Skip to main content

When launched there were many concerns about the administrations 'insider threat program'. Not only was it overly intrusive into the lives of government workers, it fostered a climate of paranoia:

Even before a former U.S. intelligence contractor exposed the secret collection of Americans’ phone records, the Obama administration was pressing a government-wide crackdown on security threats that requires federal employees to keep closer tabs on their co-workers and exhorts managers to punish those who fail to report their suspicions.

President Barack Obama’s unprecedented initiative, known as the Insider Threat Program, is sweeping in its reach. It has received scant public attention even though it extends beyond the U.S. national security bureaucracies to most federal departments and agencies nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security Administration and the Education and Agriculture departments. It emphasizes leaks of classified material, but catchall definitions of “insider threat” give agencies latitude to pursue and penalize a range of other conduct.

Some non-intelligence agencies already are urging employees to watch their co-workers for “indicators” that include stress, divorce and financial problems.

Of course one of the main concerns was the ITP would stifle legitimate whistle-blowing:

As part of the initiative, Obama ordered greater protection for whistleblowers who use the proper internal channels to report official waste, fraud and abuse, but that’s hardly comforting to some national security experts and current and former U.S. officials. They worry that the Insider Threat Program won’t just discourage whistleblowing but will have other grave consequences for the public’s right to know and national security.

The program could make it easier for the government to stifle the flow of unclassified and potentially vital information to the public, while creating toxic work environments poisoned by unfounded suspicions and spurious investigations of loyal Americans, according to these current and former officials and experts

In one of his more useful functions in the Senate, Chuck Grassley has been a long time advocate of whistleblower protection, and had some concerns which he listed in a long speech on the Whistleblower Protection Act.

One of the more shocking claims? Grassley said  that he asked the Federal Bureau of Information for Insider Threat Program training materials four months ago, but was told to schedule a hearing instead to have his questions answered. I will let Grassley explain what happened after he scheduled said hearing along with Pat Leahy:

Meanwhile, the FBI fiercely resists any efforts at Congressional oversight, especially on whistleblower matters.  For example, four months ago I sent a letter to the FBI requesting its training materials on the Insider Threat Program.  This program was announced by the Obama Administration in October 2011.  It was intended to train federal employees to watch out for insider threats among their colleagues.  Public news reports indicated that this program might not do enough to distinguish between true insider threats and legitimate whistleblowers.  I relayed these concerns in my letter.  I also asked for copies of the training materials.  I said I wanted to examine whether they adequately distinguished between insider threats and whistleblowers.

In response, an FBI legislative affairs official told my staff that a briefing might be the best way to answer my questions.  It was scheduled for last week.  Staff for both Chairman Leahy and I attended, and the FBI brought the head of their Insider Threat Program.  Yet the FBI didn’t bring the Insider Threat training materials as we had requested.  However, the head of the Insider Threat Program told the staff that there was no need to worry about whistleblower communications.  He said whistleblowers had to register in order to be protected, and the Insider Threat Program would know to just avoid those people.

Now I have never heard of whistleblowers being required to “register” in order to be protected.  The idea of such a requirement should be pretty alarming to all Americans.  Sometimes confidentiality is the best protection a whistleblower has.  Unfortunately, neither my staff nor Chairman Leahy’s staff was able to learn more, because only about ten minutes into the briefing, the FBI abruptly walked out.  FBI officials simply refused to discuss any whistleblower implications in its Insider Threat Program and left the room.  These are clearly not the actions of an agency that is genuinely open to whistleblowers or whistleblower protection.

How is that for transparency? Grassley went on with more information on the real-time monitoring of gov. employees:
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper seems to have talked about such procedures when he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 11, 2014.  In his testimony, he said:

We are going to proliferate deployment of auditing and monitoring capabilities to enhance our insider threat detection.  We’re going to need to change our security clearance process to a system of continuous evaluation. . . .  What we need is . . . a system of continuous evaluation, where . . . we have a way of monitoring their behavior, both their electronic behavior on the job as well as off the job, to see if there is a potential clearance issue. . . .

Director Clapper’s testimony gives me major pause.  It sounds as though this type of monitoring would likely capture the activity of whistleblowers communicating with Congress.

Originally posted to LieparDestin on Thu Apr 17, 2014 at 04:53 AM PDT.

