Skip to main content


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Senator Tom Harkin (D. IA) undoubtedly has a terrific record sticking up for the little guy.  He's a true blue public servant not just for the good people of Iowa but for every hardworking American.  But if there is one thing Harkin will (and should) always be remembered for it's his great work for people with disabilities.  Harkin is known for authoring the Americans with Disabilities Act back in 1990.  This landmark legislation protects the civil rights of more than 54 million Americans with physical and mental disabilities.  Harkin has also taken the lead in the Senate to improve education opportunities for children with disabilities.  He's a hero to those with disabilities and a hero in my eyes.  Unfortunately, I can't say the same for Harkin's colleague, Senator Chuck Grassley (R. IA) and his 37 other GOP Senators:

http://wcfcourier.com/...


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The defeat Tuesday in the U.S. Senate of an international treaty purportedly aimed at eliminating international discrimination against people with disabilities split the votes of Iowa's two senators.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, joined 37 other Republicans in saying no, leaving the measure five votes short. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, joined 60 others, including eight Republicans, who voted in favor of the treaty.

The agreement, negotiated under President George W. Bush's administration and signed in 2009 by President Barack Obama, is opposed by anti-abortion groups, advocates for home-schooling and others. They argue the measure encourages abortion overseas and impinges on the rights of American parents to educate their children. - WCF Courier, 12/5/12

With 38 Republicans casting "no" votes, the 61-38 vote fell five short of the two-thirds majority needed to ratify a treaty.  The treaty has already been signed by 155 nations and ratified by 126 countries.  The treaty is meant to make sure that people with disabilities all over the world are guaranteed the same rights and freedoms as their fellow citizens.

The treaty the news story is referring to is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.  Supporters of the treaty argue that the treaty is common sense legislation that would help other countries laws mirror the Americans with Disabilities Act aimed to help disabled Americans overseas.  The treaty has the backing of major disability groups.  Former Senate Majority leader Bob Dole (R. KS), a longtime advocate for people with disabilities, even returned to Washington D.C. to come out in support of the treaty.  But off course Grassley and the 37 other Republicans ignored Dole and instead listened to this guy:


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The reason I have so strongly opposed CRPD is also simple. Karen and I have experienced first-hand as we care for our little blessing, Bella, that parents and caregivers care most deeply and are best equipped to care for the disabled. Not international bureaucrats.

CRPD—whatever its intentions—has many troubling aspects.

There is not a clear definition of “disability” in the treaty, which means some committee at the U.N. will decide after ratification who is covered—an example of what is at the heart of the problem. CRPD gives too much power to the U.N., and the unelected, unaccountable committee tasked with overseeing its implementation, while taking power and responsibility away from our elected representatives and, more important, from parents and caregivers of disabled persons. - Rick Santorum, The Daily Beast, 12/5/12

Rick Santorum spewing that "government overreach" rhetoric claiming the U.N. is taking away the rights from parents.  But that's not really the case here for why Santorum pushed Republicans to vote down this treaty:

http://www.omaha.com/...

Some have criticized the treaty as undermining U.S. sovereignty and threatening parental rights on such issues as home-schooling. Former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., has helped lead a charge against the measure.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Some abortion rights opponents have singled out a section of the treaty that calls for providing the disabled “the same range, quality and standard of free or affordable health care and programs ... including in the area of sexual and reproductive health and population-based public health programs.” They say the bill promotes abortion overseas and could undermine efforts to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion. - Omaha World-Herald Bureau, 12/4/12

Senator Jim Inhofe spoke against the treaty claiming the treaty to be a threat to U.S. national sovereignty:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

"I do not support the cumbersome regulations and potentially overzealous international organizations with anti-American biases that infringe upon American society," said Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. - Huffington Post, 12/4/12

Except that the treaty isn't a threat to U.S. sovereignty:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Proponents said there was no evidence to suggest an impact on U.S. sovereignty, and they disputed that it would encourage abortion or affect parents’ ability to raise their children. Harkin has spoken of the disabled overseas being kept in deplorable conditions and in isolation. The treaty, he said, would give Americans, particularly those with disabilities, a seat at the international table from which they could influence other countries.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

“We are the best in the world at this,” said Harkin, the primary author of the Americans with Disabilities Act. “This treaty will make us a better world in which to live.” - WCF Courier, 12/5/12

At least Grassley was honest about his reason for voting "no"... sort of:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

"These provisions call into question the purpose of the convention regarding abortion rights and the fundamental rights of parents to determine how best to raise their children," he said. - WCF Courier, 12/5/12

