Skip to main content

There are some themes we are all hearing from republicans during their public seppuku. There are the usual; the candidate wasn’t conservative enough, Christie sold us out, Sandy, etc.  A huge realization, that really distresses them, is that “America has Changed™”, i.e. there are a lot of ‘them’.

First, this is a tacit acceptance that they did poorly with “minorities”. Second, that the fundamental demographics are changing (although they are not happy about it). Third, they must develop a better relationship with some ‘select’ subgroups (I infer, “the ones most like us”) if they are to win presidential and senatorial elections - in other words, any election where gerrymandering doesn’t deliver for them. Fourth, republicans work hard, democrats don’t, at least most of them don’t. Especially the takers…the 48 percenters.

I see no real interest or serious efforts to improve their relationships with AA, LBGT, prochoice, etc. and some other constituents.  Though, as a side note, they may tone down some of the dog whistle use now that they have been alerted that we are not deaf or stupid.

The groups most often coveted are the Hispanics/Latinos and perhaps Asians.  Please note how they want to think-of-and-treat these folks as a collective. The thesis is simply put, “you have come here for a better life and you work hard, you have family values, you are socially conservative, we should be your party of choice.” But one sign of puzzlement seems to bubble up in the form of a declarative interrogative, “we believe in getting ahead because of our OWN hard work so why aren’t YOU attracted to us?”.

I believe this is going to be one of the fundamental assertions used to develop the language and framing for a recruitment strategy. I have been hearing the republican refrain, “we believe in hard work”, as if they owned it for some time. I think it will become an even bigger touchstone as part of their efforts. One lesson we have learned is the importance of framing and the “ownership” and therefore the functional definition of certain words.

Here is my question for this learned and august group. Are there any sociological, psychological, economic studies that have measured potential differences between democrats and republicans in assessment of work effort, hours worked, etc.? This is not my area so I may not be using the correct terminology. What are the ‘facts’, and how do we push back against this propaganda?

Thank you, as always I look forward with delight to your thoughts.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  beagelowned (0+ / 0-)

    Above all, we worked harder and smarter than those claiming we were lazy and looking for handouts.

    •  Hi Trenz, thank you for responding. (0+ / 0-)

      I agree with your take on our work to help the president get elected. In case I wasn't clear, I am interested in the claim I often hear republicans make, "they work hard" and by inference that democrats don't. I mean in their/our jobs, i.e. making a living. I would love to know if there is any data on that. You know facts....which seem to have such a liberal bias!!!  8-)

      Does that make sense?

      Again, thanks for reading and taking the time to write.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site