Skip to main content

It's becoming a term of common usage.  And not a term of endearment mind you ...

Democrat Party (phrase)

Following his inauguration in 2001, President George W. Bush often used the noun-as-adjective when referring to the opposition party.[19]  Likewise, it has been used by former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay,[20]  House Minority Leader John Boehner,[21]  Senator Charles Grassley,[22]  Congressman Steve Buyer,[23]  and other Republicans. [...]

Bush spoke of the "Democrat majority" in his 2007 State of the Union Address.[24]  The advance copy that was given to members of Congress read "Democratic  majority."[6]  Democrats again complained about the use of "Democrat" as an adjective in the address. "Like nails on a chalkboard," [...]

Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh uses the term almost exclusively when referring to Democrats.[27]

Alaska governor and Republican Party vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin used the term during the 2008 United States presidential campaign.[28][29] [...]

No wonder whenever I hear it, it always annoys the hell out of me -- it could be talking heads that hurl this intentional 2-word slight in the first place ...

Why do Republicans call their opposition "The Democrat Party" every chance they get?  

Opinions vary, but it's not because they are trying to be "grammatically correct" ...

The “Ic” Factor
by Hendrik Hertzberg, NewYorker -- Aug 7, 2006

[...] The American Heritage College Dictionary, for example, defines the noun “Democratic Party” as “One of the two major US political parties, owing its origin to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party under Andrew Jackson in 1828.” (It defines “Democrat n” as “A Democratic Party member” and “Democratic adj” as “Of, relating to, or characteristic of the Democratic Party,” but gives no definition for—indeed, makes no mention of -- “Democrat Party n” or “Democrat adj”.) Other dictionaries, and reference works generally, appear to be unanimous on these points. The broader literate public also comes down on the “Democratic” side, as indicated by frequency of usage. A Google search for “Democratic Party” yields around forty million hits. “Democrat Party” fetches fewer than two million.

There’s no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. “Democrat Party” is a slur, or intended to be -- a handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but “Democrat Party” is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screamsrat.” At a slightly higher level of sophistication, it’s an attempt to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation. [...]

[...] Luntz, who road-tested the adjectival use of “Democrat” with a focus group in 2001, has concluded that the only people who really dislike it are highly partisan adherents of the -- how you say? -- Democratic Party. “Those two letters actually do matter,” Luntz said [...]

So how should members the Democratic Party respond to these not-so-subtle put-downs from the Republican Party?

a) Nod and ignore it?

b) Confront and correct the political slur?

c) Reply in kind, with derogatory terms of our own?

So far finding a suitable naming calling label to counter with has proven challenging to say the least.  Here are some of the common contenders:







Party of No

But none of these rubber & glue replies seem destined to rise to National prominence as the derogatory use of that label:  Tax and Spend "DemocRAT Party."

Maybe we should just "let sleeping does lie"?

But in that case who are "the dogs" ... and who is doing most of the insidious lying?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site