Skip to main content

Solar energy is one of the fastest-growing industries in the country. Solar PV installations grew 109% in 2011, and the industry now employs over 100,000 Americans. Yet it is almost invisible in Virginia. The installed total in the commonwealth is about 5 megawatts (MW), a pittance compared to the 1,200 MW in California and over 800 in New Jersey. Maryland and North Carolina each have more than ten times as much solar PV as we do.

Part of the reason is our lack of incentives. Unlike many other states in the northeast and mid-Atlantic, Virginia offers no tax credits or rebates on solar systems to supplement the federal tax credit. And our voluntary renewable portfolio standard is so flabby that our utilities will never need solar to meet it.

Virginia also isn’t known for getting out ahead of the curve on energy. Instead of embracing the promise of clean power, the state clings to an old energy model dominated by fossil fuels. Just this year, the General Assembly renewed a subsidy that takes about $45 million every year out of the pockets of taxpayers to support coal mining.

But as a recent article in the New York Times Magazine described (http://www.nytimes.com/...), the future has come knocking. With the price of solar energy tumbling, solar now makes economic sense across much of the country. New financing models make it possible to install solar with no upfront capital cost to the customer, who may see immediate savings over grid-delivered “brown” energy.

Among these new models, leases have become especially popular for homeowners and businesses, but only power purchase agreements (PPAs) allow non-profits to take advantage of tax credits. Under a PPA, the solar installer retains ownership of the solar system and uses the tax credits to offset profits, passing along the savings as it sells the power to the nonprofit.

PPAs could permit the solar market in Virginia to blossom in a big way. Colleges and universities, private schools, churches, charities and local governments are now looking at solar systems as a way to meet carbon-reduction targets and reduce energy costs over the long haul.

Unfortunately, this new enthusiasm has run headlong into the immovable force known as Dominion Power. Dominion blocked a PPA at Washington & Lee University last fall, and its threat of legal action has kept other non-profits from moving forward with plans for solar installations.

Dominion is a regulated monopoly in Virginia, a status that gives it the sole right to sell power in its territory, with a few exceptions. One of the exceptions gives sellers of 100% renewable electricity the right to sell to Dominion’s customers if the company itself doesn’t offer that option—which, indisputably, it does not. (Its Green Power Program relies on certificates, not actual green electricity.)

So Dominion’s interpretation of the statute appears to be wrong on its face, but one of the nice things about being a giant monopoly is that you have more lawyers and more money than the people you threaten.  

Unable to fund a lawsuit, the solar industry tried last year to get relief from the General Assembly in the form of HB 129, a bill that would have made explicit the right of renewable energy companies to sell power to their customers through PPAs. Delegate Jerry Kilgore (R-Gate City) shepherded the bill through the House, where it passed without a single dissenting vote. Once in the Senate, though, it was “carried over” (effectively, killed) by a Senate committee stacked with Dominion allies like Dick Saslaw (D-Fairfax) and Chairman John Watkins (R-Midlothian).

Quick quiz, but not a toughie: according to the Virginia Public Access Project, www.vpap.org, who is the top donor to the campaign chests of Dick Saslaw and John Watkins?

The failure of HB 129 leaves a lot of would-be solar and wind customers in limbo, keeps Virginia companies from growing and adding jobs, and prevents churches, colleges and universities from benefiting from the federal tax credits that are available to residents of other states where PPAs are common.

It has also given Dominion a black eye with the public and local officials. Critics say the heavy-handed effort to squash small solar companies shows the utility giant has grown overly complacent about its status as the most powerful force in Richmond.  

Dominion should back down from its unreasonable opposition to PPAs. It has little to lose by allowing private companies the space to compete and innovate in a market Dominion itself doesn’t serve. And if it won’t back off, then the public needs to remind its legislators who they serve. Hint: it’s not supposed to be Dominion.

Originally posted to Power for the People on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM PDT.

Also republished by Virginia Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Since the breakdown is occurring (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jam

    with the transfer of energy from an owner to a customer - if I understand, this is how Dominion is able to interfere - couldn't there be some end-run solution by having institutional customers band together to collectively own their systems?  In other words, rather than buying the power, they buy a share of ownership that corresponds to the value of the power covered by a supply contract?  Or something like that.

    Republicans would rather live in shit than be seen working a shovel.

    by Troubadour on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 11:44:54 AM PDT

    •  maybe, but (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      semiot, Troubadour

      the problem lies in that our Congress, in its infinite wisdom, has located our "National Energy Policy" (such as it is) in the tax code. Non-profits can't take advantage of the incentives because they are all tax based. Universities such as Washington and Lee need to partner with private companies who can use the tax credits in order to access the incentives.

      Kiss my ass. This is a Holy Site...

      by jam on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 12:22:57 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  only power purchase agreements (PPAs) allow ... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    semiot

    A lease should function the same way as far as moving incentives from the private entity to the public entity. The only issue with the lease is that the weather risk is moved from the developer to the non-profit. If the weather under performs the estimate that went into determining the fixed price lease value then the public entity "loses" money.

    Kiss my ass. This is a Holy Site...

    by jam on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 12:30:09 PM PDT

    •  leases won't work for non-profits (0+ / 0-)

      If I understand your comment correctly, you're thinking leases should have the same effect as PPAs. Unfortunately the tax code provision that addresses the Production Tax Credit explicitly excludes non-profits and governmental units from eligibility. See the instructions to Form 3468.

      •  No (0+ / 0-)

        First, we were talking about the ITC (solar isn't eligible for the PTC).

        Second, the private party is the owner of the system while the non-profit leases the system from them.

        see here

        Secure Futures, through its subsidiary Lexington Solar, LC, purchased and owns the solar panels on the W&L campus. W&L hosts the solar facility, and leases the equipment from Lexington Solar. Using economic stimulus funds provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, the Virginia Deparment of Mines, Minerals and Energy awarded an incentive grant for the project. ARRA funds through the US Treasury 1603 Investment Tax Credit grant also helped finance this project.
        By "moving the incentive" from private to public, what I meant was that the for-profit entity (Secure Futures) is able to charge the non-profit entity (Washington & Lee University) less for the lease since Secure Futures has the ITC money.

        Kiss my ass. This is a Holy Site...

        by jam on Wed Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:17 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  The W&L deal had to be restructured (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          jam

          Yes, after Dominion sent cease and desist letters to Secure Futures, the deal was restructured from a PPA to a lease. They lost the tax credits but were able to make the deal work with options that the company tells me are not available for projects after the end of 2011.

          Thanks for catching my error above--of course I meant ITC, which is addressed in form 3468.

  •  Here in Virginia we are are in the heart of (0+ / 0-)

    ignorance...anti earth...anti women...and anti human politics.  I came here in 1973 and was never able to see on hint of anything but regressive hateful thinking!

    An idea is not responsible for who happens to be carrying it at the moment. It stands or falls on its own merits.

    by don mikulecky on Mon Aug 20, 2012 at 02:57:13 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site