an aging pork barreler like Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran. So what's Stockman thinking? Well, he may have seen recent polls that showed Cornyn decidedly vulnerable to a primary challenge. But more importantly, Cornyn does look like a creature of the far-left... from where Stockman is standing.

Head below the fold as we take a detailed look at the positions Stockman has staked over the years and the remarkable rhetoric he's used to defend them.

Stockman was first elected to the House of Representatives when he defeated 42-year incumbent Democrat Jack Brooks in the GOP's 1994 wave. He only served two years (he was defeated by Democrat Nick Lampson in 1996), but that was enough time to make a name for himself.

In the spring of 1995, Stockman published an article accusing the Clinton Administration of having staged the raid on Waco as a way to justify an assault weapons ban. "Waco was supposed to be a way for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Clinton administration to prove the need for a ban on so-called assault weapons," he wrote, adding that for Congress to agree to pass a ban, "an incident had to be encouraged to happen."

Fast-forward to 2013: Within a few weeks of making it back to Congress after a 16-year hiatus, Stockman was once again blowing up over gun control. And while he didn't accuse President Obama of "premeditated murder" (as he had Janet Reno), he deemed Obama's proposals "unconstitutional and unconscionable," threatened to file articles of impeachment over them, and compared the President to Saddam Hussein.

Opposition to any form of gun control is central to Stockman's politics. Also within days of returning to Congress, he introduced the "Safe Schools Act," which would repeal federally-mandated "gun free zones" around schools.

And why stop at arming school officials? Stockman's 2014 re-election campaign is selling bumper stickers that read: "If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted."

As you'd expect from all this, Stockman is a firm member of the House Republicans' "ultra" caucus—those members who have been making life difficult for their chamber's leadership. He was one of 10 Republicans to not vote for John Boehner as Speaker (he voted "present") in January, and he was among those who had no qualms about Cruz's efforts to shut down the federal government in order to repeal Obamacare this fall. He even claimed that the 1995 shutdown had boosted (yes, boosted) the GOP—never mind that they lost seats (and the White House) the following year.

By contrast, Cornyn is the Senate minority whip—an obvious target for groups targeting the current GOP leadership—and his September vote against an early Cruz attempt to defund Obamacare  bill led the Senate Conservatives Fund to label him a "turncoat." (Oh, and Cruz had rather pointedly declined to endorse Cornyn.)

Cornyn did end up voting against the final shutdown-ending deal in October, however. He has been watching his right flank in recent years, eager to not leave obvious openings. So it's fitting that his vote against Cruz's pre-shutdown procedural maneuver is arguably his highest-profile split with Stockman this year: From the perspective of Cruz's allies, that vote was less about where Cornyn stands on any particular issue than about which side he's on—and how far he's willing to go to manifest it.

And there's no doubt that Stockman is happy to go very far.

In a letter he sent to his colleagues during his first term, Stockman didn't just compare homosexuality to bestiality—he lumped in premarital sex as well. He wrote: "[Our children] are taught that the problem with sex is not that it is wrong to engage in homosexual, bestial, underage, or premarital sex, but that it is wrong to do so without protection." The context of that letter was a bill he had introduced: the Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act. It called for an investigation into the studies Alfred Kinsey had conducted about human sexuality in the 1940s.

The Violence Against Women Act? "It’s called a women's act, but then they have men dressed up as women, they count that. Change-gender, or whatever. How is that—how is that a woman?" (Cornyn voted against the bill as well.)

Global warming? Stockman dismissed it as "the new fad."

Then again, it's not like Cornyn is worried about climate change. But can Cornyn claim to have gone all the way to Copenhagen during the 2009 global conference on global warming to take part in a counter-conference denouncing the scientific consensus on the issue? Nope, though Steve Stockman sure can. If you click on nothing else in this piece, click on this link to the New York Times article on that counter-conference. It features a picture of Stockman wearing a dramatic red mask over his eyes because "believing in global warming was like wearing a blindfold."

And he isn't content to support drilling for oil off the coast of California (which "liberal hatred of science and human progress" is preventing). He justified it by tweeting that: "The best thing about the Earth is if you poke holes in it oil and gas come out."

If you are waiting for an appointment in his office, the National Review reports that you can flip through a book called "Mixing Church and State God's Way." (Amazon's description: "A pastor... tells how we will lose everything if we do not stand up to the liberals and Muslims.")

Then, there's immigration. While Cornyn voted against the immigration reform bill that passed the Senate this summer, you may remember that one of the debate's flashpoint was his proposed amendment to significantly toughen border security as a condition for undocumented immigrants to apply for green cards. While Cornyn's amendment was labeled a "poison pill" because it would have led to an unraveling of the coalition that had put together the bill at hand, conservatives like Red State's Erick Erickson saw it very differently. That could hurt Cornyn in a Republican primary against an opponent who describes the Senate legislation as the "unconstitutional" "amnesty bill."

Stockman even warned that: “We’re going to have a Gang of Millions, because you can watch this bill as it progresses through the House committees that they will rise up against it and it will fail."

Recently, Stockman rushed to the defense of a University of Texas college group that had organized a campus-wide "game" it had called "Catch an Illegal Immigrant."

And then there are ethical questions surrounding Stockman: In late November, the Houston Chronicle published an expose into the 17 corporate identities Stockman has set up in four states and the British Virgin Islands—about which he has not filed federally required disclosures.

And just one week earlier, the Chronicle had reported that Stockman's campaign offices had to be shut down because "campaign staffers and volunteers had been both working and sleeping there, even though the commercial building was considered unsafe for human habitation" and was found to have 14 fire code violations!

That's not the kind of coverage you hope for in the weeks before you launch a statewide run. But it hasn't stopped Stockman. He waited 16 years to get back to the House—and he is gambling it all in his first term back to go after a powerful, well-financed senator from a mega-state in which campaigns are extremely expensive. It's hard to make sense of, really, but just like that Stockman did secure himself a very very big platform. Based on all the attention he's managed to get as a House back-bencher this year alone, imagine what he'll do and say, unleashed in a Senate campaign in which his whole goal will be to run to Cornyn's (far) right. Not that he'll have any difficulty doing that.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Tue Dec 10, 2013 at 08:30 AM PST.

Also republished by Turning Texas: Election Digest, Houston Area Kossacks, TexKos-Messing with Texas with Nothing but Love for Texans, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site