Skip to main content

In San Francisco, the value of greenery means two different things to two different types of people. John McLaren, the superintendent of Golden Gate Park for over 50 years until his death in 1943, devoted his life to the green only found in a natural habitat. Current forces within City Hall and the Department of Recreation & Parks seem devoted to the green generated from the systematic betrayal McLaren’s promise. And if this is a world-class town, saving our world-class park may need some world-class attention.

This November, San Franciscans will be voting on two ballot measures that may seem similar at first glance but in fact represent this green dichotomy.

The first one mandates that any renovations to the western edge of Golden Gate Park at the Beach Chalet Soccer Fields (an area of town that I have called home for over 10 years) protect the overall habitat, be done with natural grass, and forbid the use of 150,000 watts of stadium lighting that would remain on until 10pm 365 days a year.

Two neighborhood groups named SF Ocean Edge and The Coalition to Protect Golden Gate Park have been fighting a bloated and dangerous proposal to install the aforementioned stadium lights and seven acres of crumbified recycled tires (and all of the juicy little chemicals that lie within them) into the Park for years. The proponents of this project, led by the Rec. & Park Department, refuse to invest in any organic compromise, but nonetheless, won every bureaucratic hurdle, including a flawed Environmental Impact Report, a vote at the Board of Supervisors, and a thumbs up from the California Coastal Commission.

This proposal will forever destroy the entire premise of the Golden Gate Park and would likely be washed away by rising sea levels anyway, if you think about it. (The beach isn’t far from here at all.)

Once the pro-side knew our highly grassroots signature-gathering efforts to undo this project would succeed (it qualified on July 22), they countered with their own ballot measure to ensure the construction of these toxic fields, increasing the threat of even more park commercialization and less community oversight.

It was placed on the upcoming ballot by five supervisors, with full support from Mayor Ed Lee: David Chiu (a candidate for State Assembly), Mark Farrell (who represents the conservative Marina District), Eric Mar (a supervisor for the Richmond District, which neighbors the Park), Katy Tang (my representative here in the Sunset), and Scott Wiener (from the Castro, whom I nickname The Victorian Homosexual, but I will explain that another time).

The dual campaigns over the fate of Golden Gate Park have barely begun, but it will settle this question once and for all: Is environmentalism no longer a core San Francisco value but only a peripheral one at best?

To say that Rec & Park simply wants to astroturf the western end of the Park is something of a misnomer. Their actual plan is to mow down dozens of trees and other “useless” wildlife and cover the area with recycled crumb rubber provided through the Tire Incentive Program. Once the program started to roll out grants during the fiscal year 2005-2006, crumb rubber fields began popping up throughout the City. Green is alluring, but chemicals like arsenic, benzene, lead, and mercury that have been found in crumb fields like these are not.

Expect to hear What about the children? bantered around quite a bit throughout this campaign. Nevertheless, it is clear that this massive project is designed to generate big sponsorships and big dollars from big boys and girls employed by major soccer organizations throughout the country – perhaps even the world.

The main thesis of the argument will go something like this: Families are under attack in San Francisco. My children have nowhere to play, and this project is the only way to clean up the fields. Quit being a selfish NIMBY. Let’s get in on this World Cup action.

Huge development money will come pouring in to buy off endorsements, politicians, and their ambitious sycophants. Side-deals will be made for other controversial development projects; jobs will be promised; and slick mailers and out-of-state robocalls will be financed. And from this astroturf campaign will grow some organic moss, I am sure.

However, as everyday San Franciscans realize what the Rec & Park Dept. and City Hall want to do, we see a gut-level sense of disbelief and an Are you kidding me? look across various faces. This, not money, fueled our ability to turn this project into a ballot referendum, perhaps bringing Golden Gate Park back to what John McLaren intended it be, and remain, all those years ago.

Last year, San Francisco had a similarly confusing fight on Fisherman’s Wharf over whether or not to build wildly expensive and massive luxury housing called 8 Washington. This fight involved signature gathering, City Hall insiders obsessed with “development”, and charges of NIMBYism.

The 8 Washington deal was defeated overwhelmingly at the polls, but the fight to protect the westside of Golden Gate Park has its own unique challenges. Our coalition of progressives, environmentalists, and City Hall skeptics are going to need nationwide organizations like The Sierra Club to roll deep to get this campaign off the ground. Folks like myself will need to swing endorsements and liaison with campaign consultants, all the while beating back charges that we are just disgruntled NIMBYs, assuming you can even be a NIMBY if you’re only a renter of very modest means.

I have crossed the Beach Chalet Soccer Fields hundreds of times, quietly listening to bands like Broadcast and Stereolab, watching kids play ball with birds nearby, desperately worrying about money. For me, the lack of one type of greenery is made up for, in part, by a plentiful supply of the other. Try not to judge me too much: my first word was tree. This sort of thing is second nature.


Do you support keeping only natural grass in the western end of Golden Gate Park and a ban on stadium lighting?

86%106 votes
12%15 votes
0%1 votes

| 122 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  You doomed yourselves when you let them steal (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Victor Ward, unfangus

    the Presidio from you. You live in a billionaires playground and they will do what they will with it and with you.

    "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

    by Greyhound on Fri Jul 25, 2014 at 01:42:14 PM PDT

  •  I moved to Oakland (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    unfangus, GTK, Creosote

    during the first tech wave because San Fransisco has become a bastion of everything that's wrong with capitalism. Wish you luck on keeping GG Park environmentally friendly but when I venture back across the bridge I see gentrification and the cost of living due to tech company invasion as the number one problem and it has spread over this way for some time now. Fighting for living wages, to fend off skyrocketing food, housing and transportation costs here in Oakland/San Fransisco takes up the majority of my efforts. What can a non San Fransisco resident do on this specific issue?

    •  Donate... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Jonathon Davis, Creosote

      to the Coalition to Protect Golden Gate Park, if you have the means. (The link is provided above.)

      The Outer Sunset is one of the last affordable places to live in San Francisco, and Golden Gate Park one of the last places you can go without spending money. There are cool events out here, though: Bay 2 Breakers ends here, and we have Outsidelands. But this project is a whole different beast entirely.

      Lord knows I will be terrified if Google Buses start clamoring up and down the avenues. I hope it isn't just a matter of time.

      •  I lived in the (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        GTK, Creosote

        Richmond for a few years after being pushed out of the Mission. 21st and Cabrillo right off Fulton. And yes, the techies will gentrify the entire city sooner rather than later. It has begun in Oakland as well. I bought a 550 sq ft condo via the Freddie Mac "first look initiative" (for 80k) so I lucked out. Thank god for that. All is not well in the Bay Area. We have much work to do and many of us are overwhelmed. Financially and "spiritually". Keeping our public space itself is under attack, it's hard maintaining funding for public space let alone keeping it green. I'm with ya though. I'll post this info along.

        ps. who's specifically supporting this within the community other than the supervisors? Did people within the community actually push to make this happen or is it a top down project?  

        •  Top Down... (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          From what I understand, City Fields (supported by the Donald Fisher heirs) are in the public/private partnership with the Department of Rec. and Park --- and its goal is to renovate the parks with these materials. There are some big bucks backing this proposal.

  •  Watch the video about this project and learn more! (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Creosote, catilinus, GTK

    Please go to Youtube and watch this video, to learn more about the damage that this project will do to Golden Gate Park.

    Beach Chalet fields renovation Youtube


    Also, you can learn more about the project and alternatives by going to the SF Ocean Edge website --

    Thank you!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site