Skip to main content

The New Requirements of the Old Ethics:A perspective by Marc Tunzi MD.[*1.]
Reprinted From a: Hastings Center Report. 2013;43(2) [*2.]  as published in Medscape.
Note: Medscape articles are available on line to its members only.

Dr. Tunzi, in his publication, asks in relation to those persons left uninsured under The ACA "Who am I?" as a physician, what can be done, and to physicians, "Who are We?"

When I [Dr.Tunzi] was a kid, I used to play the "Where am I?" game. Maybe you did, too. You know: I am in my house; in Salinas, California; in the United States of America; in the world; in the solar system; in the universe. These days, I play a "Who am I?" game: I am a husband, father, and friend; an American; a Catholic and a Democrat—though I often disagree with the official positions of both affiliations; a family physician for twenty-five years and a family medicine residency faculty member for twenty years; a newly minted, Master's-trained clinical ethicist; I staff a volunteer homeless clinic once a week.
Integrating these identities is a challenge. My expertise enables me to see connections among issues that others sometimes do not see. In that context, I believe that U.S. health reform will raise many familiar ethical issues over the next several years—old issues in new forms. One of these is the fate of individuals who will still be uninsured after implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, there are 56 million uninsured people in the United States. About 30 million will be eligible for coverage via PPACA—roughly half via an expanded Medicaid program and half via the health insurance exchanges; 26 million will not be covered.[*]
And then what?

There are not enough primary care physicians to provide care for those who will have health insurance. Private medical practices will absorb many of the "exchange half" of the newly insured, but they cannot care for all of them. Public medical administrators will cry, "No money, no mission," promising to expand access quickly but focusing first on the "Medicaid half" of the newly insured in order to compensate for lost block grant revenue that will be redirected to supporting PPACA. Those who still lack coverage will likely find access unavailable.
The future uninsured will include both undocumented residents and U.S. citizens who work without employer-based insurance and would rather risk a fine ($695 per person) than purchase coverage via health insurance exchanges, regardless of federal tax credits. An informal poll of my adult children's friends confirms this. One explained, "I finally got a job—no benefits—and can barely support myself. Pay for health insurance? In a couple years."
This old "new" issue has an old "new" solution. The American Medical Association was founded in 1847 to serve and protect both patients and competent physicians. The AMA is seen as the first organized professional group, and physicians as the first professionals: highly trained individuals with a "social contract" to provide good service to their communities in exchange for the privilege of establishing their own license and peer review standards and maintaining status and income. The AMA Code of Medical Ethics directs physicians to promote "access to medical care for all people" and to "share in providing care to the indigent."
What does this social contract mean? What are we to say to our patients and communities? How are we to act? An informal poll of my colleagues suggests that we do not agree on these behaviors. One told me, "I have worked very hard to get to where I am today, and I work very hard taking care of my patients. What do you want from me?" But I think physicians' contract with society is real: we have real social benefits, and real obligations. We work hard, but we have not gotten to where we are by ourselves, and as a group, we have weathered the current economic crisis incredibly well.
I [Dr. Tunzi] propose that a minimum standard of public service activities be defined and required by all U.S. medical specialties in order to maintain board certification and/or professional society membership. These standards could be met by minimum hours of service to public-sector patients and the uninsured, by public advocacy work for universal access to medical care, or by other activities publicly advocated by each specialty. Public service activities should be tracked and reported, like continuing medical education hours.
The question for physicians (now) is this: Who are we?

References: Congressional Budget Office *, "Updated Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act," March 2012, at http://www.cbo.gov/...

[*1.] Disclosure: Marc Tunzi works at Natividad Medical Center, Salinas, California. He is not a member of the AMA.                                                                                                                   [*2.]The Hastings Center Report publishes original scholarship on issues in the areas of health, in the environment as they affect individuals,communities,and societies.  

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What we are going to have to do is relinquish (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sunspots

    the Congressional stranglehold on our currency. Capitol Hill effects rationing in two ways. On the one hand, it has delegated the distribution of currency via the Federal Reserve to member banks first. Then, after they get a "cut" in the form of unearned income from lending the dollars out, including back to the Treasury, the Congress, having refused to structure the tax code so as to bring back all the dollars as revenue, argues that having to borrow from investors constrains what they can spend on public projects.
    The whole thing isn't quite as simple as the above suggests, because by setting up the various trust funds with dedicated receipts and automatic expenditures, the Democrats (mostly) in Congress have managed to out-fox the rest. Which is where the opposition to the ACA comes from because, as the shut down demonstrated in having the sign-up continue as scheduled (even if not fluidly), health care is a $2.7 trillion funnel of dollars that is going to flow in and out of the Treasury without Congressional interference. If hospitals, for example, have a secure revenue source, they're not going to have to go hat in hand to the Congressman begging for funding for capital expansion.
    The Federal Reserve was set up on the premise that Capitol Hill cannot be trusted to manage the currency. Many on Capitol Hill have validated those low expectations. However, now they have about privatized themselves right out of influence. Which probably accounts for why so many are retiring. Legislating is no fun, if you can't be a petty tyrant.
    Anyway, this is something we the people are going to have to take care of. Must choose better agents.

    Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

    by hannah on Sun Jan 12, 2014 at 11:57:34 AM PST

  •  Um, plagiarism problem here (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Richard Cranium

    even though the diary gives the source, it is not considered OK on this site to simply reprint an entire article from another publication, without permission, and without quotation marks or block-quoting.

    I suggest the diarist check the site guidelines and edit the diary significantly into a coherent paraphrase.

    •  And, the diarist reposted on Monday, en toto n/t (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eyesbright

      It will not get easier before it gets harder. But the harder it gets, the easier it will be.

      by Richard Cranium on Mon Jan 13, 2014 at 12:29:04 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Deleting (0+ / 0-)

        This posting is not listed in my diaries list for me to click delete. I did not delete it on Sunday past since I did not know that it had been published since I could not find it when I looked for it.

        I admittedly have made a mistake in the cross posting but certainly would have appreciated some notification about it by seeing in my dollparty' s  space, top right on front page, that I had a message.

        Since you seemingly have the ability to control what is published on DK could you manage to get me set up to make comments to Diaries or other commenters?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site