Skip to main content

Whatever you think of former President Bush's propaganda mouthpiece, Ari Fleischer, he knows his party's supporters.  And he was surprisingly blunt about stating that Republicans will always be against LGBT rights and women's rights.  Why?  Because they are the party of people who will never accept that LGBT people are real human beings deserving of equal rights under the law.  And they are also the party of Christian fundamentalists who want to tell women what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.

After a stinging election night defeat, President George W. Bush’s former White House secretary still says that the Republican Party will never support LGBT rights and reproductive rights for women.

“The big issue that Republicans are going to have to wrestle with is the Hispanic issue,” Ari Fleischer explained after President Barack Obama’s defeat of GOP hopeful Mitt Romney made it clear that the country was more liberal than he had expected.

“It’s not the social issues,” he insisted. “You’re not going to make the party pro-choice and pro-gay rights and think you’ve made the Republican party the party that’s the popular party. We have a party like that. It’s the Democratic Party.”

“But the Republican Party used to be against abortion,” CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin noted. “In the past year, they have become identified with opposition to contraception. That is, you know, moving backwards at a pace that is astonishing and politically disastrous.”

Yes, being against contraception is incredibly stupid, and having the Pope of Conservative Talk Radio, Rush Limbaugh go off on an extended months long and extraordinarily nasty (even by his standards) rant against one women for daring to claim the pill should be covered by health insurance plans was a clear demonstration that the Republican party doesn't see women as fully human either.  They are lesser beings in the eyes of Republicans whose fate is to bear and raise children and obey their husbands and fathers.  How often were women demonized by Republican candidates this year?  From Rick Santorum to Richard Mourdoch to everyone on the right you can possibly imagine women were blamed for rape, told that incest is "rare" so don't make such a big deal about it, blamed for being single parents and called "sluts" by a three times divorced fat man in a radio booth who took Viagra unlawfully on a vacation in the Dominican Republic, a known destination for sex tourists.

As for Gays, well, how many leading political figures in their party believe that Biblical law demands LGBT people be executed for the crime of being who they are?  Far too many.  How many people at a Republican debate booed a serving member of the US military for being gay? Far too many.  How many Republicans think "Faggot" is a legitimate term for use in civil conversation?   Far too many.  How many Republicans view rules against the unrelenting verbal and physical bullying of LGBT youth as a violation of their religious and free speech rights?  Far too many.  How many times do we hear Republican-supporting religious conservatives blame natural catastrophes on the Homosexual agenda?  Far too often.  Who blames everything wrong in our society on the Homosexual agenda (when they aren't attacking scientists)?

Now, Ari also said the Republican party needs to find a way to attract more Hispanic voters to their party.  One question Ari.  How are you planning to do that?  Your party opposes the Dream Act.  Its losing presidential candidate believes in self-deportation, even of children who have lived most of their lives in America, many of whom speak no Spanish, and that was the "moderate" position of your party. It re-elects time and time again, stated bigots and racists such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who believes that the only good Latino is one rotting away in his jail, and Steve King who called Latinos "dogs" and claimed that a compliment.  No Ari, all the Rubios in the world aren't going to cover up the stink that reeks from your party's default position that Latinos are worthless, illegal scum, criminals and thugs, and carriers of disease who take jobs away from real Americans (i.e., white males).  They hate Hispanics.

Yet, the most telling thing about Ari Fleischer's analysis of his party was what he didn't say.  He said not one word about the need to attract more African Americans to the Republican party.  I guess even he knows that Republicans = the party of bigots, white supremacists, neo-Nazis and "Confederate Heritage" lovers.  He knows that Republicans abandoned African Americans shortly after the Civil War.  He knows that the South is solidly Republican because they chose to pursue a "Southern Strategy" under Nixon that attracted bigoted Southern whites (and many Northern whites as well) to their party by opposing civil rights for African Americans.  A strategy Ronald Reagan honed to perfection. He knows there is no room under the Big White Tent that is the Republican Party for anything more than a few token blacks.  Why else would they go to such great lengths to disenfranchise and suppress the votes of that community?

Yes, Ari Fleischer knows his party well.  There's a saying that a tiger doesn't change its stripes.  Well, Ari, you and your fellow Republican operatives created this monster that feeds on fear, prejudice and hate.  You had a major hand in developing the careers of powerful Republicans for which hate and fear is their middle name: Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Steve King, Ron and Rand Paul, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and even Mittens Romney, to name but a few.  You can lament that fact all you want, but there is no silver bullet to slay the monstrous beast that is the present day Republican Party.  It's grown too large, too fast, and too powerful to just slither away and die.  It's not a phoenix that will erupt in flames and re-arise in a new more palatable form from the ashes.  Its a Hydra-headed Gorgon covered with deadly poisonous snakes.

And it is people like you, Ari, who made it that way.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site