Skip to main content

As I listen to the post-election chatter, online and on air, I keep feeling that the key point is being missed:

There is a ceiling to how much can be accomplished by political ads!

Lots of folks are talking about the achievements or lack thereof by Rove's dark money. Good points are made on all sides of this issue:

- It's crucial to have established the fact that big money can be beaten.

- However, the dark money investors aren't going anywhere and will be back.

- They DID affect the race, lowering our winning margins, making us spend money, and winning down ballot races.

- There is a danger that this result will be used to DEFEND Citizen's United.

- It's hard to see how we can replicate this result time after tie with the finite resources available to average folks who have real life to live.

All true, and all important. This result DID NOT remove the threat of Citizen's United.

BUT ...

Think about this tactically. No matter what side you're on, what did you see as the result of this election?

Carpet-bombing advertisements had limited, in some cases negative success! Like all ads, political spots reach a limit of effectiveness and law of diminishing returns when they reach a saturation point. People just tune out, often angrily. At a certain point, you are not gaining anything by spending more money on ads.

In my view, this TACTICAL fact will have significant implications for future campaigns. I see these on 2 levels:

1. Political campaigns will be aware of an effectiveness ceiling and they will strategize accordingly.

2. The American people are increasingly learning to tune these message out. My hope is in the day when as a nation we learn to process political ads (and MSM!) in the way that Russians learned to process state propaganda, understanding it for what it is. This year's deluge of appalling message overkill--both in terms of quality and of GOP lying--I think will harm GOP credibility for years to come.

Now, given the above: here's the encouragement. We can compete!

See, the only application of huge money that makes any sense is in political ads. And that is where we have seen that a ceiling on effectiveness will always give us a chance to compete.

In every other aspect of campaigning and political organization, we know we can compete.

Of course, this is no promise of nirvana. Our side will always be subject to fatigue. They can hire thousands of mercenaries and we have to recruit people to set aside their lives for a time. Our challenge is to keep up the pressure, cycle after cycle. That scares me.

But at least we can take comfort in knowing that there is a limit to what Dark Money can buy. We're in the game!

Here's a link to my previous diary on this point: Citizen's United: the Opportunity.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (0+ / 0-)

    "I'm a dweller on the threshold ..."

    by thresholder on Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 09:15:20 AM PST

  •  thresholder - is there a single source for (0+ / 0-)

    actual Fortune 1000 corporate campaign activity? I read that Chevron gave $1 million to a GOP House PAC, but I have not seen a list of other activity. Corporations can't contribute directly to candidates for federal office (The Tillman Act of 1907) but is there a group identifying actual corporate contributions? Both Pepsi and Coke gave $1 million each to the YES on 30 campaign in California and Monsanto and many other corporations funded the NO on 37 campaign. I haven't read about much more.

    I know there are sources for individual contributions by employer, but I am interested in actual shareholder assets being used in the political process.

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 09:27:05 AM PST

  •  The flip side may be social media- no ceiling yet (0+ / 0-)

    to the effectiveness of savvy social media. I think younger (translate: more progressive) political activists will get more and more mileage out of YouTube, Twitter and the like in future elections, wiping out a lot of the sheer-volume advantage of the big-money GOP campaigns.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site