The following is a copy of an e-mail I sent to Stu Rothenberg, editor of the Rothenberg Political Report in response to his disastrous analysis of the CT-SEN primary, which you can find
here:
Mr. Rothenberg,
I find it extremely offensive that you call Ned Lamont supporters in your recent review ("What happens after Lieberman loses?") of the CT-SEN primary "crazies" and "bomb-throwers." Simply because Americans support a particular candidate does not make them crazy and by making this claim, you are furthering the "partisanship and bitterness" that you so readily disdain. Maybe it is because when Republicans throw bombs or talk crazy, as most do, it does not bother you. But how dare a Democrat be tough and stand up to Republicans on a foolish, and ill-conceived strategic blunder that is Iraq. Maybe you can actually try to be an objective analyst and objectively analyze this race, without injecting your bombastic rhetoric that demonizes and villainizes voters. I think you owe them an apology, publicly. And if you dismiss this letter as some sort of extremist rhetoric, I dare say that you are just as closed-minded and unfair as those you try to admonish.
Someone should tell Rothenberg that he is a hack, and has no place in objective analysis.