Skip to main content

By Marcia Greenberger, Co-President, National Women's Law Center
Cross-posted from NWLC's blog

For the second time, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted today to approve President Obama’s nomination of Caitlin Halligan to fill a vacancy on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Ms. Halligan, a talented appellate lawyer, was first nominated in September 2010, and an outpouring of bipartisan support quickly followed from prominent lawyers, law-enforcement officials, women’s legal organizations, and others from around the country. Even so, a minority of Senators insisted on filibustering her nomination, and they have succeeded in blocking it so far.  In the meantime, the number of vacancies on this important court has grown, and now there are an alarming four vacancies on this 11-judge court. Now that the President has resubmitted her nomination, and the Committee has again approved it, it is high time that a confirmation vote is held before the full Senate.

Caitlin Halligan is just the kind of person who should serve as a judge on the D.C. Circuit. She graduated with honors from Georgetown University Law Center and clerked both for Judge Patricia M. Wald on the D.C. Circuit, the court to which she has been nominated, and for Justice Stephen G. Breyer on the Supreme Court. Following these prestigious clerkships, Ms. Halligan continued to excel in each stage of her legal career. She has spent much of her practice in public service, as Solicitor General of the State of New York, and, currently, as General Counsel to the New York County District Attorney’s office. She has also worked in private law practice, most recently as a partner and head of the appellate group at the nationally-known law firm, Weil, Gotshal and Manges, LLP. Not surprisingly given her broad base of experience, the ABA’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary unanimously gave her its highest rating, “Well-Qualified.” And, importantly, if confirmed, Ms. Halligan would become only the sixth female judge in the D.C. Circuit’s history, providing sorely-needed diversity to the federal bench.

The whole country has a stake in her confirmation. The D.C. Circuit has jurisdiction over regulatory actions and decisions of the federal agencies directly affecting people’s lives all over the country—its rulings have particular impact on this nation’s environmental, labor, and antidiscrimination laws, and a host of other areas. It is often called the little Supreme Court, and with good reason.

Despite the importance of the D.C. Circuit, the great need for additional judges, and Ms. Halligan’s superb qualifications, some Republican Senators have tried to justify blocking her by raising a series of specious claims. One in particular had been that the D.C. Circuit has enough judges to handle its caseload. But now, with the vacancies having grown to 40 percent of the D.C. Circuit, continued obstruction of this exceptional nominee on the ground that the Circuit doesn’t need more judges is patently absurd.  Senate obstructionists should follow the lead of Senator Lisa Murkowski, the only Republican Senator who voted to allow a yes-or-no vote on Ms. Halligan’s nomination in 2011, and allow a vote now. And then vote yes.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Yes! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bear83, Villanova Rhodes

    She's great, and the president must really believe in her. He refuses to let Republican obstruction stop her.

    This is a very important court. It's also the one that just issued the hostile decision on Obama's recess appointments. It tilts pretty far to the right.

  •  Court Vacancies act as a serious roadblock (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bear83, Villanova Rhodes

    To justice and progress.

    Court vacancies serve as a means to delay and slow justice, to create overburdened courts that cannot maintain full dockets and to extinguish opportunities of those who wish to get reviews.

    This issue cuts far beyond Republican and Democrat.   It goes to why we have an independent judiciary, and how we value justice.

    Thanks for your diary, a very important issue that doesn't get enough attention.

    Gandhi's Seven Sins: Wealth without work; Pleasure without conscience; Knowledge without character; Commerce without morality; Science without humanity; Worship without sacrifice; Politics without principle

    by Chris Reeves on Thu Feb 14, 2013 at 11:37:23 AM PST

  •  The US Court of Appeals for DC (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Villanova Rhodes

    is hugely important. It handles all sorts of cases involving rulemaking by federal agencies such as the EPA. This is the court that ruled against President Obama's recess appointments to the NLRB.

    The court currently has a 4-3 Republican majority and 4 vacancies. 2 of the 3 Democratic appointees on the court are more than 70 years old.

    It is long past time for Obama's highly rated nominees to join this court.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/...

    Filibuster reform, 2013 - woulda, coulda, shoulda.

    by bear83 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 at 12:24:30 PM PST

  •  Filling that vacancy would reduce the number of (0+ / 0-)

    cases controlled by Judge David Sentilles the right winger who did the recent recess appointment decision and got the Impeachment of Bill Clinton going. And limit the possibility of adding another just like him to the bench at that day possibly far in the future when Rs control the nomination process.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site