A recommended list diary on RedState is titled Horny Feminists Now Want Subsidized Sex. It has ten favorable comments including “Very Good Rant” and “What's next, subsidized Doritos for stoners?”
I did some opposition research to see where the right stands on Limbaugh's slut comment. Nikitas3 offers this analysis which was well received by his peers.
First, those “forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law” are paying $60,000 a year to go to Georgetown and they are worried about the $1,000 a year they need to spend for sex? Ever heard of “saying no” or “cutting costs” or “giving up things” or “behaving like a lady”? Or using the “rhythm method” of natural birth control? Or “asking the guy to wear a condom”? Or “asking him for the money”? Unbelievable. These girls are such trash. No decent parent would want their daughter to act like that. And then these girls mostly end up being useless feminist lawyers. You know, the emotional terrorists that no man really wants but whom liberal men need desperately. For sex.
Smell the fear (and lust) of educated and liberated women of strong conviction that men "desperately need. For Sex."
Well, Georgetown Law proves it’s true. Because all these sex-crazed tarts at Georgetown are destined to become Democrat barristers who harm society endlessly with their stupidity (i.e., we must subsidize sex, we must put up windmills, we must be nice to terrorists etc.). Many will never have children because they are taught to hate children. Many will never marry because they are such repugnant beings that no man wants them (i.e., Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Janet Reno, Molly Yard, Barbara Mikulski etc.)And these girls are not only dumb as a bag of hammers, but they are narcissistic and heartless like so many of the sex hounds in America. Like all those horny guys who, throughout history, impregnate women and then run away, never to see their child.
Sex hound expert Nikitas3 rails on about tarts who carry on without the protective control and ownership of men.
What is the root cause for this rampant libertine tartiness that is sweeping Georgetown?
Actually this sexual addition is no different from any other addiction – drugs, cigarettes, alcohol, food etc. And addictions are simply human weaknesses that can be overcome by disciplined people. Yet the sexually-addicted Georgetown culture is somehow supposed to be A) different and B) entitled to have somebody else financing their addiction Addictions must be conquered, not accommodated. But liberals believe that somebody else must pay for their addictions because they sure cannot control their primitive urges. And don’t think for a second that the sex addicts in our culture are “having more fun” than everyone else. They are not. All addictive behavior runs to extremes and finally destroys people. The addicts get “high” from the sex but then there is a very dark side to their behavior and they get very, very “low”. And then they need to get “high” again. And if you look realistically at this cycle you then see the truth. It is a dead end… like all the rest of socialism. It fits perfectly.
Nikitas3 is also apparently an addiction expert.
He is an angry man obsessed with addiction who degrades women, fears sex, and lives in a fact free political fantasy world.
The Limbaugh’s rants are not just the misspoken “absurd” ravings of an entertainer. They are strategic salvos fired to dismantle hard earned freedoms in the War on Women, and they resonate with many of the bloggers on RedState. Bloggers driven by fear, hate, and their own inner demons.
The right is on the move to roll back civil rights on all fronts.