Skip to main content

Yesterday, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a new report that it commissioned on "The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis."

Local papers are likely to cover this. I learned about it through the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Today's AJC article says that the Medicaid expansion would bring in some $33 billion in federal dollars over 10 years, while costing $2.5 billion. (These numbers come from Table ES-2 on page 9 of the report.) But the AJC did not mention the report's estimate of how the Medicaid expansion would allow Georgia (and all states) to save money through reductions in uncompensated care. The AJC only reported on the incremental change in Medicaid spending and ignored the change in state spending on uncompensated care due to expansion. Nationwide figures are shown below.

In the aggregate, states will actually save $10 billion over the first ten years, if all states go forward with Medicaid expansion. The report also presents state-by-state numbers on the net cost/savings of Medicaid expansion (in Table ES-4 on page 11).

For example, Iowa and Maine are both states where the governor apparently opposes Medicaid expansion. In Iowa, the net total comes out to $546 million in SAVINGS to the state and 20 thousand additional people with health insurance. In Maine, the net total comes out to $690 million in SAVINGS to the state and 29 thousand additional people with health insurance. So case closed for activists in those states.

In Georgia, the net cost of Medicaid expansion was estimated to actually be $1.814 billion, after including the $726 million in savings from reductions in uncompensated care. So the AJC never mentions the real cost to the state's coffers, which came in at $1.8 billion over 10 years.

But still, that's a good chunk of money...some 370 dollars per year for each person that would receive expanded Medicaid in Georgia. Or a dollar a day....one dollar a day. Anyways.

The report's executive summary also highlights how "net state savings are likely to be even greater because of other state fiscal gains that we could not estimate based on 50-state data." The authors go on to say that their figures "should be considered an overestimate of costs or an underestimate of savings if states were to implement the Medicaid expansion." This point was also highlighted in the summary slide from yesterday's conference call briefing.

(orange arrows mine)

In Georgia, just one of the various types of savings that could not be included for lack of 50 state data is the State Health Insurance Tax. If the Medicaid expansion does indeed occur, then this tax alone will be worth an estimated $750 million in revenue from just Medicaid and CHIP  during 2014-2023 (Source: Georgia Dept of Community Health. June 2012. Medicaid Financial Update: Presentation to DCH Board. PDF). Georgia will undoubtedly lose a large chunk of this revenue (maybe half?) if the Medicaid expansion does not go forward. And that's just one of the several types of additional savings from expanding Medicaid.

The report has more detailed information about the uncounted savings:

Such gains [i.e. additional savings] fall into three main categories: increased federal matching rates for current-law beneficiaries other than those covered through 1115 waivers or limited benefit programs; reduced state spending on non-Medicaid health care previously furnished to uninsured residents with incomes below 138% FPL; and additional revenue, including general revenue increases caused by the boost to state economic activity that would result from increased federal Medicaid dollars being spent within the state. In addition, certain states that provide Medicaid coverage to individuals with incomes above 138% FPL could transition this coverage to Health Insurance Exchanges whether or not the states implement the Medicaid expansion.
(brackets mine)

As the authors of the report say, their net totals "should be considered an overestimate of costs or an underestimate of savings if states were to implement the Medicaid expansion." In the several states where politicians are severely lacking in compassion, we may still require more comprehensive analyses on a state-by-state basis to capture the additional expected savings.

Snippets from the AJC story:

"Report: Medicaid expansion would bring state more than $30 billion"

Expanding Georgia’s massive Medicaid health care program would cost the state roughly $2.5 billion over a decade, while providing half a million poor, uninsured Georgians with coverage, a new study estimates.

[snip]

Gov. Nathan Deal has said Georgia can’t afford to expand the program, which is already facing a shortfall of hundreds of millions of dollars, even with the substantial federal help. Deal’s budget office pegs the cost of Obamacare and a Medicaid expansion to the state at $3.7 billion through 2022.

[snip]

“Regardless of whether the new costs are $2.5 billion, $4.5 billion or $6.5 billion, the state of Georgia doesn’t have the money to pay for it without a huge tax increase, crowding out all other spending or both,” Robinson said.

Proponents of expansion argue the state’s estimates don’t include potential savings that could result by lowering the state’s costs of caring for uninsured patients and keeping people healthier and out of the hospital. About one in five Georgians doesn’t have insurance.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This is important information. (9+ / 0-)

    I jutst read this morning in the Chicago Tribune that IL will experience a 5% increase in costs to expand Medicaid.  No mention of the cost saving derived from uncompensated medical expenses that have been occurring before the expansion.  
    Thanks for posting this!

    Take Back Our Country? We Built That? HaHaHa! Barack Obama: 332; Mitt Romney: 206. HaHaHa!

    by ChiTownDenny on Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 01:04:29 PM PST

    •  re (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ChiTownDenny, ExStr8, Lujane

      that ~5% is from Table 1, which is basically useless because it compares a scenario without ACA to a scenario with ACA and with Medicaid expansion.

      Table 2 compares better scenarios. It shows a scenario with ACA but no Medicaid expansion and a scenario with ACA and with Medicaid expansion. This is the decision before the states: either expand Medicaid or don't. They have no real say on ACA. So the incremental impact of Medicaid expansion is 1.7% of the budget. When you look at Table 4 and include the $953 million in savings in uncompensated care, Illinois has a net incremental cost of $1.26 billion over 10 years, or 1.0% of the 2022 budget. Table 3 shows 408 thousand additional people insured by the Medicaid expansion in Illinois.

  •  Excellent report. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wbr, distraught, Lujane

    Many thanks.

    Stonewall was a RIOT!

    by ExStr8 on Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 04:15:11 PM PST

  •  Yes, great information (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    distraught, Lujane

    & much appreciated from one of those uninsured....
    thank you

    ...inspiration moves me brightly

    by wbr on Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 05:11:58 PM PST

  •  Florida would save $100,000,000 each year (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sylv, distraught, Lujane, CherryTheTart

    http://thinkprogress.org/...

    Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) has been an outspoken opponents of President Obama’s landmark health reform law over the past year. Back in July, he announced that his state would not be setting up a health insurance exchange or expanding the Medicaid program under Obamacare, even though his state has some of the worst rates of uninsurance in the nation.

    But now that Obama has won re-election and the health law’s implementation is marching forward, Scott has showed some signs that he may consider softening his stance. And a new report from Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute could give him even more reason to do, since it concludes that Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion would save Florida about $100 million each year while extending health coverage to those who need it most

    Others have simply gotten old. I prefer to think I've been tempered by time.

    by Just Bob on Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 05:26:52 PM PST

    •  great link (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Lujane

      It also says

      Other researchers have also documented the potential cost-saving effects of expanding Medicaid in Arizona, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Arkansas
      The report I linked to in the diary says these states would have net costs from the Medicaid expansion, although there is the disclaimer about the savings being underestimated. It would be worth while to compare these different studies and summarize how these studies that find a cost-savings were able to account for different types of savings. Perhaps the link (in my diary) under "one of the various types of savings" could provide a structure for such summaries.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site