If you accepted and or defended the political decisions and actions of this gutless leader and his majority party during this recent period when they controlled all three ELECTED branches of government, with large majorities in the two legislative branches, you shouldn't be too disappointed with what happens starting next month.
Some of us walked away when Obama gamed us with his 180 on the telecom amnesty vote months before the election. With this reaction, we became "the problem", the leader of change could do nothing wrong.
The latest election season came. We still saw no reason to vote for the man or for his party. Serial cave in number umpteen is now coming down the tracks.
The wealthiest two percent will receive their tax cut, ably represented by their party which currently controls no branch of government, the best and most effective representation money can buy. As of July, 2009, the bottom 80 percent owned just 12.3 percent of the wealth. Obama and democrats have done nothing politically to change that trend toward nothingness. Until they do, I see only a one party system, with only the political influence money can buy, demonstrably walking the walk. Still nothing to support about either party.
When 280 million only still own 12.3 percent of the pie, and falling,`
you cannot say you are helping them if you vote for anyone or anything that will cause the net effect of the further reduction of their holdings by even another dime.
http://www.levyinstitute.org/...
(bottom of page 32)
"..it is possible to provide a partial update of the wealth figures to July 1, 2009 based on two notable developments....
...Trends in inequality are also interesting.... The share of the top 1 percent advanced from 34.6 to 37.1 percent, that of the top 5 percent from 61.8 to 65 percent, and that of the top quintile from 85 to 87.7 percent, while that of the second quintile fell from 10.9 to 10 percent, that of the middle quintile from 4 to 3.1 percent, and that of the bottom two quintiles from 0.2 to -0.8 percent. ..the share of households with zero or negative net worth, from 18.6 to 24.1 percent."
http://www.federalreserve.gov/...
Currents and Undercurrents: Changes in the Distribution of Wealth, 1989–2004 (a new triennial, SCF, Fed Reserve "Study of Conusmer Finances...will be released shortly after the election...sure to document, even further wealth concentration into the hands of the top ten percent.)
January 30, 2006
Abstract
This paper considers changes in the distribution of the wealth of U.S. families over the 1989–2004 period using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF)...
page 27
...Ownership shares. For some assets, the distributions of the amounts held are far more disproportionate than the differences in ownership rates. MOST STRIKING is the 62.3 percent share of business assets OWNED BY THE WEALTHIEST 1 percent of the wealth distribution in 2004 (table 11a); the NEXT-WEALTHIEST 4 percent OWNED ANOTHER 22.4 percent of the total. Other key items subject to capital gains also show strong disproportions: THE WEALTHIEST 5 PERCENT OF FAMILIES OWNED 61.9 percent of residential real estate other than principal residences, 71.7 percent of nonresidential real estate, and 65.9 PERCENT OF DIRECTLY- AND INDIRECTLY HELD STOCKS. For bonds, 93.7 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL WERE HELD BY THIS GROUP...."