Skip to main content

I saw this on Twitter this morning, and was completely flabbergasted. The newscaster, who looks amazed, tried to tell him that it was ridiculous. She also pointed out, correctly, that slaves, like guns, were possessions. But he just kept talking, trying to make the point that Dr. Martin Luther King would have agreed with him.

Okay. Let's see how this could possibly make ANY sense:

1. Slaves were well-paid enough to afford guns: No. They WEREN'T paid. They were SLAVES.

2. Slaves had the freedom to just mosey over to a gunsmith and order a gun on their days off: No. They didn't have the freedom, usually, to go ANYWHERE.

3. Slaveowners were proud supporters of the Second Amendment, and thought that slaves had the equal right to defend the country: Ha. Slaves were 3/5 of a person. And bad slaveowners had every right to fear being murdered in their beds by gun-toting slaves.

4. Dr. King would have definitely thought that slaves should have had an armed uprising and revolted against the slaveowners, massacring them en masse: Unlikely. Dr. King was a peaceful man.

5. Perhaps, if the potential slaves had been armed in Africa and the West Indies, they could have killed the slave traders when they stepped on shore and prevented slavery THAT way. I'm sure there were plenty of gun dealers in Africa and the West Indies in the 18th century, perhaps one on every block. Kind of like Texas. *

Ugh. I'm out of ideas at this point. How embarrassing for gun owners that such a deeply stupid man is on television speaking for them. Then again, maybe they're nodding their heads and saying, "Yeah!"

I fear for our country.

*This is snark.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site