Skip to main content

Paul Garver writes on the Talking Union blog:

The international coordinated actions of fast food workers on May 15th represent a new and unprecedented level of global labor solidarity.

Activists have long called for international labor solidarity to confront global corporations. The global fast food industry presents an excellent example of an industry dominated by a few giant corporations like McDonalds whose chief executives receive 1200 times higher pay than their fast food workers. The industry takes in over $200 billion annually, while employing tens of millions of low paid workers in hundreds of countries.

On the surface, it seemed impossible to organize fast food workers on a global scale to confront the likes of McDonalds. In the USA as well as in most of the world, the corporations franchise their individual operations to smaller so-called “independent” businesses, while retaining total control over every key aspect of their operations. Fast food workers in any given outlet in any country are usually relatively few in number, under the direct supervision of their shop managers, and precariously employed by third parties other than the global fast food corporations. Labor law in the USA and most other countries is ill adapted to facilitate worker representation and collective bargaining of fast food workers.

In a few countries where collective bargaining takes place at the industry level, such as Germany, France, the Nordic countries and Switzerland, unions were able to gain small toeholds over the last decade. Although they were able to bargain collectively in the fast food sector, and somewhat improve wages and working conditions, those unions usually could not recruit enough voluntary union members from the part-time work force to become strong. Almost uniquely in New Zealand, a determined union membership has been willing to conduct repeated if brief strikes to raise wages.

In the USA there has been almost no formal union representation in the fast food industry. The dramatic developments since 2012 are now changing the situation. Since then the SEIU has poured significant resources into community-based organizations and worker centers throughout the USA to catalyze what has become a visible national swelling of fast food worker organization, propelling with it a powerful movement for raising the minimum wage for all workers. It is evident that this organizing effort has struck a powerful chord among many fast food workers.

Global coordination is through the IUF (Uniting Food, Farm and Hotel Workers Worldwide). The IUF, with SEIU support, held a global meeting of 80 fast food workers and union representatives from 26 countries in New York in the week prior to the May 15th actions. Many of the foreign delegates to this meeting remained in the USA to help organize the protest actions in American cities. On the 15th strikes or protest actions took place in 158 American cities and 93 international cities across 36 countries, with a few more occurring for the 16th.

According to IUF General Secretary Ron Oswald, "The Fight for 15 in the US has caught the attention of workers around the world in a global fast-food industry where workers have recently been mobilizing. It has inspired them to join together internationally in a fight for higher pay and better rights on the job. This is just the beginning of an unprecedented international fast-food worker movement-and this highly profitable global industry better take note."

Paul Garver is a retired organizer for the IUF and before that for SEIU. He takes no credit for organizing these actions, nor blame for their not occurring earlier.

Originally posted to Talking Union on Fri May 16, 2014 at 11:27 PM PDT.

Also republished by Hellraisers Journal and In Support of Labor and Unions.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Excellent report. Thank you. (0+ / 0-)

    Extremely important. I'm sure it varies by jurisdiction, but is the organizing aiming toward full union recognition or some other form with less government barriers?

    Also, do the part-time workers get invited in as equal partners? There is so much exploitation of part-time workers. They usually desperately want full-time work but the companies purposely avoid letting people get to 40 hours. Companies like Walmart are notorious for that. Companies should have to pay full or at least proportionate benefits for part-time workers to remove the disincentive to make them full-time.

    garden variety democratic socialist: accepting life's complexity|striving for global stewardship of our soil and other resources to meet everyone's basic needs|being a friend to the weak

    by Galtisalie on Sat May 17, 2014 at 01:48:40 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site