Skip to main content

As predicted, the calls for the Left to acknowledge the success of the surge are increasing.  It was surprising to absolutely no one that throwing 30,000 more police officers into an area would result in lower crime rates, but that was not the purpose of the surge.  There are faint glimmers of political reconciliation in Iraq however.  Enough for the Right to finally declare that we're winning in Iraq, and demand the Left do the same.

The problem is that the Right has been declaring victory in Iraq non-stop for four years straight.  Widespread looting, the insurgency, all meant we were winning.  We were winning without the surge; we were winning with the surge.  Both the rise and fall of attacks on U.S. troops and Iraqi citizens meant we were somehow winning.  Bottom line:  the Right's record on defining 'victory' is horrible.  Why should we believe them now?

If the Right had treated Iraq as anything other than a political football the past four years they might have earned themselves a little more sympathy.  Instead of acknowledging any problems with Iraq they circled wagons and attacked Democrats as traitorous, treasonous supporters of terrorists.  In the mean time Iraq never got fixed.  We must remember that it wasn't until Iraq started hurting republicans politically that they decided to adjust their strategy.  By then it was too late though; their own base was complaining as well, and you don't get elected by calling your base traitors.

There was a moment when they could have headed the situation off by dealing with the problems in Iraq before conservatives started complaining, before the 2006 elections, before they had the gall to try and send Tony Snow out in front of the cameras and say "we've never been for staying the course" in Iraq.  There was a moment when the President could have addressed the nation, acknowledged errors, and asked the American people for their support in this continuing endeavor.  Instead, Bush spent 2006 going to republican rallies across the country saying vote for Democrats and the terrorists win.

In demanding the Left acknowledge the good news out of Iraq the right is looking for a soundbite and nothing more.  One aspect of Iraq has gone from awful to less awful; conservatives insist that fixing 10% of the problems is the equivalent of a 100% success in Iraq.  If those are the only two options the right is able or willing consider then Democrats are never going to give them their precious soundbites.  Iraq is politics to them, from beginning to end.  They have yet to show any compassion for the Iraqi people or the soldiers.  

If they truly think we're winning in Iraq then let them run on it in November.  Let the voters decide.  Until then their pathetic calls to remove politics from the Iraqi equation will fall on deaf ears.  They wanted to use Iraq as a political issue and they're going to continue to do so, whether they want to or not.

Originally posted to james richardson on Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 09:30 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site