Oh yeah, this teabagger lead the opposition in the Senate:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The opposition was led by tea party favorite Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who argued that the treaty by its very nature threatened U.S. sovereignty. Specifically he expressed concerns that the treaty could lead to the state, rather than parents, determining what was in the best interest of disabled children in such areas as home schooling, and that language in the treaty guaranteeing the disabled equal rights to reproductive health care could lead to abortions. Parents, Lee said, will "raise their children with the constant looming threat of state interference." - Huffington Post, 12/4/12

Senator John Kerry (D. MA), a strong supporter of the treaty and Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, defended the treaty:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

"It really isn't controversial," Kerry, D-Mass., said. "What this treaty says is very simple. It just says that you can't discriminate against the disabled. It says that other countries have to do what we did 22 years ago when we set the example for the world and passed the Americans with Disabilities Act."


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

In a statement after the vote, Kerry said it was "one of the saddest days I've seen in almost 28 years in the Senate and it needs to be a wake-up call about a broken institution that's letting down the American people." - Huffington Post, 12/4/12


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Senator Harkin called the vote a “shameful day in our history.”  There's no other way to put.  Republicans folding under pressure from right-wing, anti-choice extremists like Rick Santorum in denying disabled people around the country the same rights is absolutely shameful.  Grassley and the other 37 Republican Senators should be ashamed of themselves.  At least eight Republicans broke ranks from their party and voted in favor of the treaty and spoke highly of it:

http://blog.seattlepi.com/...


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities has been signed by 153 countries. It was negotiated by President Bush, and signed again by President Obama in 2009. Its Republican supporters have also included 2008 Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Indiana, defeated by a Tea Party candidate in the GOP primary last spring, made one of the final speeches of his 36 year Senate career in support of the treaty. “With these provisions, the United States can join the convention as an expression — an expression — of our leadership on disability rights without ceding any of out ability to decide for ourselves how best to address those issues in our laws,” said Lugar. - Seattle Pi, 12/4/12

McCain and Lugar were two of eight GOP Senators to vote for the treaty.  The other Republican Senators include Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, John Barrasso of Wyoming, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Susan Collins and Olympia Snow of Maine.

This vote is a terrific reminder of why we need to keep the Senate in Democratic control and why we need great men like Harkin in the Senate.  We need someone who stands up for the needs of the disabled and there's no one more dedicated to the cause than Tom Harkin.  Harkin is up for re-election in 2014.  he hasn't announced yet if he is going to retire but there's a good amount of reason to believe he will run for re-election:

http://amestrib.com/...


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

“He’s a relatively young, vigorous guy who shows no slackening interest in doing what he does,” said Drake political science professor Dennis Goldford, who has been following Iowa politics since 1985. “I wouldn’t be surprised to see Harkin give at least one more go.” - Ames Tribune, 11/10/12

Lets give Harkin a head start so he can continue to fight for the disabled in the U.S. Senate:


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

https://secure.actblue.com/...

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (11+ / 0-)

    Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

    by poopdogcomedy on Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 09:09:00 AM PST

  •  Harkin and Grassley are polar opposites, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    poopdogcomedy

    and yet the voters of my state keep reelecting both of them--they've been my Senators for my entire 25-year existence. It's baffling! Harkin is one of the most liberal Democrats in the Senate, and Grassley is pretty far to the right. I mean, I would understand if one or both were centrists, but they represent the opposite ends of the political spectrum. Iowa truly is a purple state in this sense--but it gives me hope that we can eventually replace Grassley with another solid liberal. :)

    "In an individual, selfishness uglifies the soul; for the human species, selfishness is extinction." -Cloud Atlas, by David Mitchell

    by rigcath on Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 10:21:57 AM PST

    •  I hear ya and I agree. But first things first, we (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      rigcath

      need to keep Harkin in the Senate for as long as we can.  I think he will run for re-election again but lets get him re-elected first and then see of Grandpa Grassley will call it quits in 2016.  

      Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

      by poopdogcomedy on Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 10:39:59 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Agreed. I think they're in a retirement standoff (0+ / 0-)

        As soon as the first one retires, the other will announce his retirement. Let's hope Grassley blinks first.

        "In an individual, selfishness uglifies the soul; for the human species, selfishness is extinction." -Cloud Atlas, by David Mitchell

        by rigcath on Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 10:55:30 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Harkin's strong leadership (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    operculum

    on disabilities is the result of having a deaf brother, same as John McCain. Oddly enough, in both cases, the death brother's name was Frank. Harkin would have been a good president had he won the nomination in '92.

    "Valerie, why am I getting all these emails calling me a classless boor?"

    by TLS66 on Thu Dec 06, 2012 at 11:36:50 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site