(Preface: I am an Edwards supporter who voted for Obama after Edwards dropped out. As you can see from my DKos page and comments page I've stayed out of the online Clinton-Obama wars. I'm not 'trolling' over here to stir the pot.)
As an a Obama supporter I just have to make this clear to Clinton supporters and the Democratic party: If a disputed Michigan delegation provides the margin for a Clinton nomination, that is simply a bridge too far for me. An election with only one name on the ballot is no way to choose an nominee, let alone be the determinative difference.
As I see stories of how supposedly Michigan is becoming Clinton's secret weapon, with Clinton trying to get some of the uncommitted delegates in addition to her tainted, one candidate election, pledged delegates, I say this in candor and sincerity to my Clinton supporting friends -- Be very careful, because you're playing with fire. Michigan cannot provide the decisive delegate votes.
Speaking for myself (and, I suspect, a lot of Obama supporters), I simply cannot see my way past the anger and outrage that would result from that outcome. I cannot see Obama endorsing the nominee; I cannot see the party holding together.
Clinton better think long and hard before going down that destructive path. Michigan is a nuclear option.
Agree, disagree, flame away -- I don't care, I just needed to say my piece and go on record...
(...Adding, to be clear, I want our Michigan party leaders, activists and friends included in the convention. They just can't be the deciding group in the nomination balloting.)