I am tired of all this crap in the last 14 days

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Wednesday February 04, 2009 · 8:00 PM PST

2009/02/04 · 20:00

I am so tired of this crap already, I thought we won the election in November? I think bipartisanship is overrated, bipartisanship. Always hurt the Democrats more than it does the Republicans.

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday October 24, 2008 · 1:37 PM PDT

2008/10/24 · 13:37

I keep hearing about internal polls, and so I wanted to know if it is better than public polls?

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Friday August 01, 2008 · 5:18 PM PDT

2008/08/01 · 17:18

I wonder if Obama is making a mistake by not linking John McCain to George W. Bush this early on, I know it is only Aug 1. John McCain has been trying to define Obama already, as we know it takes a while to define someone. obama need to say everyday how John McCain is like George W. Bush in both his TV AD and speech’s

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Monday January 15, 2007 · 11:38 AM PST

2007/01/15 · 11:38

The Iraq War was a colossal mistake from the beginning. It was based on ideological views and a very small and narrow view of the world, and it has made us less safe and disillusionment is now the American mindset of a hammer and nail.

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Saturday September 03, 2005 · 12:53 PM PDT

2005/09/03 · 12:53

I know this a shot diaries but I am getter angry at the media and people on this site for call the people LA refugees These people who are with out home and who has lost everything are American citizens and they pay tax,it seem like we have forgotten what it mean to an amerian, this is not the america i came to 17 year ago so can we stop call them refugee, it is not like they coming on a raft from Cuba or Latin America

you sould read this

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday March 13, 2005 · 12:01 AM PST

2005/03/13 · 00:01

i do not belivie it, but read below Read More

kerry and gore at ths time four year ago

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Monday October 25, 2004 · 2:24 PM PDT

2004/10/25 · 14:24

is john kerry doing better than al gore was doing at this time four year ago or not, i can not find one national poll that has kerry up. what was poll like abc/waspost , cnn,gallup/usatoday, zroby were stay for gore and bush, at this date four ago. i do not that the winner on nov 2 will win the poplar vote.
what is the deal nh is it kerry or not

go red sox

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday October 17, 2004 · 9:27 PM PDT

2004/10/17 · 21:27

go boston, i feel like the red sox and john kerry are alike in that boston never do well in post-season, and kerry bering from the north and the last democrat to win the white house from north was jfk 0-4

has kerry ever lead in the washpost/abc news poll

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday October 17, 2004 · 4:32 PM PDT

2004/10/17 · 16:32

if so, when

how did al gore win the poplear vote. when he was way behind in poll.

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Tuesday September 21, 2004 · 8:01 PM PDT

2004/09/21 · 20:01

kerry has a lot of time lefth to win
look at this link people.

http://dir.salon.com/politics/trail/2000/10/26/trail_mix/index.html

THIS IS A GOOD ONE

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Wednesday March 24, 2004 · 9:31 AM PST

2004/03/24 · 09:31

Mr Bush's record as a war leader is looking increasingly tarnished 24 March 2004 President Bush's strongest suit in his re-election campaign was supposed to be his war record. This was not the stint he served in the Texas Air National Guard while his contemporaries fought in Vietnam, but his record as the US commander in chief in the days, months and years after the terrorist strikes of 11 September, 2001, to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. Mr Bush's jet-propelled arrival on the deck of the USS Lincoln to pronounce the end of the war was the image meant to define his victorious progress to re-election. This plan is coming unstuck before our very eyes. The first breach was opened by the energetic Democratic primary campaign of Howard Dean, who dared question the wisdom and conduct of the Iraq war. He spoke to a constituency that had kept quiet until then for fear of being stigmatised as un-American. Into this more questioning climate have come a string of insider claims about the genesis and conduct of the Iraq war, each more damaging than the last to Mr Bush's prowess as war leader. The latest, and most destructive, of these claims have been made by as well-qualified an accuser as one could find: the former White House terrorism co-ordinator, Richard Clarke. Central to his allegations is the charge that President Bush and those close to him had a fixation with Iraq from the day they took office, and did their utmost to find evidence that Baghdad had a hand in the 11 September atrocities, although none was found. In interviews, Mr Clarke said this preoccupation with Iraq led the administration to ignore the real threat from al-Qa'ida, which had already been blamed for the US embassy bombings in Africa and the attack on USS Cole. In passing, Mr Clarke suggested that the Bush Administration, starting with the President, had been less assiduous in pursuing demonstrated terrorist threats than had President Clinton. He depicted an administration that manifested a deadly combination of misplaced ideological zeal and managerial drift. Mr Clarke's accusations were all the more damaging because his is not an isolated voice. His observations chime with those of others who have experience of working with Mr Bush. David Frum, a former White House speech-writer wrote about the President's limited attention span. Paul O'Neill, the former Treasury Secretary, spoke of Mr Bush's semi-detached management style and his personal determination to effect "regime-change" in Iraq. The UN's chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix, and David Kay, the US expert who led the futile US search for Iraq's weapons after the war, both remarked on the administration's longing to link Iraq to 11 September. In other words, while Mr Clarke may have mis-remembered individual details and have certain private axes to grind, his allegations ring true. The fierceness of the White House response only underlines their potential to damage the self-styled "war President". Not only have White House officials followed the Clinton campaign strategy of knocking every new allegation smartly on the head. They have taken the additional precaution of questioning Mr Clarke's motives, alluding to possible personal disappointments and slights. But Mr Clarke is no neophyte; he has service to four presidents behind him. He will know how to defend himself and has the chance to do so today when he testifies to the commission that is investigating the attacks of 11 September. He will also know that none of the evidence given yesterday to the same panel, either by the former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, or by the present incumbent, Colin Powell, seriously discredited anything he has said. It is too early in the presidential campaign to forecast whether Mr Bush can rescue his carefully cultivated image as war leader in an America still suffering the aftershocks of 11 September. For those of us long sceptical of Mr Bush's leadership qualities, however, everything we are now learning about his approach to war - whether the war in Iraq or the "war on terror" - only strengthens our fears.

why do the main media like cnn,msnbc,cnbc,abc, what kerry to lose

davidjoe10

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Wednesday March 17, 2004 · 4:24 AM PST

2004/03/17 · 04:24

it seem like when i ever turn on the tv it alway pro-bush and ant-kerry even on msnbc.

Newer
Older

RSS

I am tired of all this crap in the last 14 days

what is more reliable internal polls or public polls?

big pic

war in iraq

stop calling them refugees

you sould read this

kerry and gore at ths time four year ago

go red sox

has kerry ever lead in the washpost/abc news poll

how did al gore win the poplear vote. when he was way behind in poll.

THIS IS A GOOD ONE

why do the main media like cnn,msnbc,cnbc,abc, what kerry to lose