Skip to main content

In recent talks with interfaith leaders and with Jewish leaders, Secretary of State John Kerry and Ambassador Martin Indyk, his lead negotiator for Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations outlined, according to John Judis at The New Republic, the framework that Secretary Kerry is going to propose to Israeli and Palestinian negotiators for a two-states-for-two-peoples peace settlement. For those of us who support such a peace settlement, or who simply want President and Obama and Secretary Kerry to succeed, it's not to early to begin mobilizing. Some of the  elements, according to Judis, are:

  • Israel recognizes Palestine as the nation of the Palestinian people; Palestinians recognize Israel as the nation of the Jewish people.
  • Through land swaps, 75-80% of Israeli settlers will remain in place.
  • Palestinian refugees would receive some sort of compensation; so would Jewish refugees who fled, and in many cases were forced to flee, Arab countries after 1947.
  • A security zone along the Jordan River would be established, consisting of electrified fences and unmanned aerial vehicles. For a specified, limited time, Israeli forces could be part of the force policing the zone.
  • Both sides may accept the framework with reservations; the United States will give its views on how the reserved issues should be resolved.


According to Judis:

People who have followed these negotiations believe that Abbas would accept with reservations this kind of framework agreement, but that Netanyahu will have difficulty doing so. Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home party and part of Netanyahu’s own Likud party would likely leave the government. Netanyahu would have to reconstitute his majority by bringing in the Labor Party and probably the ultra-orthodox Shas party. If he does that, Netanyahu will have hitched his future to the framework proposals and to the provision that the Israelis and Palestinians reach a final status agreement. It would not appear to make sense for Netanyahu to blow up his stable majority in order spend the rest of the year equivocating over details and throwing up new obstacles. So a big decision from the Israeli prime minister is in the offing, one that could determine whether there will be a two-state solution.
As Israeli blogger Marc Goldberg puts it at The Times of Israel:
The Israeli public went with [Ehud] Barack when he pushed for peace, they went with Sharon when he pushed for peace and with Olmert when he pushed for peace. When the Palestinians pushed these opportunities away the Israeli public went to the Likud. A party whose founder would be turning in his grave if he thought that the current premier was even negotiating over the land promised to the Jews by God. The Likud is a party that was created with the intention of settling that land and making it Jewish, permanently.

This must weigh on Bibi [Netanyahu] while he sits in negotiations. Now is the critical moment when he is forced to confront a changing strategic reality. One that has rendered a great deal of the security argument vis a vis the Palestinians moot.

* * *

The choice by Abbas to put down the gun but to raise the megaphone has our politicians running for cover when they should be jumping for joy. The terse statement by Defense Minister Moshe “Boogie” Ya’alon that Israel “will manage without a peace deal” lay the Likud bare. ...

I say that the truth is we can’t have it all. We took the land but we weren’t fated to make it ours. We have enough, give the Palestinians theirs, let the Americans patrol it and look to the future of Israel rather than the past.

It certainly will be possible to quibble over details of the U.S. framework for peace. In a better world, Ma'ale Adumim, site of the now famous Soda Stream factory, would revert to Palestine; Judis reports that it likely will become part of Israel. And, more importantly, there's no word yet regarding a settlement for Jerusalem.

But those of us who want to give peace a chance, to achieve a peace settlement that enables Israel and Palestine to live alongside each other in peace and, soon one hopes, in amity, need to rally round. Secretary Kerry and President Obama need to know that we have their backs. So, too, do our Representatives and Senators.

And those of us with affiliations within the American Jewish community need to let those who would speak for us know that neither we nor history will forgive them if they fail to support what may be the last bast chance to secure Israel's long-term position as a secure, prosperous, and democratic Jewish state.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (7+ / 0-)

    Shalom v' salaam; peace and wholeness

    by another American on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 10:41:03 AM PST

  •  I fully support Secretary of State John Kerry and (0+ / 0-)

    President Obama's efforts to achieve a peaceful two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. The outrageous slurs from Israel's right-wing that Kerry efforts are antisemitic are outrageous and weakens the meaning of the term.

    Whether you agree or disagree with U.S. proposals are not, to accuse a statesmen with as noble a history of public service of antisemitism is deeply regrettable.

    Progressive Democrats need to counter Aipac's efforts to ally the U.S. with the positions of right-wing extremists in order to be able to support our own views of how to best support a fair pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian peaceful solution.

    When right-wing extremists use allegations of antisemitism against anyone who disagrees with extreme right-wing politicians they false exploit this concept in a self-detrimental way similar to how the right-wing in the U.S. use to misuse the term "un-American" to ostracize and belittle all those that opposed their unwise wars.

    But, middle-eastern politics is so incredibly complicated I believe we all need to put these issues on our "learning agenda," so we can better contribute to better outcomes and help our President and Secretary of State to find a viable path to a better future in this area.


    The means is the ends in the process of becoming. - Mahatma Gandhi

    by HoundDog on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 12:53:25 PM PST

  •  One part I really don't like, is when Indyk went (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    on to say:

    Indyk warned that for the United States the deal would be extremely expensive. The United States would have to help pay for refugee resettlement, the redeployment of the Israeli Defense Forces, the security zone itself, the new Palestinian state. “You name it,” Indyk said. Kerry and his staff have reportedly briefed some members of Congress on these details.
    Can someone explain why the US would have to help pay for refugee resettlement and redeployment of the IDF?

    If reality clashes with your belief, then the problem clearly is reality.--God

    by Flyswatterbanjo on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 01:00:05 PM PST

  •  We took a big economic hit from (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the Arab oil boycott resulting from the 1973 war. We've devoted considerable resources over the years to the region. Of course, not everything revolves around Israel-Palestine, but much does. And the danger is that future wars would be even more expensive, as well as dangerous to our position in the world.

    Shalom v' salaam; peace and wholeness

    by another American on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 01:17:40 PM PST

  •  I support our President's policy and look (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    another American, whizdom

    forward to a peaceful resolution with two states for two peoples.

    "Stay close to the candles....the staircase can be treacherous" (-8.38,-8.51)

    by JNEREBEL on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 03:09:01 PM PST

  •  How is this different? (0+ / 0-)

    I'm just wondering- how is this different from the peace that "everyone knew how it was going to turn out?" That is, there have been posts on DailyKos for years- and elsewhere, as well- that basically mirrored this.  It's essentially Camp David and Taba and so on all over again.  So what makes this more likely to succeed?

    •  It's substantially similar because anyone (0+ / 0-)

      with eyes in her head knows what a peace settlement has to look like. What may be different is the combination of a dedicated American administration and a Palestinian leader at last willing to make the necessary compromises for peace alongside an Israeli populace still supportive of a peace settlement if they're persuaded that their security needs are met.

      Shalom v' salaam; peace and wholeness

      by another American on Thu Feb 06, 2014 at 05:04:15 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well said, but (0+ / 0-)

        do not minimize the effort that will need to be made to get Bibi to give a public "ok" to this. This agreement goes against much of what he has said and campaigned on over many years. He will likely have to turn to his opponents in the center-left parties for his political survival if he moves forward after Kerry presents his initiative, and will likely face the Nazi accusations that Rabin faced from the Israeli right when he pursued peace before his assassination.

        While I think it is possible Bibi moves forward with this, I don't think it is a given.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site