Skip to main content

Local stations have a sometimes well-deserved reputation for not delivering hard news, but they are producing some fine journalism on fracking.

Cross posted from Pruning Shears.

I will admit to having had a snobbish view towards local TV news for most of my adult life.  I think it is at least somewhat justified; local TV news frequently has a disreputable whiff.  Whether it's the "if it bleeds, it leads" ethos, sweeps week stunts (this item is in almost all American households AND IT COULD KILL YOUR CHILDREN), large doses of pabulum delivered as News You Can Use, and so on - there is a lot to look down on.

(I won't even go into the disturbing tendency of weather forecasters to insist to viewers that the overwhelming majority of the world's climate scientists are charlatans.)

That perception seems to be fairly common.  Maybe it's a demographics issue; this study (PDF) from Pew shows (p. 37) daily newspaper readers with higher aggregate educational levels than local TV news viewers.  It also shows (p. 38) newspaper readers having higher incomes.  So to put it crudely, newspaper readers are smarter and richer than TV news viewers.

Without even seeing such statistics I definitely internalized a sense of newspapers' superiority over the years.  That bias is silly though; TV, like newspaper, is a medium.  It's what you do with it that matters.  The New York Times is printed on newsprint, and so is The Onion.

The degree to which my assumptions about print and TV are faulty has been brought home over the last year or so as I've become more involved fracking-related activism.  For instance, Youngstown NBC affiliate WFMJ has done a very thorough job covering the issue.  When a company illegally dumped toxic fracking waste in a waterway, reporter Michelle Nicks filled her report with detail: Not just the event itself, but the response (such as it was) from regulators, from state political leaders and national ones as well.

Even more impressively, CBS affiliate WKBN filed public records requests and discovered the company in question has received dozens of citations, violations and injection well suspensions stretching back to the eighties.  WKBN is doing exactly the kind of investigative journalism we normally associate with newspapers - not just reporting the news but really digging into it in order to give viewers a better understanding.

In Cleveland, NBC affiliate WKYC has set up an entire section of its web site for fracking and done a great deal of reporting on it.  Multiple reporters there, including Monica Robins, Dick Russ and Lynna Lai, have reported on the issue from a variety of angles.  While you could say that flaming water from a tap is the kind of arresting visual that conforms to the worst stereotypes of local TV news, there's nothing especially dramatic about a cracked foundation or a politician's legislative proposal.  If it was all about sensation they wouldn't have run most of those reports.

Newspapers have a spotty record on this issue.  Some reporters cover it well.  In northeast Ohio, Bob Downing of the Akron Beacon Journal has been on it for a while now (recent reports here, here and here).  In other fracking-intensive regions I've found reporters like Bruce Finley at the Denver Post doing similarly admirable work (here, here and here for example).

But the largest newspaper in our area - the Cleveland Plain Dealer - has been considerably less thorough.  There is less coverage overall, and the stories tend to center around fracking initiatives or headlining industry propaganda.  While they occasionally look at the political fight over the issue, they rarely look at the effect it is having on local communities.  (Perhaps the publishers don't feel the concerns of blue collar-skewing populations in rural or semi-rural areas are of interest to their more (sub)urban and upscale readership.)

This is especially striking because the paper has repeatedly touched on an issue that seems ready made for a little Truth To Power type initiative.  Jimmy Haslam, the new owner of the Cleveland Browns (and brother of the Tennessee governor, incidentally), owns a trucking company that stands to handsomely profit from fracking.  Shortly after buying the Browns he stepped down as CEO of the company.  Or didn't. ("I'm still going to be CEO of Pilot Flying J.")  That detail was never ironed out exactly.  

He's definitely back in the saddle now though - which raises the same question his heading the company originally raised: Should the owner of such a high profile and beloved franchise be profiting by visiting environmental hazard on a significant portion of his fan base?  There are lots of Browns fans in Youngstown.  Maybe they wouldn't be too crazy about knowing the team's owner is a key part of the industrial chain that just befouled their community.

