Skip to main content

Goposaur upside down
They say the first part of fixing a problem is admitting that you have one. With that in mind, check out these lines from the Republican Party's new 100-page review of its failures in 2012 (pdf):
As part of the Growth and Opportunity Project’s effort, focus groups were conducted in Columbus, Ohio, and Des Moines, Iowa, to listen to voters who used to consider themselves Republicans. These are voters who recently left the Party.

Asked to describe Republicans, they said that the Party is “scary,” “narrow minded,” and “out of touch” and that we were a Party of “stuffy old men.” This is consistent with the findings of other post-election surveys.

So at least on paper, Republicans (or at least the ones who wrote the report), know there's an issue. But does that mean they're ready to solve it? Well, unless you think the GOP's problem has nothing to do with the policies it represents, all signs point to no:
Beyond immigration, it barely touches on policy. That was by design, according to the report, because it’s not the RNC’s purview. Still, policy is no small part of the GOP’s internal debate now, which underscores the limitations of what a party committee can do.

For instance, there are no references to abortion or Planned Parenthood — or any of the issues that were at the heart of the battle for female voters last year. The report says the GOP lost the “war on women” messaging but doesn’t make clear how the party should be on offense going forward.

Other suggestions are likely to meet with some chuckles, such as one related to doing better with younger voters: “Establish an RNC Celebrity Task Force of personalities in the entertainment industry to host events for the RNC and allow donors to participate in entertainment events as a way to attract younger voters.”

Hmmm. On the one hand, it really didn't work out too well for John McCain when he attacked Barack Obama in 2008 as "the biggest celebrity in the world." So maybe it does make sense to embrace celebrity culture.

But on the other hand, last I checked, Clint Eastwood was a celebrity. And I think we all remember what he brought to the table in 2012:

Actor Clint Eastwood addresses an empty chair and questions it as if it is U.S. President Obama, as he endorses Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney during the final session of the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida, August 30, 2012.
To be fair, Clint might not be the kind of celebrity Republicans need—he's had a great Hollywood career, but he's in his twilight years, he's a he, and he likes talking to empty chairs on live television. Republicans need somebody better—follow below the fold to find out the celebrity that I'd suggest they consider.

As Clint Eastwood shows, being a celebrity alone isn't enough to expand the GOP's coalition. Republicans need somebody younger. Somebody who doesn't like to converse with empty chairs. Somebody who is—dare I say it—of the female gender. With that in mind, presenting the star of this weekend's show at CPAC:

Sarah Palin shows Mike Bloomberg who's boss on Saturday, March 16, 2013 at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
Problem solved, right? If not, there's always Dennis Miller to consider.
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site