Is there anything wrong with steveholt's analysis here of the polling since the Obama/Romney debate? He shows that before the debate the ratio of polls from reputable organizations to polls from Republican hack pollsters was 50:24, whereas after the debate the ratio switches to 38:45.
I'm not a seasoned poll analyst, but it seems to me that the predominance of Republican skewed polls after the debate would wreak havoc with all the "average of polls" sites, including 538, TPM, and Huffpost Pollster, just as the author of the post above says. If so, all they have to do to make it look like Obama is losing is pump out more fake polls.
Am I missing something? Do these polling average sites do any kind of screening for Karl Rove's fake polling firms, or do they just allow right-wing hacks to alter their narrative so easily?