Skip to main content

C4 (Catastrophic Climate Chaos Cliff) threatens 383359478_3dd94a0fdf_m.jpgour future prospects and our ability to create a positive future reality for ourselves and descendents.

George Herbert Walker Bush lies at the core of a driving motivation in my life.

President Bush was facing a reelection battle against Bill Clinton, and so advisers persuaded him to attend the world environmental summit in Rio de Janeiro, possibly the most optiistic moment in recent history. Before he went, however, he told a press conference that "the American way of life is not up for negotiation." If that's true, if we can't imagine living any differently, then all else is mere commentary.
One thing that unites the progressive blogosphere is the drive to imagine a different life, a different world, a better one, a better path forward ... and we all, in our own ways, fight to achieve those visions.

Twenty years ago, the first President Bush stated that "the American Way of Life is not up for negotiation", showing an inability to imagine catastrophe from non-negotiation and an inability to see something better. Without imagination to see a better future and the power to achieve it, we will not progress out of catastrophe to prosperous sustainability.

A New Year's Resolution: I will imagine that better path and fight to achieve it.

And, I imagine life differently and it energizes me to fight to Energize America.

The quote comes from the 2006 paperback edition of Bill McKibben's The End of Nature. Put simply, all Americans should read The End of Nature (and move onto more recent McKibben work ... and look to join 350.org.) For a strengthening of our polity, High School 'global citizenship' programs should return and have this as part of the reading list to help foster an understanding the interactions of our lives with those around us (human and otherwise), today and into the future, and how these feed back to affect our own lives (out into the future).

The End of Nature is about Global Warming. Published first in 1989, McKibben wrote the first mass accessible book about Global Warming. "The End of Nature" refers to McKibben's (convincing) thesis that atmospheric changes due to CO2 (and related GHG) emissions have eliminated the concept of "untouched" wilderness and wrecked the notions of the constants of nature so central to core concepts of the world. (And, if serious in 1989, over 20 years later we are in a far worse situation requiring serious action to figure out a path not just to slow emissions but to return to 350 ppm. And, thus, the more recent McKibben book: Eaarth) McKibben calls on us (US) to think differently to try to avert the consequences he (and many experts) saw looking into the future.

In particular, my "imagine life differently" focus relates to energy issues and Global Warming. My casual concerns over these have turned to varying levels of fear and utter terror as I try to comprehend the world that we (collectively) are creating for ourselves and the future. I am learning ever more about the feedbacks and interconnections that are such a part of The End of Nature (and the more recent Eaarth).

I am a pessimistic optimist.

My pessimism envisions an extremely bleak future (sadly within far too near a term future), with terrifying economic (political, global, and perhaps conflict) havoc from Peak Oil and mass damage from Global Warming capped with a horrible die off to come.

My optimism drives a belief that I (that we) have something to say about this future. That we have the potential to change our path as per a talk given  in 2007

I am a CarboHolic. My last full tank was two days ago, my last plane flight a day ago, and I am beginning to feel withdrawal staved off by the CO2 emitted for the electricity to be on the web.

Let us face facts. ... Take a moment to put together a list of the top ten challenges for humanity for the 21st century. Your list might include global economic growth, health issues, hunger, environmental destruction, climate change, water, terrorism and others. When considering such a list, there is at least one common thread. All are worsened by a future dominated by an expensive, uncertain, unevenly available, polluting energy system. And, all will face eased solution with a future dominated by a clean, sustainable, readily accessible, fairly distributed, and reasonably priced (if not inexpensive) power solutions.

At this time, the United States is hurtling toward the cliff like Thelma & Louise, but we’re in our Hummers rather than a convertible. And, we are dragging the world ... and future generations ... behind us, bound hand and foot by our dangerous habits and shaky energy structure.

My name is A Siegel.  And, I am a CarboHolic.

Unlike President Bush, however, we are able to get past that first step in a twelve-step. We recognize the problem. And, we recognize that we are not powerless -- we have the ability to change, to take control of the situation, to turn ourselves away from that addiction. We decided to figure out what we (as individuals, communities, and country) could do about it.

And, we are acting to seek that change. To end that addiction. To set the path to Energize America for a sustainable and prosperous energy future.

In my life, From the Home to the Globe, I am striving to do my part to affect this change. Whether putting insulation in my roof, assisting organizations and businesses adopt better energy practices, participating in The Climate Reality Project, or communicating to others , I am striving to turn us away from that cliff.

As part of those efforts, three years ago, I accepted. Actually, I embraced DannyInLA's Challenge.

Six years ago, I promised to and now again repledge to diligently challenge those who seek to maintain a path hurtling over that cliff, whether that is inefficient Christmas light displays, McSUVs, not recyling aluminum cans, challenging astroturf or Global Warming enablers (like Robert J Samuelson or George Will, systematic journalistic malfeasance, and otherwise). I will CHALLENGE those who threaten a path toward a Prosperous, Climate-Friendly Society.
I take up Dannyinla's Challenge TO CHALLENGE those who do not comprehend the reality of the threats that Global Warming portend for us, US, and the future. I will take up that challenge TO CHALLENGE falsehoods, deceptions, and truthiness about energy and Global Warming threats and opportunities. I will take up that challenge TO CHALLENGE us all to imagine new and better paths forward, in an integrated conception of options to develop something better.

I can imagine life differently and I am terrified at the world that we are creating at a head-long pace.

I cannot any longer leave stand any comment about 'gasoline taxes are regressive'. Not anymore. Is there any "tax" more regressive than the damage that we are doing to the globe and the dangers it creates for the potential of human life in the years ahead? Politically inconvenient? Perhaps. But what is politics about but striving to create a better polity for all, and a better polity that is improving into the future? Without a meaningful confrontation of Global Warming, that future will not be better.

