It's been a while since I posted a diary of substance...but I figured "Why start now?"
I just had the following conversation with my friend, an avid Bush/Republican apologist (even though he considers himself a Conservative Libertarian), and I felt I needed to share. (His IM screen name changed to protect him from some of yous guys ;) ...and I changed my IM screen name, too because I was using my work screen name, so please don't try to IM 'spyral' because you won't get me.) Now, I'm not the best debater (I was stoned through most of my high school debabe class), but I think I got him on a few points, and what does he do? Answer them w/facts? No, no...he just ends the conversation. I kinda want to bang my head against the wall now...Why does that feel normal after talking w/a Republican?
Anyway, the point of sharing all this is to illustrate what I believe the problem with the way conservatives argue:
*They throw around allegations that were proven to be false.
*Add a little comment that adds nothing to the dialogue or has nothing to do w/the main topic.
*Leave when things aren't going their way.
Has anyone else had this experience?
Without further ado, here's our conversation...in all it's glory! (Seriously, my apologies for the grammar/spelling/etc. mistakes.) Oh, and take the poll...
Read More