The PD is not going there, though.  For whatever reason the community impact of fracking has been of zero interest.  Again, this lack of coverage is not characteristic of all newspapers; some are doing a really good job.  My point is that on this urgent, substantive issue, newspapers have been a mixed bag - as have local TV stations.  (In Cleveland, WKYC is head and shoulders above its on-air competition at the moment.)  In general the reporting matrix doesn't break along expected lines.  Sometimes papers provide better coverage.  But in some cases the supposedly low-rent local TV stations have left their ostensibly more respectable print counterparts in the dust.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Well I Will Just Say This (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    commonmass, llywrch

    as a dude with a MA in Journalism (never really used it -- but that is another story). The Cleveland Plain Dealer in journalism circles is known as one of the best newspapers in the country. I mean about the best even if you stack it up against say the Washington Post or New York Times.

    I wish everybody in our nation had a paper like that.

    Now my local paper is apart of Knight-Ridder. Wins award after award, but that doesn't mean it is a "good" paper. You couldn't get me to read it if you pointed a gun at me.

    I read a paper and want reporting. Not opinion in news articles. My local paper can't seem to grasp this little fact.

    Let me give you an example. A ton of Recovery money came into my district. Maybe hundreds of millions. They never report on it, cause well they don't like Obama.

    I only know about all the projects cause the local southern Illinois business journal, and nothing close to a liberal pub, does report on it.

    And as a publication that promotes the business interest of the area, well they might not be big fans of Obama, but they are fans of contrustion projects. And they seem able to give credit where credit is due :).

    Kind of said I have to read a business journal to figure out what is going on around me ....

    When opportunity calls pick up the phone and give it directions to your house.

    by webranding on Sat Feb 23, 2013 at 06:00:10 AM PST

    •  Re: I read a paper and want reporting (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      webranding

      Reporting on fracking from a community and environmental impact standpoint is exactly what's missing from the PD. If they've decided to be the Chamber of Commerce's newsletter by reporting on what the O+G industry is doing but not on its effects, that's a specific editorial choice.

      Whatever the virtues of the PD may be, they are essentially just reporting on side of the story on this one. If their goal is to promote the business interest of the area they should say as much. And that's not something I see as being in any kind of praiseworthy tradition of newspapers. It's boosterism, not journalism.

  •  T&R'd for discussion (0+ / 0-)

    but I can't help wondering if you haven't created your own straw man with your admission of a personal bias in expectations about different media and then knocked it down with your closing statement that wrt fracking coverage "the reporting matrix doesn't break down along expected lines".

    In other words, you've just demonstrated that your own expectations about media were, in fact, biased and inaccurate?    

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Sat Feb 23, 2013 at 06:30:10 AM PST

    •  Yes, that's right (0+ / 0-)

      My expectations about media were, in fact, biased and inaccurate. I don't think there's a straw man argument though; my point is that I expected one thing and found another. A straw man would be more along the lines of "everyone knows local TV news is worthless but HA! look at this!"

      •  my point was more that (0+ / 0-)

        this little framing device was mostly just a distraction; had you simply discussed the actual coverage of the fracking stories by the different media and left off the rather tired and stereotypical expectations stuff, the piece would have been stronger for it; since that's what you seem to be analyzing.

        local is just that: local, which means quality and amount of coverage will vary depending upon a matrix of factors.  But the best local media productions regardless of medium, seem to be the operations that remember they are "local" and try to produce their own content based upon the needs of their localities (and yes, this can and does happen, though much less often that either it used to or it should), rather than those outfits that simply purchase canned national feeds/stories/wire service copy and then look after the fact to try and attach some local spin to it, no matter how tenuous that connection may be. (Where I am our local news coverage, print, broadcast and digital, thinks "local" news is when there is a start of well received movie or TV show who grew up in the area and they can be interviewed to highlight the "local" connection.

        Instead of comparing media forms, you should be celebrating the fact that at least one local outlet has seen that fracking is an important LOCAL story and seeks to cover it that way.

        Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

        by a gilas girl on Sat Feb 23, 2013 at 08:18:29 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site