[From the Frog Pond]

Hey, Happy Independence Day everybody.  Do you know what is patriotic?  Sticking up for the Constitution of the United States of America is patriotic.  So, let's review a little history, shall we?  Let me cut and paste a little snippet from the SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES, better known as the Church Committee:

Want some knowledge?

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." - Sir Winston Churchill

You can quibble about the definition of 'democracy' but the key is the vote.  Without the vote you have guaranteed tyranny.  You can expand the franchise or contract the franchise and your results may vary, but the government must absolutely be accountable to the people.  

"If you don't vote, you've got no right to complain." - Anonymous

Sometimes I am a little harsh with Dennis Kucinich but there's a reason that goes far beyond anything having to do with Dennis.  Progressives have been down for so long, and have been so marginalized in our political culture, that we have no sophistication, we have no experience in governing, and we have almost no bench to staff Barack Obama's administration.  It's almost amusing to watch my progressive brothers and sisters wring their hands everytime Obama's campaign floats the name of a possible member of his cabinet.  It almost inevitably results in accusations that Obama isn't remotely progressive or dislikes progressives or is selling out progressives.  Well...let me ask you.  Who have we allowed to become the face of progressivism?  Dennis Kucinich.  Kucinich has a few wacky positions but he's the one out there talking about single-payer health care, impeachment, and most forcefully advocating an end to the war.  He's a flawed messenger in the exact same way that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have been flawed messengers for the black community.  You may want to defend them because they've at least been talking the talk, but it's never good to have your interests represented by people that are easily marginalized.  Never.

[From the Frog Pond]

If you have ever watched World Cup soccer (better known as football) you've seen the following.  When a player is injured and unable to run up and down the field, the other team will not press their advantage but will kick the ball out of bounds, granting an opportunity for the injured player to be tended to and replaced.  It's called sportsmanship.  In American sports you will occasionally see the same thing happen in basketball and even ice hockey.  

[From the Frog Pond]

I kind of half-watched Charlie Rose's interview last night with Antonin Scalia.  Basically, Scalia explained his way of interpreting the Constitution, which he calls 'Originalism'.  Broken down to brass tacks, Originalism is an effort to interpret what the Constitution meant to the people that wrote it when they wrote it.  I obviously think this is a moronically self-restricting way to interpret the Constitution but it has one merit.  It pays a lot of attention to what the Founding Fathers had to say about things.  And, if there is one really serious shortcoming of the Democratic Party, it is its failure to utilize the wisdom of the Founding Fathers when it goes about justifying its policies.  

[From the Frog Pond]

There's no question that Barack Obama has been riding the wave of a generational zeitgeist, having captured in an elegant form the feelings of disgust and longing and sudden hardship of the younger half of America.  There is no question about that.  But even though that's been the case until now...now, Barack Obama has cracked up on the shoals and rang out a tremendously discordant note.  

[From the Frog Pond]

A strange thing is happening in the South.  When Don Cazayoux and Travis Childers won their special elections in, respectively, Louisiana and Mississippi, the Republicans complained that they they ran as Republicans.  This wasn't strictly true.  They ran as pro-life, anti-gay marriage, anti-immigration candidates.  That made them seem like Republicans.  But they also ran against the war and they ran against corporate welfare, and they ran against free trade agreements.  They ran on increasing federal funding on infrastructure and education, and they ran on nixing No Child Left Behind.  On many issues they were fully in line with the Democratic Party, and on some they were more in line with the Progressives than the Blue Dogs.  

Out of the 81 representatives and 29 senators of the Democratic Party that voted to authorize military force against Iraq, only two can truly be said to have prospered.  Rep. Rod Blagojevich was elected as Governor of Illinois and Sen. Harry Reid was promoted to Majority Leader.  Some other members have since acquired chairmanships or (in Chuck Schumer and Steny Hoyer's cases) leadership positions, but no other pro-war voters have advanced to higher office.  In fact, they have all (save Blagojevich) lost in every single attempt to advance their careers.  Here is the sad state of the pro-war caucus in the House:

[From the Frog Pond]

E.J. Dionne, one of my favorite bigfoot columnists, does another of these columns about the disappointment many women feel about how the Democratic primary turned out.  Dionne focuses on female politicians, especially those that were the first to hold certain offices.  And there are two main complaints he elicits.  The first is that Barack Obama never would have been able to win this nomination with his thin resume if he were a woman.  And the second is anger with how the media (particularly men in the media) has treated Clinton throughout this campaign.  And, to be honest, I basically agree with their gripes.  I can quibble a bit on both scores, but I basically agree.

