Skip to main content

David Ignatius fires one off that sets the bar for full coverage.    

All the key village tropes get hit- all in one place for your reading pleasure.  More below the fold.  

So what does the village think about the deal?  

-It's Obama's fault for not creating a grand bargain:

After President Obama failed to negotiate a serious “grand bargain,” he had to be rescued with a mini-bargain brokered by Vice President Biden...
- Obama won a mandate, but does not want to use it:
Obama had seemed poised a few weeks ago to become at last the political leader the country needs. He won a brilliant election victory, using political tools so sophisticated that Republican strategists have been trying ever since to reverse- engineer them so they can avoid humiliating defeats
-Entitlements are THE problem:
Rather than come to the table with a grand vision of his own — a real strategy for cutting the deficit and the entitlement programs that drive it
- Simpson-Bowles was a done deal, had only the President "embraced" it:
He didn’t formulate a plan for long-term solvency partly because he didn’t want to give up the political weapon of Social Security before the 2012 election; he didn’t fully embrace the Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction plan for the same reason.
It was Obama and not the GOP that demanded Social Security be on the table:  
although Obama finally offered in last month’s discussions with Boehner to revise the cost-of-living adjustment to Social Security, he retreated after the Plan B debacle.
-It's OK to use the "deficit" as a political tool- but only sometimes, and of course, Obama never urges fiscal reform because he lives to spend:
Let’s assume it was tactically smart for Obama to play politics with the deficit issue through the campaign. Having won, Obama should quickly have taken the high ground and urged the fiscal reforms that every thoughtful member of his team knows are necessary
-Of course, Saint Reagan knew how to take it to the people:
Obama should communicate his vision forcefully to the country, governing over Congress’s head as Ronald Reagan did, if necessary.  
-And finally, Obama has not yet been "strong" and is a failure:
Obama can still be the strong, successful president the country needs — but not unless he lifts his game.  
The word Defense is never used.  The fact that Simpson Bowles made NO suggestions is never stated.   The GOP has nothing to do with anything- who are they again?  Its assumed that Obama is a weak failure because he is a Democrat, of course.

That's all you need to know about where the village stands.....

What a pathetic example of big time punditry.   Or should I say, a perfect example....

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site