I've uploaded election data for NJ and TN and (finally) corrected NM data for Los Alamos.
The TN presidential vote counts are about half of what they should be, I think due to early and absentees (although the notes from the team was not specific on this). The overall percentage is about right. In any case, the average is there as well and should provide a useful guideline. Average includes presidential, governor, senate and house races from 2004-2008.
The NJ vote counts are just a little low. Some vote districts changed between 2008 and 2010 and the team had to distribute vote counts across some vote districts. The average includes presidential, governor and senate races from 2002-2009.
For NM I updated the Los Alamos precincts based on roguemapper's numbers from comments in a diary from June 7th.
The Prof team released data for MA, CT and NH as well. However, MA and CT do not have vote counts; only registraion percentages, so I am not going to use them. For NH there are vote counts for vote districts, but I know that vote districts are less useful than block groups for NH. So, let me know if any of you want to use NH vote distrct data.
Enjoy.
Dave's Redistricting is a project of ProgressiveCongress.org. Please consider supporting the project with a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you.