In a story about eGhazi, the NYT publishes this:
the president himself and Mrs. Clinton’s successor, Secretary of State John Kerry, both use private accounts in addition to their government email addresses.
Is this a problem? The story states that the concern in eGhazi is:
control over what emails to release and when
Doesn't maintaining a private e-mail raise the same concern? Indeed, in a more pointed way? Now the response will no doubt be "not if the personal e-mail is not used for official government business." But that begs the question - who decides what's "official government business" and who has "control over what e-mails to release and when?"
My point is the control of e-mail release happens both when the transmission occurs (when choosing to use either govt e-mail or private e-mail) or when deciding which e-mails pertain to government business after the fact.
A scheme to conceal e-mails would be better if you maintain both private and government e-mails than going all private e-mail. Which, if you think Clinton went all private e-mail to control and conceal e-mails, makes the alleged Clinton scheme pretty moronic.
As Supervilllains go, Hillary seems a piker to me.