Skip to main content

In this New York Times column this morning the Nobel Laureate in Economics takes apart the one percent and the Republican party in how they view - and talk about - work.  Starting with remarks by Paul Ryan on "the dignity of work" Krugman lays out the framework in this paragraph:

It’s all very well to talk in the abstract about the dignity of work, but to suggest that workers can have equal dignity despite huge inequality in pay is just silly. In 2012, the top 40 hedge fund managers and traders were paid a combined $16.7 billion, equivalent to the wages of 400,000 ordinary workers. Given that kind of disparity, can anyone really believe in the equal dignity of work?
The heart of his column is found in three paragraphs:  
Think about it: Has anything done as much to enhance the dignity of American seniors, to rescue them from the penury and dependence that were once so common among the elderly, as Social Security and Medicare? Inside the Beltway, fiscal scolds have turned “entitlements” into a bad word, but it’s precisely the fact that Americans are entitled to collect Social Security and be covered by Medicare, no questions asked, that makes these programs so empowering and liberating.

Conversely, the drive by conservatives to dismantle much of the social safety net, to replace it with minimal programs and private charity, is, in effect, an effort to strip away the dignity of lower-income workers.

And it’s something else: an assault on their freedom.

That's all I will quote from this magnificent, must read column.

Below the fold just a very few words of my own.

The attitude of too many with wealth and in the other party is that people should be grateful for whatever they are paid.  Thus they argue  

- for continuing the ridiculous tipped-minimum wage
- for a lower minimum wage for teenagers
- for so-called right-to-work laws to prevent workers from organizing for fair compensation
- against application of work rules that protect workers environmentally
- against application of labor laws that require overtime and weekend/holiday differential
- against being required to provide health insurance for their workforce
- against paid family/medical leave
- for the right to consider all workers "at will"
- against the right of public workers to "tenure" of any kind
- for lower tax rates for passively earned income - capital gains, profits from hedge funds
  (the so-called carried interest provision)
- against raising the cap on income subject to Social Security taxes
- for cutting the benefits available under Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid
- against the earned income tax credit

Please tell me where a single one of these provisions upholds the idea of the dignity of work?

For those of us who are teachers, whose work should be considered as important as any in this country, they want to take away our freedom, our professional judgment, our right to bargain collectively, cut our pay, charge us more for our medical insurance - in no way do any of these represent an affirmation of the dignity of our work

Krugman tells us that we should, if we believe in the dignity of work, celebrate Obamacare.

That's in his final paragraph.

But let me stretch fair use and end with his penultimate paragraph, since I have actually quoted so little:

The truth is that if you really care about the dignity and freedom of American workers, you should favor more, not fewer, entitlements, a stronger, not weaker, social safety net.
Yep.

And Peace?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site