Nor can I leave stand comments about 'this is beyond us' or 'we can't do anything' or ... I refuse. ... Instead, I accept. No, I embrace Dannyinla's challenge to Challenge.

Six years ago, I pledged to Challenge.

While I've not always fully lived up to it and  the to do list grows longer rather than dissipates, the need for action and real achievement intensifies. There were failures, yet ... In my life, I do not know if I have ever made a New Year's Resolution with such import before 2007. And, I do not know if I've ever lived up to a New Year's resolution so resolutely before.

Thus, at the dawning of a New Year, it is time to pen one's hopes and plans for 2013.

For 2013, my New Year's Resolution is clear.

I pledge to continue to embrace DannyInLA's challenge to CHALLENGE.

And, I pledge to

Imagine Life Differently ...


Imagine it Better ...


And


Seek to create that better life ...

Join me in these two pledges.

383359478_3dd94a0fdf_m.jpgWe can all help make

America

Energy Smart.Ask yourself:

Are you doing your part?

Note: This is a modification of what was, originally, a 1 Jan 2007 post and has appeared many New Year's Days since then.

Originally posted to Climate Hawks on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 03:56 PM PST.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS and DK GreenRoots.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  In so many ways (10+ / 0-)

    it comes down to fear of change.

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 04:07:37 PM PST

    •  In many ways ... (11+ / 0-)

      What I was reading just prior to seeing your comment:

      Status Quo Bias  Status Quo Bias is an irrational preference for the current state of affairs. What’s interesting here is that the bias isn’t against inferior alternatives, or a lack of information on alternatives. It’s against ANY change from the status quo.

      Semmelweis Reflex  The Semmelweis Reflex is a metaphor for the reflex-like tendency to reject new evidence or knowledge simply because it contradicts established norms, beliefs or paradigms. As author Dr. Timothy Leary said, it’s a state where “…a discovery of important scientific fact is punished.”

      Mere-exposure Effect  The Mere-exposure Effect is a psychological phenomenon where people tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them. It can be something as simple as preference for a face you’re familiar with, or ‘warming’ up to an idea only after being exposed to it a number of times.

      Loss Aversion  Loss Aversion refers to people’s tendency to strongly prefer avoiding losses over acquiring gains. Some studies suggest that losses are twice as powerful, psychologically, as gains – I would hate to lose $100 much more than I’d feel great about winning $100.

      Knowledge Bias  Knowledge Bias refers to the tendency of people to choose the option they know best, rather than the best option. This includes well-known principles like the curse of knowledge, when having indepth knowledge of a subject prevents us from thinking about it from a less-informed perspective.

      Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart NOW! for a sustainable energy future.

      by A Siegel on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 04:16:48 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Nice. (6+ / 0-)

    I think a great corollary to your idea is that conservatism is all about imagining things being the same. So is climate change denial. Imagine the Venn diagram...

    Your diary is definitely more inspiring than the insight in my comment -- and it makes me think about how hard it is for some people to make a shift in thought once they've decided on a "rule." That's the basis of most right wing propaganda. It's harder to change someone's mind than it is to convince them in the first place.

    Just a little digression. Happy New Year, A Siegel.

    Breathe in. Breathe out. Forget this, and attaining enlightenment will be the least of your problems.

    by rb137 on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 04:28:48 PM PST

  •  I remember you posting something very similar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    A Siegel, LinSea, citisven

    to this last year and I think you did an excellent job of fulfilling your New Year's resolution.  I'm going to try and live up to the Pledges I made to myself  here.  

    With regard to climate change:  Are we better off today than we were a year ago?  I could effectively argue both sides of this and make a convincing case either way but personally I lean to the slightly yes side on this one.  Maybe I'm in my own state of denial.  

    Keep blowing your horn A. Siegel and I'll keep listening to it and trying to convince others who cross my path to do the same.   I'll try and blow mine a little more in 2013 and convince others to do the same.  

    I think more people are listening.  I've Done the Math!!

    If we really want to straighten out all this crap we really need to think about shit - Holy Shit.

    by John Crapper on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 05:01:23 PM PST

  •  The world needs more people like you. (5+ / 0-)

    muddy water can best be cleared by leaving it alone

    by veritas curat on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 05:39:32 PM PST

  •  Thanks for all your hard work (5+ / 0-)

    and for being the change you wish to see in the world. Whatever happens in these coming years, know that you're not alone in envisioning another world and way of doing things.

  •  I wonder most (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    A Siegel

    about this part

    Prosperous: that the opportunity will be there for achieving “the American Dream” — an opportunity available to all.  Prosperity — we will be richer if we turn away from today’s heavily-polluting and wasteful energy habits. Prosperity — in health, financial, security terms.
    we will be richer? If you meant that in spiritual terms then I would agree wholeheartedly. But in financial terms? Are you sure? If gasoline taxation is increased (which I agree should happen immediately in the US) - that wouldnt be experienced as making people richer?

    To redesign the financial makeup of such an improved decarbonised society in such a way that people would actually (feel) richer that would be an astonishing feat. I am not sure I follow. If I have a clothes dryer, I know I could afford that and am content. If I dry my cloth in the sun, I am actually richer; but as things currently are, I feel poorer because I "can´t afford the dryer".  Is that not so for most people?

    If I live close to my work so that I can cycle, then I am as rich as can be because I depend on my muscles only (and a bit on the weather) to bring me to work, but generally I am regarded as so poor that I can´t even afford a car - much less a house with dead lawn in suburbia. Is that not so?

    With that I mean: will the decarbonised society not be "prosperous" only if we completely change the way how we look on "being rich"?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site