Skip to main content


Feinstein said the [CIA torture report] declassification vote now likely will be April 3 ...[after]... Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats ... have added substantially to the material they want made public from their study ... added 100 pages to the study’s 300-page executive summary. ...The full report, which cost $40 million and runs in excess of 6,300 pages, likely won’t ever be released.
More on winners and losers below the jump.

McClatchy's quotes of explanations (which require no further explanation):

“The reason for the delay is a couple of members wanted more time to go over the material,” [Feinstein] said.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, agreed more time was needed to read the revamped version. After all, she said, “It’s a work in progress.”

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said the holdup is partly because some members want more time to read the report, and partly because some Republicans “object to everything.”

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., another committee member, insisted there were errors in the report, though he would not specify what. But he expected separate Republican views to be issued when the report is final.


1.    The CIA, for finally paying a price for its overreach in torture and cover-up.

2.    Foreign security agencies and governments, for losing the ability to easily justify their actions by saying “our secrecy and torture comply with the international standards ratified by the CIA and the USA”.

3.    ME-Sen Susan Collins, for having the hollowness of her self-professed moderation highlighted by her transparent participation in Republican attempts to subordinate the public interest to the CIA’s and the Republican Party’s interests in avoiding embarrassment and accountability.


1.    American public, by learning 1/3 more information about what has been done, with what effectiveness, in their name, and at their expense, and by being reassured that there is still substance in the USA’s governing principles of “checks and balances” and “separation of powers”

2.    Advocates for disclosure of the entire 6300 page report, by obtaining 1/3 more public evidence that continued secrecy serves mainly the bureaucratic interests of the CIA and the political interests of Republicans and other supporters of immoral and illegal activities.

3.    Democratic Senators Mark Udall, Dianne Feinstein and Harry Reid, who will have protected the Senate’s political relevance by imposing penalty on the CIA for trying to intimidate the Senate Intelligence Committee.

4.    Every future potential target of the CIA’s previously easy and perhaps customary intimidation of low-visibility suspects and other ‘enemies’ and rivals for political power and budgetary allocations.

5.    The US military, for having been less willing to rush into torture, and more willing to admit its mistakes, than the CIA.

6.    ME-Sen Angus King, for having an opportunity to highlight his understanding that Senatorial independence in today’s politics requires voting against Republican Senators.

7.    ME-Sen candidate Shenna Bellows, for the national highlighting of her signature issue of (and her opponent Collins’ political vulnerability on) protecting civil liberties against the worst excesses of the security state’s tendencies toward panic, groupthink, barbarity, lawlessness, secrecy, power-accumulation and corruption.

3:57 AM PT: Two bits of background:

Coburn's insistence on "errors" and prediction of "separate Republican views" should be considered in light of the recent disclosure that all Republican members of the committee have boycotted the investigation and preparation of the report. This is one of the "buried ledes" in this diary:

Collins' subordination of the public interest to partisan interests was previously clarified by her staff's comment (when Collins herself refused to comment) that her primary goal is to "ensure that the report ... does not become a political issue that can be used by either party," as reported here:

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site