Skip to main content

Among the many conservative political pundits whose blown predictions made them look foolish, I have particularly enjoyed those like Pat, who claim to have heard from their gods about such cosmic trivialities as who will win the next election.

Pat Robertson and CBN were as stunned and dumbfounded by the defeat of Mitt Romney, which is saying something, considering that he personally claimed that his god told him who would win back in January, and then later in the year his network predicted a GOP sweep.

Thanks to Right Wing Watch, I got to see an interesting clip of how believers like Robertson work to convince themselves that their own opinions are somehow divinely inspired.

So this was Pat & crew, boggled by their defeat a couple weeks ago.

The Christian Broadcasting Network put on an election night special and host Pat Robertson appeared to be dumbfounded that President Obama won re-election. Robertson’s guests included Fred Barnes of The Weekly Standard, John Fund of the Wall Street Journal, Regent University vice president Paul Bonicelli and Romney adviser Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, the legal group Robertson founded. Barnes reassured Robertson that even if Obama wins, the President “hardly has a mandate for anything” because “this was a status quo election,” as apparently Barnes thinks any incumbent who gets re-elected doesn’t have a mandate. But Sekulow said that Obama will likely appoint two or three justices to the Supreme Court and will use the power of the executive branch to push new “encroachments on liberty and freedom.”

Robertson, who throughout the program held out hope that Karl Rove’s prediction that Romney could win Ohio would materialize, was stunned that Obama was the winner: “What have they got? He doesn’t seem to have any program and yet he’s been able to win a re-election, what is going on with the American people?” Bonicelli said that Americans will spend their next four years “regretting this decision” and Robertson warned that the U.S. is looking more like Western Europe and even Zaire.

Just another scene of many, of Republican pundits buying into their own propaganda, their own wishful thinking masquerading as certainty based on data from the real world. Dime a dozen at this point. Never mind that some supposed religious network puts on an 'election night special' worthy of Fox; we're long past the point of the religious right lining up their churches and their flocks of sheep as an extension of the GOP.

More recently, the subject came up again as Pat was attempting to respond to someone who thought they'd heard one thing from their god, only to find reality going in a somewhat different direction. And since Pat had claimed the same thing himself and got it wrong too, I'm sure he can understand this dilemma.

In January, televangelist Pat Robertson told 700 Club viewers that in his annual New Year’s “conversation” with God, the Almighty had revealed to him who the next president would be. Up through Election Day, Robertson harshly criticized President Obama and the Democratic Party while praising Mitt Romney. Then, Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network predicted a GOP sweep, leaving Robertson utterly confounded by Obama’s victory.

Today, responding to a question from a viewer who wondered why her business is struggling since she thought God told her it would be successful, Robertson admitted that he sometimes misses God’s message. “So many of us miss God, I won’t get into great detail about elections but I sure did miss it, I thought I heard from God, I thought I had heard clearly from God, what happened?” Robertson replied, “You ask God, how did I miss it? Well, we all do and I have a lot of practice.”

RWW quotes Pat in reference to his/god's blown call for the presidency, but I found the preceding...teaching, fascinating.

You have to practice the presence of god, practice the voice of god, practice hearing from god, and then check to see if indeed you are hearing from him.
Assuming for the sake of argument that one does 'hear from god' I could maybe understand having to work at it. Checking it, against what I wonder? Probably cherry-pick some bible verses that comfort you, sure. What about the rest? Who has to practice 'the presence of god' aside from the god-concept itself? What about practicing its 'voice'?

To me, this sounds like Pat is giving away the goods on his method: he has practiced how to sound like his words come from his god; he has practiced its 'presence,' how to give his preaching the right appearance and tone; to use the right wordings out of their holy book. To make his own opinions look like not just his opinions, but coming down to us from on high.

And clearly in the case of the presidential election, he fooled even himself. He 'heard from god' -- got a prediction, had his network CBN call it for Republicans -- and blew it. He never came out and said plainly that god told him Romney would win, but it's clear that this is what he thought. Can't blame the god-concept of course, it must have known better, it must be blameless. He could suggest that he got the prediction from...elsewhere, but what would that do to his reputation to be hoodwinked by his supernatural adversary?

Much easier to admit that he fakes it. I doubt that his flock will catch it through the word-salad obfuscation, and they wouldn't want to see it that way regardless.

Originally posted to The Tytalan Way on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 10:15 AM PST.

Also republished by Street Prophets and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site