Skip to main content

In the United States, people concerned about climate change focus much of their energy on how to communicate the facts about climate in the face of a well-funded campaign of disinformation on the topic.  In much of the rest of the world, people are simply dealing with the reality of climate change that can be observed in their region, and the change that is to come.

When people see change in the world around them, they make adjustments as much as they are able. One type of adjustment is to look for new opportunities for economic gain. The recently published book Windfall, by McKenzie Funk, describes efforts by people, companies, and even entire countries (and potential  countries-to-be) to make a profit from changes in the world’s climate.

This leads to very serious moral questions, illustrated in Windfall by examples throughout the world. Who profits, and who suffers?

Canadian soldier guards the newly melted Northwest Passage from foreign invaders

Making a profit is not, by itself, a bad thing, a point that Funk is careful to make in the book and also when he speaks. As he puts it, “The people I write about are generally good people who believe that they are doing good, or at least not something bad.”

The examples in the book illustrate that, in many cases, the potential for profit arises from the need for important and helpful services. Who could fault the Dutch for making a living by exporting their skill in building seawalls? If Israeli inventors have a better snowmaking technology based on their research into desalinization, it’s a great idea for them to find buyers in the Alps, whose ski areas are increasingly starved of snow. The people of Greenland see an opportunity to achieve independent statehood, at long last, partly through new resources revealed by the receding ice.

New life for an old mine in Greenland
From there, the moral questions get more and more dodgy. Between India and Bangladesh, the border fence was originally created for reasons other than repelling climate refugees, but stiffening the boundary has assumed a new urgency as the seas rise on low-lying Bangladesh.
Keeping the climate refugees out
Just north of the border between the United States and Mexico, a project to prevent the “loss” of water by lining the All-American Canal with concrete will result in serious consequences for Mexican farmers who depend on the underground movement of that water.
Water: Mine mine mine!
One notable constant is this: The valuable services to respond to climate change are generally available only to those who can pay. In the Netherlands, those Dutch seawall engineers are spending three billion dollars engineering a solution for the rising Maas River, while they eye the opportunity to help build a great New York City wall system that could cost more than twice that.

Meanwhile, island nations with insufficient currency find themselves facing the prospect of their demise as independent states. At conference held at Columbia University in 2011, experts discussed methods for a nation to continue to exist after its land is underwater or uninhabitable – floating islands, towed into place, are one possibility. Another choice is to recognize a “nation ex-situ” that exists as a trusteeship, entirely in order to receive climate reparation payments and distribute them to their exiled population.

Pony up if you want your seawall
An iconic moment in Windfall occurs during the tale of the private “firefighters”, whose task is to scurry around in advance of wildfires and douse flame retardant chemicals in the homes covered by certain insurance policies – but only those homes. While they dress the part of actual firefighters, these crews have no intention of actually fighting the fire.
[Just as the crew finished spraying one of their listed homes with fire retardant,] a neighbor appeared. She seemed to have mistaken Chief Sam for a public firefighter, and all of us attempted to play along. “You could get right to the fire at the second property down, at Las Palmas, she said.

“Okay, okay,” Chief Sam said. The air filled with smoke.

“I’ve got trails in here,” she said. “You can pull all the way in.” She pointed down the street, toward the flames, waiting expectantly.

“Okay,” Chief Sam said, barely looking at her, “We’ve got more resources coming.”

This scene summarizes a core dilemma facing the world with respect to climate change. Who will act together for everyone’s benefit, and who will fend only for themselves? Will anyone be willing to turn away from newly revealed resources? Private solutions are usually much less effective than their public analogs (witness the private firefighters who don’t actually fight fires), but those with the means to protect themselves or profit from climate change will be strongly motivated to do whatever gets them ahead, and also to defend the rightness of their actions.

In the concluding chapter of Windfall, Funk writes:

The hardest truth about climate change is that it is not equally bad for everyone. Some people – the rich, the northern – will find ways to thrive while others cannot, and many people will wall themselves off from the worst effects of warming while others remain on the wrong side. …

Climate change is often framed as a scientific or economic or environmental issue, and not often enough as an issue of human justice. This too needs to change.

The book will be an eye opener for anyone whose entire climate focus is on advocating for emission reductions. I asked the author whether efforts to reduce emissions even mattered any more. “Every quantity of reduction will matter,” he said. “But there is enough warming already baked into the current situation that we are going to have to face the facts of continued warming, and the justice and fairness issues that come along with that reality.”
Melting is already baked in
Windfall covers these serious issues with very personal, often humorous, in-person reporting, based on the author’s travels over six years. The book portrays decisions made by people who find themselves in places and circumstances where actions that might have seemed unlikely or even absurd a few years ago are simply reasonable responses to the world today. Reasonable, at least, as seen from each individual viewpoint.

References:

Thanks to McKenzie Funk for an interview, his reading at Village Books, and for Windfall. His site is mckenziefunk.com.

All photos in this diary are copyright McKenzie Funk, used with permission.

Windfall is available at great local bookstores like Village Books (a much better idea than ordering from that evil web retailer whose name evokes the image of a fiercely independent traditional people). Quotes are from the text of Windfall, from our interview, or from the reading.

Several events and issues in this article are summarized from chapters in Windfall. Examples include: Greenland’s push for independence, the India-Bangladesh border fence, Dutch seawall builders, the Columbia University conference on legal implications of sea level rise, Israeli snow making technology, and the All-American canal lining project.

This article was originally published in the April 2014 issue of Whatcom Watch - linky

Originally posted to James Wells on Sat Apr 19, 2014 at 08:08 AM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS, Kitchen Table Kibitzing, and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site