Within days of each other last summer, Benjamin Netanyahu and Hillary Clinton announced to the world that they both had decided that they effectively oppose a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. Those statements weren't put together at the time.
Last August, HRC used exactly the same words as Netanyahu to justify his no two-state stand. She went on to say that Bibi is in "good conscience" for refusal to allow the Palestinians to control security on the West Bank.
Netanyahu:
“There cannot be a situation, under any agreement, in which we relinquish security control of the territory west of the Jordan River.”
- Benjamin Netanyahu, Press Conference, July 11, 2014, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
HRC: “If I were the prime minister of Israel, you’re damn right I would expect to have control over security,” Clinton said of the West Bank, citing the need to “protect Israel from the influx of Hamas or cross-border attacks from anywhere else.” - Interview with Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic, Aug 10 2014,
http://www.theatlantic.com/...
Full excerpt from The Atlantic interview, below:
Clinton also seemed to take an indirect shot at administration critics of Netanyahu, who has argued that the rise of Muslim fundamentalism in the Middle East means that Israel cannot, in the foreseeable future, withdraw its forces from much of the West Bank. “If I were the prime minister of Israel, you’re damn right I would expect to have control over security, because even if I’m dealing with Abbas, who is 79 years old, and other members of Fatah, who are enjoying a better lifestyle and making money on all kinds of things, that does not protect Israel from the influx of Hamas or cross-border attacks from anywhere else. With Syria and Iraq, it is all one big threat. So Netanyahu could not do this in good conscience.”
Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic candidate, is running against President Obama on this issue. She is instead in lockstep with the Prime Minister of Israel.