Skip to main content

So maybe it’s just me.  But the thing I found most striking about the Christie news conference yesterday was the question that didn’t get asked.  Why did it take this long for him to take a real interest in the story?

The answer seems obvious to me.  He took an interest only when the e-mail evidence was revealed.  Those e-mails came from the servers of the Port Authority, not his office.

Up until, now the response of the Christie administration was simply deny, deny deny.

They thought they could get away with it because they believed they had deleted the e-mails, no one would ever have proof.  So it would always be just “he said - she said,” one person’s word against another’s.  They figured they could survive that, or so they thought.

It’s a simple but fundamental mistake.  You have to assume there is always a record of e-mails (and texts for that matter) once they’ve been sent.  

Yesterday the Christie administration shifted dramatically from joking and denial to full damage control with the obligatory throwing of bodies under the bus; the ceremonial sacrifice.  Then of course Christie spent two hours publicly denying he knew anything about it.

My guess is he did know, he’s just counting on the record being scrubbed.  My guess though is the record is not scrubbed and the rest of the story is only a matter of time.

The theory of the retribution towards Loreeta Weinberg makes perfect sense to me, a lot more sense than the nonsense about an endorsement from a Democratic Mayor.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site