[From the Frog Pond]

It's somewhat sad to see what is happening to Scottie McClellan.  Even when he was spinning like an Iranian uranium-enrichment centrifuge, I always felt a strange kind of sympathy for Scottie.  Now I know why.  I recognized a sliver of humanity in him that is lacking in all other Bushite sycophants.  McClellan has come (oh, I don't know...) 60% clean in his new tell-part book and the White House and their apologists are calling him 'Benedict Arnold', 'a traitor', 'a turncoat', a 'Hamas apologist' (???), and "probably the worst White House press secretary in recent memory."

I want to tackle this RFK thing from a slightly different angle.  Let's for the moment put aside all talk of assassination and look at this from the perspective of what she was asked.  She was asked why people are asking her to drop out.  We need to remind ourselves that she was attempting to answer that question.  It's a question that asks her to step into a non-supporter's shoes and look at things from their perspective for a moment.  Now, her answer to this question was that she didn't know why people were asking her to drop out and that she found it somewhat mystifying given the history of long primaries in the past.  She chose two poor examples to make her point, as the 1968 contest started and ended later than this one, and her husband's 1992 campaign was effectively (if not mathematically) over in March.  But it's not so important that her examples were bad...what's important is that she seems not to understand why she is being asked to drop out.  So, I'll explain it for her...real slow.

[From the Frog Pond]

For three years I have dedicated my life to combating 'the stupid', by which I mean, for example, the asinine pronouncements of people like Clifford May, who famously declared that everyone in Washington DC knew that Valerie Wilson was employed by the CIA.  This stuff isn't really 'stupid', it's deadly serious and it is perpetrated by people that know full well that what they are saying is not true.

[From the Frog Pond]

It's fairly rare for Americans to be united behind any particular president.  Is some sense we have never been truly united politically.  We certainly were not united under Abraham Lincoln.  But there have been times when the nation was relatively united.  The country was fairly united behind Franklin Roosevelt even before Pearl Harbor, although there were great internal debates.  The country was certainly united as never before or since after Pearl Harbor.  

[From the Frog Pond]

I've noticed this new common acronym that keeps getting repeated on Hillblogs: WWTSBJQ.  Presumably, this stands for 'Why Won't the Stupid B*tch Just Quit'.  Today, it's in use to suggest that John Edwards is part of a network of 'boiz' that are conspiring to push Clinton out of the race before all the people get to vote.  I guess I'm part of that network, and so is Markos and John Aravosis, and a bunch of other male pro-Obama bloggers.  

[From the Frog Pond]

There is an article in this morning's Washington Post about some of the racial resistance volunteers for Barack Obama have encountered on the campaign trail. It depressing, and somewhat misleading, as out in the field racist responses are few and far in between.  But they do happen, and they happen more often in some regions than in others.  A big part of the Post article focuses on Kokomo, Indiana, and it's no big surprise that there is lingering racism there.

As Obama surveys the Electoral College map, he needs to take several things into consideration.  First, he needs to look at defending the Kerry states.  That means he must make sure he is running strong in the Mid-Atlantic states of Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, where John McCain is actually quite popular and familiar, due to his constant media presence on shows like Imus in the Morning over the last fifteen years.  He also needs to check his strength in New Hampshire (where McCain has twice won important primaries) and Maine.  Obama also needs to shore up his position in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Oregon.  If he feels like he is holding the line in all these Kerry states, then he is free to go on offense.

Dear Jeralyn, Armando (Big Tent Democrat), Jerome Armstrong, Taylor Marsh, etc.:

I'm confused about something.  You all keep saying that it is vitally important that we count every vote before determining who the nominee should be.  It's a fine principle, and one that is familiar to all Democrats from the last two presidential elections.  So, if we agree to count all the votes from Michigan and Florida and to seat all the delegates based on those votes, and Hillary Clinton is still behind in the pledged delegates (as she would inevitably be), it is my understanding that you then expect the superdelegates to vote overwhelmingly in the opposite direction, thereby not only countering, but reversing the will of the voters.  

[From the Frog Pond]

Just so you know, there are 217 pledged delegates left to win in the Democratic nominating process. Let me use the somewhat imprecise Slate Delegate Calculator to give you and idea of how those delegates might break.  Clinton has a 55-27 edge in Pollster.com's poll of polls for West Virginia.  Let's round that up to a nice 64-36 outcome: Clinton 18-10, +8 pledged delegates.  Clinton has a 62-28 advantage in Kentucky.  Let's round that up to a 67-33 outcome: Clinton 34-17, +17 Delegates.  Recent polls in Oregon give Obama a lead of about 51-42.  Let's round that up to a 55-45 outcome: Obama 29-23, Obama +6.