What's with the SCLM? They seem to get right to the edge of breaking a story and then they let it go. They were on again and off again with Bush's Guard record. They still can't seem to really come down on Bush on any of his deceptions. It was Carville, I think who said "We say 1+1 =3 and they say 1+1=3,000 and the media says 'Opinions vary on the new math.'"
Here's a link to a piece commenting on a respected JPL scientist who did photo enhancement analysis of the "bulge" on Bush's back during the first debate. http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2012 As you can see the New York Times was given the story. Apparently, the Times even wrote a piece on the issue, but they wouldn't publish it. Great, with liberal media like that who needs Fox?
As Cosette elsewhere said in this regard:
"there are countless instances of this occurring. with their omission or marginalizing of newsworthy stories the msm wields as much power as they can through publication. [....] we must continue to out the post, times and networks on this practice. "