The notion of popular amendment comes from the conceptual framework of the Constitution. Its power derives from the people; it was adopted by the people; it functions at the behest of and for the benefit of the people. Given all this, if the people, as a whole, somehow demanded a change to the Constitution, should not the people be allowed to make such a change? ... the people may change the constitutions whenever and however they please. This is a right of which no positive institution can ever deprive them." James Wilson, 1787
Update
I should add that I selected the process of amendment as a means to start real dialogue; and because it does bypass the whole attainder issue, though one poster seemed to obsess on that aspect without seeing the subtlety of changing the Constitution to allow for an alternate means of removal of the President and to compell Congress to investigate. Bill Clinton was investigated, castigated and Attainted far in excess of the law without amendment. Anyway, the great part of the Kos community is the ability to throw out ideas, vent, and work for positive change.
Thanks!
Read More