Skip to main content

  A few weeks ago President Obama doubled down on Washington's failed strategy in the middle east by asking for another $500 million to "train and equip appropriately vetted elements of the moderate Syrian armed opposition."

   If Joseph Heller were alive today, he would be having quite the laugh. But he would understand if you weren't laughing with him.

 In Heller's dark comedy, Catch-22, the protagonist Captain John Yossarian, is befriended by Lieutenant Milo Minderbinder.
   Minderbinder is a war profiteer during World War II. Eventually he begins contracting out to the Germans, with his forces often fighting on both sides of battles, including bombing his own squadron.
  Milo was court-martialed for that, but his enterprise was so profitable that he is absolved of wrongdoing.

Territory controled by ISIS

   Arming "moderate" opposition forces in Syria has been the Washington strategy for years now. The problem is that even Washington knows that they aren't moderate. If they were moderate, the Obama Administration wouldn't have taken a legal precaution last year.
   Last September, while Obama spoke of "vetted" forces from one side of his face, he did this from the other side.

     President Obama waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups to clear the way for the U.S. to provide military assistance to “vetted” opposition groups fighting Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.
    Some elements of the Syrian opposition are associated with radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, which was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., in 2001. Assad’s regime is backed by Iran and Hezbollah.
    The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”
 If these forces were truly "vetted" then this wouldn't have been necessary. In fact, just a week earlier Mother Jones Magazine reported just how flawed the vetting process was.  The reality on the ground is that it is almost impossible to distinguish between the "good guys" and the "bad guys" in the Syrian civil war.

  In fact, the situation on the ground was worse than anything even the cynics could have guessed. A study by IHS Jane's, a defence consultancy, estimated that out of the 100,000 rebel fighters, 10,000 of them were jihadists, and another 35,000 were aligned with the jihadists. In fact, the number of true secular nationalists probably numbered at less than a tenth of the rebels.
   The real kicker is that at the exact same time that President Obama was signing a waver against funding terrorists in Syria, IHS Jane's was reporting this:

 Two factions linked to al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra and the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) - also know as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) - have come to dominate among the more extremist fighters, Mr Lister said.
 This was less than three months before ISIS took control of Falujah in Iraq, and only eight months before they seized half of Iraq. Is it a coincidence that we started arming "moderate" rebels in Syria, that were dominated by al-Nursa and ISIS (which have since merged), then they suddenly gain sweeping military success? Not likely.

  In fact, there has been evidence that rebel weapons had been flowing to jihadists in Syria for some time.

 Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar al-Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster, according to American officials and Middle Eastern diplomats.
   “The opposition groups that are receiving the most of the lethal aid are exactly the ones we don’t want to have it,” said one American official familiar with the outlines of those findings, commenting on an operation that in American eyes has increasingly gone awry.
 While President Obama lifted the ban on giving weapons to terrorists in 2013, we were shipping heavy weapons to Syria at least a year earlier. The U.S. bought stockpiles of heavy weapons left over in Libya after the fall of Gaddafi. That includes anti-tank and anti-aircraft missles.
 in October we reported evidence indicating that U.S. agents — particularly murdered ambassador Chris Stevens — were at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.
 That's October of 2012 when U.S. agents knew that our heavy weapons from Libya were going to jihadists in Syria.

  Speaking of Libya, there is an impression that it is better off now, despite the fact that Libya's Foreign Minister Mohamed Abdelaziz has asked the U.N. for peacekeeping forcesand is warning that Libya is becoming a failed state.

  Meanwhile in Iraq, the government attempt at retaking Tikrit from ISIS has ended in complete failure. It was the worst defeat since the post-Mosul surge of a month ago.

   So what do we do, Mister Heller? We double down, of course.

 The disintegration of Iraq is the result of U.S. policies that, since 2003, have been strikingly devoid of coherence or any real comprehension when it comes to the forces at play in the country or the region. They have had about them an aura of puerility, of “good guys” versus “bad guys,” that will leave future historians stunned. Worst of all, they have generated a modern-day Middle Eastern Catch-22 in which all sides are armed, funded, and supported directly or indirectly by Washington or its allies.
 And yet, in typical American fashion based on both hubris and ignorance, the American public generally believes that Iraq's instability is because we withdrew our forces, not because we invaded and armed the militants.

7:47 PM PT: ISIS is reported to be using chemical weapons
ISIS also has captured 88 pounds of uranium
And then there is the $2 Billion  in weapons that the fleeing Iraqi army left behind

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site