Also republished by 11111000000 and Whistleblowers Round Table.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, bink, Alumbrados, paradox, cslewis, Sylv, nota bene, KeithH, teacherken, Liberal Thinking, native, Gooserock, Rolfyboy6, greenbird, Shockwave, Wintermute, eeff, DFWmom, RFK Lives, hubcap, niemann, Creosote, Gustogirl, Zinman, whenwego, Agathena, ask, boadicea, phillies, farmerhunt, roses, CanisMaximus, vmckimmey, Nate Roberts, sidnora, kharma, psnyder, businessdem, ranger995, white blitz, JimWilson, Steven Payne, lcrp, Dood Abides, Wayward Wind, Diana in NoVa, ybruti, randallt, Black Max, Emmy, solesse413, xxdr zombiexx, Gowrie Gal, sb, nailbender, davidincleveland, radarlady, UncleCharlie, chimene, basquebob, dewtx, ChemBob, snacksandpop, viral, Brooke In Seattle, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, Byrnt, eru, owlbear1, bleeding blue, Sun Tzu, where4art, GreyHawk, Kayakbiker, Overseas, lotlizard, most peculiar mama, Eric K, markdd, Sandino, Tool, rb608, brentut5, WisePiper, Shotput8, bookwoman, peacestpete, mrchips46, xaxnar, Jim R, Jim P, berko, LeftOverAmerica, Medium Head Boy, Kingsmeg, vigilant meerkat, 417els, Mr Bojangles, BlueInARedState, dharmafarmer, cardboardurinal, Arabiflora, bastrop, Dvalkure, koNko, AoT, KenBee, raincrow, blueoasis, triv33, MJ via Chicago, StrayCat, philipmerrill, twigg, 4Freedom, The Hindsight Times, Rosaura, gooderservice, novapsyche, JVolvo, NearlyNormal, el cid, ER Doc, llbear, Turbonerd, onionjim, IL clb, CA Nana, doingbusinessas, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, suspiciousmind, kurt, shaharazade, Tom Anderson, bstotts, Friend of the court, markthshark, OHdog, NonnyO, krwheaton, ammasdarling, One Pissed Off Liberal, wa ma, Jarrayy, Debs2, devis1, la urracca, tbirchard, Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle, suejazz, Shadowmage36, aliasalias, HCKAD, jayden, TrueBlueMountaineer, bobswern, millwood, gaardvark, leonard145b, JML9999, eyesoars, spearfish, Don midwest, Empower Ink, rmonroe, MKinTN, CroneWit, also mom of 5, GAS, zerone, OleHippieChick, Youffraita, Thomas Twinnings, Involuntary Exile, Calamity Jean, Lujane, No Exit, temptxan, codairem, glendaw271, petulans, elpacifico66, BYw, lenzy1000, HarpboyAK, billybam, rhutcheson, watercarrier4diogenes, shortgirl, CIndyCasella, legendmn, LaFeminista, pileta, cybrestrike, J M F, ceebee7, greengemini, lostinamerica, ewmorr, Carol in San Antonio, CanyonWren, maryabein, Norm in Chicago, Methinks They Lie, mkor7, JesseCW, dRefractor, petral, jomi, kevinpdx, jfromga, nancat357, astral66, Just Bob, commonmass, confitesprit, flitedocnm, roadbear, The Jester, Crabby Abbey, 2questions, Klaus, cordgrass, gulfgal98, samanthab, Lady Libertine, Johnny Q, Publius2008, Betty Pinson, Floande, Oh Mary Oh, slice, Onomastic, spooks51, slowbutsure, FarWestGirl, Teiresias70, trumpeter, marleycat, thomask, tardis10, createpeace, PhilJD, sound of progress, Vatexia, Sunspots, leftykook, dradams, DRo, Regina in a Sears Kit House, SouthernLiberalinMD, Laurel in CA, livingthedream, quill, sow hat, greenbastard, IndieGuy, Trevin, 420 forever, FreeSpeaker, Horace Boothroyd III, Mr Robert, Mike RinRI, Arahahex, aznavy, lunachickie, Brown Thrasher, AverageJoe42, ItsaMathJoke, George3, wasatch, katiec, madcitysailor, Chaddiwicker, countwebb, jbob, mizglory, 84thProblem, goodpractice, HedwigKos, emorej a Hong Kong, aresea, ORswede, northerntier, GreenMother, Ysmene, ET3117, Jim Domenico, amparo fan, Portia Elm, Halfton81, CenPhx, eagleray, Penny GC, occupystephanie, Choco8, Cadillac64, BMScott, alypse1

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site