Skip to main content

In the face of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the conservative echo chamber chants in unison, President Obama has been "weak" and "feckless" and is wearing "mom jeans," which "invites aggression." For the likes of Lindsey Graham, Sarah Palin and most of all John McCain, those are pretty shameless statements to make. After all, when Putin's forces battered Georgia in the 2008 conflict its president helped precipitate, McCain insisted the Bush administration should not be the target of "partisan sniping." More embarrassing still, if any of Obama's former rivals turned fiercest critics had made it to the White House, Osama Bin Laden would still be alive today. And we know this, because they told us so.

As you'll recall, during his first run for president then Senator Barack Obama explained what leadership in the war against Al Qaeda looked like. "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act," Obama declared on August 1, 2007, of Bin Laden's fighters safely ensconced in Pakistan, "we will." He repeated that promise in July 2008:

"The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as President, I won't. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps, and to crack down on cross-border insurgents...We must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights."
But is precisely what President Bush and would have been Republican Presidents John McCain and Mitt Romney insisted they would not do.

Please read below the fold for more on this story.

On October 21, 2008, Sarah Palin blasted Senator Obama for "having advocated sending our U.S. military into Pakistan without the approval of the Pakistani government, invading the sovereign territory of a troubled partner in the war against terrorism." Of course, she was just following orders from her running mate, John McCain.

During his failed run for the Oval Office, Senator McCain declared that "I know how to win wars." And when it came to catching the mastermind behind the slaughter of 3,000 people on September 11, 2001, McCain boasted, "We will do it, I know how to do it." As he repeatedly promised:

"We will do whatever is necessary. We will track him down. We will capture him. We will bring him to justice, and I will follow him to the gates of Hell."
But as it turned out, the gates of Hell were located in Abbottabad, Pakistan. And John McCain was too afraid to go there and do what was necessary.

In 2003 and 2004, McCain proclaimed, "Nobody in Afghanistan threatens the United States of America" and "Afghanistan, we don't read about anymore, because it's succeeded." Throughout the 2008 campaign, Senator McCain insisted that, unlike Senator Obama, he would not "take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights," as this exchange with CNN's Larry King revealed:

KING: If you were president and knew that bin Laden was in Pakistan, you know where, would you have U.S. forces go in after him?

MCCAIN: Larry, I'm not going to go there and here's why, because Pakistan is a sovereign nation. I think the Pakistanis would want bin Laden out of their hair and out of their country and it's causing great difficulties in Pakistan itself.

In February 2008, John McCain blasted Obama's hard line on Al Qaeda's safe havens again:
"Will we risk the confused leadership of an inexperienced candidate who once suggested invading our ally, Pakistan?"
Obama, of course, had said no such thing. Nevertheless, McCain was joined in his criticism by the man he wanted to succeed, President George W. Bush.

Asked by Chris Wallace of Fox News in February 2008 if "voters know enough about him," Bush replied:

"I certainly don't know what he believes in. The only foreign policy thing I remember he said was he's going to attack Pakistan."
While he began to ramp up the use of drones in the final year of presidency, Bush refused to send U.S. forces across the border into the tribal areas of Pakistan to go after Bin Laden and other terrorist targets. In 2005, his Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld cancelled a U.S. special forces operation designed to "snatch and grab" Ayman al-Zawahiri and other senior Al Qaeda leaders. The revelation, following July 2006 revelations that the CIA had previously disbanded its Bin Laden unit, gave lie to one of the central tenets of the so-called Bush Doctrine: no safe havens for terrorists. As the New York Times reported in July 2007, Rumsfeld ran roughshod over then CIA Director Porter Goss, scuttling the mission at the last moment even as the U.S. forces were boarding planes for the assault. Americans could be forgiven for taking President Bush at his word after Bin Laden escaped from Tora Bora in early 2002:
"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you...I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."
Bush's brain, Karl Rove, became very concerned about Bin Laden, but only after President Barack Obama ordered the mission that killed him.
As for the killing of Osama bin Laden, Mr. Obama did what virtually any commander in chief would have done in the same situation. Even President Bill Clinton says in the film "I hope that's the call I would have made." For this to be portrayed as the epic achievement of the first term tells you how bare the White House cupboards are.
President Obama's 2012 opponent, Mitt Romney, said much the same thing. Romney brushed off Obama's achievement in an interview with MSNBC's Chuck Todd:
"I think in a setting like this one where Osama bin Laden was identified to be hiding in Pakistan, that it was entirely appropriate for this president to move in and to take him out," Romney replied, later adding that "In a similar circumstance, I think other presidents and other candidates, like myself, would do exactly the same thing."
Alas, during his first bid for the presidency, Mitt Romney made clear that a candidate like himself would not do exactly the same thing:
"I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours ... I don't think those kinds of comments help in this effort to draw more friends to our effort ... "There is a war being waged by terrorists of different types and nature across the world," Romney said. "We want, as a civilized world, to participate with other nations in this civilized effort to help those nations reject the extreme with them."
As it turned out, of course, Romney, Bush, McCain, Palin and their conservative allies were all wrong. When American national security and the demands of justice required real presidential leadership and courage, they all failed the test President Obama passed.
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site