Drone-making companies are some of the most powerful in the country, and they have a lot of pals in Washington, including the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Buck McKeon. He's also co-chair of the 60-member
Unmanned Systems Caucus. The caucus comprises 45 Republicans and 15 Democrats, three of whom are members of the Blue Dog Coalition.
Jill Replogle writes:
You’ve probably heard of the Congressional Black Caucus, or perhaps the Progressive Caucus. But what about the drone caucus? Officially, it’s the Unmanned Systems Caucus.
Primarily, the caucus advocates for drones — those pilot-less planes infamous for their role targeting insurgents in Afghanistan and Pakistan. They’re used as a spy tool in Iran, a drug-fighting tool in Mexico and an anti-smuggling tool along the U.S.-Mexico border. [...]
“It’s definitely a powerful caucus,” said Alex Bronstein-Moffly, an analyst with First Street Research Group, a D.C.-based company that analyzes lobbying data.
“It’s probably up there in the more powerful caucuses that sort of is not talked about.” And, he says, caucus members are well placed to influence government spending and regulations. [...]
The caucus is co-chaired by 10-term Congressman Howard P. “Buck” McKeon, a Republican from Southern California who also chairs the House Armed Services Committee. He shares the drone caucus chair with Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar of Texas.
The caucus includes eight members who also sit on the House Committee on Appropriations, which largely controls the government’s purse strings.
Many of the drone caucus members are well supported by the industry they endorse. According to Bronstein-Moffly’s data, the 58 drone caucus members received a total of $2.3 million in contributions from political action committees affiliated with drone manufacturers since 2011.
Blast from the Past. At Daily Kos on this date in 2007:
How do you mark the beginning of Islamic extremism? There are any number of denominational schisms, publications, and incidents that might be pointed out. However, if you read the works of Iranian Nobel Prize winner, Shirin Ebadi, she frequently points to Operation Ajax as the event that boosted the fundamentalists from a laughable sideshow, into a viable and rapidly growing faction.
Though it's oddly missing from US history books, Operation Ajax was the successful CIA-supported overthrow of the popular, Prime Minister of Iran and his replacement by the Shah.
Iranians were hired to protest Mossadegh and fight pro-Mossadegh demonstrators. Anti- and pro-monarchy protesters violently clashed in the streets, leaving almost three hundred dead. The operation was successful in triggering a coup, and within days, pro-Shah tanks stormed the capital and bombarded the Prime Minister's residence.
The US wanted the Shah in power because they feared Iran might "go communist," and the saw the Shaw as more reliablely "pro-western." The UK wanted the prime minister replaced because they wanted back into the Iranian oil fields. The code word to start the operation was broadcast on the BBC. The Shah was Our Good Friend.
Tweet of the Day:
There is a huge amount of policy space between "reduces CO2" and "reduces CO2
enough."
— @drgrist via TweetDeck
Tune in Monday to Friday from 9-11 AM ET for Daily Kos Radio, hosted by David Waldman a/k/a KagroX. You can listen
here.
High Impact Posts. Top Comments.