Skip to main content

House Speaker John Boehner press conference on Thursday, June 12, 2014
He sure does.
The apparent collapse of the veteran's aid in conference committee seems to underline just how uninterested the House continues to be in actually governing. We've got Rep. Jeff Miller managing reconciliation from the House side, and he's let his Senate counterpart, Sen. Bernie Sanders, know that the House will be dictating the reconciliation terms.
The most peeved, however, was Sanders. He hastily organized a press conference with fellow Senate Democrats in which he rapped Miller for demanding a vote on a proposal that, according to an aide, did not adhere to the outlines of earlier discussions.

“You cannot talk about negotiating, you cannot talk about a conference committee, when somebody is asking you to join you ... for a formal vote on ‘this’ proposal,” said Sanders.

Well no, having an unofficial "conference committee" meeting consisting entirely of House members and then telling the Senate that their new plan is what you'll be having a vote on is not quite how the process usually goes, but it certainly underscores the House's insistence that it's either their way or the (badly underfunded) highway.

For their part, the House seems conspicuously unconcerned. Follow me below the fold for more.

Recall that efforts to reform the Veterans Administration have been declared to be of utmost importance—a month ago, the department was reeling from scandal and politicians of both houses and parties were demanding heads. But that was then, and now the dire need that was obvious then has already run up against the inability of the House to feign interest even when faced with dire needs. Where's House Speaker John Boehner in all this? Being John Boehner:

Asked about the bill at a press conference yesterday, Boehner told reporters, “We’ve got a systemic failure of an entire department  of our government. And I think understanding just how sick this patient is is critically important, before we start doing what Washington usually does, and that’s just throw money at the problem, throw money at the problem.”

This suggests the Speaker doesn’t understand the basics of the debate. The bipartisan veterans-aid package doesn’t “just throw money at the problem.” It expands VA health care access, tuition assistance, and job training to veterans – just as the House bill does.

The reason the bill is dying has nothing to do with understanding “just how sick” the VA is and everything to do with a disagreement about finances. The fact that Boehner doesn’t know this suggests the veterans-aid bill just isn’t a high priority for him.

You could copy and paste much of that paragraph into almost any other debate in Congress right now and it'd be just as accurate. There's a need; the need is critical; the need requires the House to do something; the House makes a big noise about doing something only to scuttle it after an initial publicity binge as their members revolt against voting to spend actual money on the effort; John Boehner gets up and defends the botched effort under a new theory that the critical national need does not need money, it just needs a stern talking to.

Think back just a month ago; the VA was in scandal, the way our veterans were being treated upon coming home from the wars the Congress clamored for was widely considered a disgrace, and all of Washington was aflutter with the demands that something be done. It was enough to do the impossible—speedily pass a bill in both houses to fund repairs and reforms.

And now? Meh. If the House can't do it their way, it's not worth doing.

Originally posted to Hunter on Fri Jul 25, 2014 at 10:05 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site