Someone [i wont highlight them] noticed in my recent bloody diary that bringing the minimum wage into the equation was just being silly and in no way could it stretch that far.
Apparently I wasn't the only one being silly
When Clement tried to deflect this list, Kagan came armed with an even bigger what. What of religious employers who object to gender equality, or the minimum wage, or family medical leave, or child labor laws? If the Supreme Court agrees with Hobby Lobby’s brief, which argues that laws burdening a corporation’s purported religious faith must survive the “most demanding test known to constitutional law,” then there would be few laws corporations could not exempt themselves from following.
So if I was being silly then Justice Kagan was being what exactly?
This is a dipping the waters into the putrid pool of Citizens United and the possibility that corporations might just be people too my friend.
Where do you draw the line?
Apparently Justice Kagan and myself are thinking along similar lines.
Ain't we silly?
This whole Hobby Lobby case is just a fraud, it is merely to see just how far citizens united can be pushed.
Religion is just the excuse not the reason.