Skip to main content

John Stewart's recent  skit on Fox "news' (sic) outrage on Benghazi, while rightly pointing out Fox's hypocritical false outrage, ultimately does it's viewers a disservice  by promoting the false narrative propagated by  Fox "news" (sic) that Benghazi was a result of a terrorist organization's planned attack and  that the Obama administration cynically pushed false talking points downplaying  this fact. From The stewart piece...

Well, now it looks like this Ben Rhodes, a White House national security and communications aide, did add to these talking points, emphasizing that the protests surrounding the Benghazi violence were not coordinated by terrorists, but were instead somehow related to a provocative anti-Muslim video that had caused demonstrations in other countries
Stewart- after a insipid Joke focusing on Snow Dogs, goes on to say
I will say this.  From that e-mail, it sounds like the White House had politics and elections on their mind when they sent Susan Rice to the Sunday shows.  It's deplorable.
Really John? Deplorable. Well I guess it does SOUND like that, if you believe the Fox news narrative. Fortunately someone who is an actual journalist looked into this and - hey, guess what ... That FOX Narrative about doctored talking points (that you seem so willing to believe)  is BULLSHIT and SHAME ON YOU for buying into it-
follow after the fold

As the New York Times points out in their actual reporting on Benghazi

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.
further more
contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it (the Benghazi attack)  was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.
Mr Stewart- if as the New York times asserts, the events of Benghazi largely unfolded  EXACTLY as the Obama administration initially suggested, how was their handling of the talking points deplorable? I guess if Mr Stewart chooses to believe the Fox "News" (sic) narrative over the investigative reporting done by the NY Times, that's his prerogative, but it seems his own climb up bullshit mountain in the name of false equivalency shows a hypocrisy of his own

Stewart's claim about Fox News hypocrisy may score points with some on the left ( and thanks to this article - which is largely uncritical of Stewart, but did give me the quotes from the show )

However, Stewart is mostly lazily aping the Fox "news" (sic)  narrative of the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi when making points about Fox's Hypocrisy.

The real story is not that Fox is Hypocritical, but they are actively pushing a lie about the events surrounding Benghazi- and Now Stewart too has been unwittingly duped in to pushing that same lie

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site